Showing posts with label Stupid Party Follies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stupid Party Follies. Show all posts

Monday, April 29, 2024

Attention Republican Party:

Considering the only thing you clowns have presided over the last while is surrenders, the chances of me sending you money are somewhere below zero.

Especially since the only ones who actually seem to try to stand, your own selves screw over.  Because "You're not behaving as We wish."  So screw yourselves.  Without lube, using an old shovel handle.

Sincerely, etc.

Friday, April 26, 2024

Have I mentioned how sick I am of politicians?

One of my Senators is Lankford, and today, in his monthly "Here's what all I'm doing", on voting for the foreign aid and getting nothing for the border,
This is one of the great challenges of our current political climate. Some people would rather have nothing if they don't get everything they want on an issue. I am a proud conservative, but I also see the national security risk of doing nothing day after day. I worked for months to make some progress closing our wide open borders, rather than just complain about the problem and hope it magically gets better on its own after a press conference. We still have work to do, which is why I was back at it again this week to make progress on closing our open border.
So he voted for it with NOTHING for the border, and we really should shut up about it because it's annoying him.  My interpretation.

The FISA bill ...included 50 new limits on the authority, protections for Americans, and consequences on anyone who abuses the law. There were significant new civil liberty protections in the final version, which I supported.
Because the FBI and others have shown SO much concern for the laws that tell them not to violate said laws, and others, and people's rights.
FISA only applies to foreign intelligence. It is illegal to use that authority to spy on Americans, and the new version of the bill includes fines and jail time for any abuse.
Yet the FBI and others were violating that before, and they will again, but "We made new laws about it!" which is supposed to make it all better.

And the final:
I understand that some people did not want FISA renewed, but as a member of the Intelligence Committee, I am very aware of the importance of learning about terror plots before they happen. We should not ignore the very real threats coming at our nation from foreign terror organizations, even in the past few weeks. We can protect American lives, while also protecting our civil liberties.
Want to bet the FBI & Co. were violating that before it was even signed?
And, though he doesn't mention it, this crap gave the FBI even MORE latitude for doing warrantless searches.

Am I being fair to him?  Well, his statement on the vote included
“Our open southern border has allowed in millions of people from around the world. Without this authority, we cannot investigate if a foreign terror organization is preparing another attack on Americans from one of the many people already on US soil. The United States is a constant target for terrorists, and nearly every day, our intelligence community stops an attack before it happens.
First, hey, know what?  If the Stupid Party had had the integrity and balls to, y'know, DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE BORDER THAT WOULDN'T BE SUCH A THREAT.  But there's always a excuse/reason not to, it seems("You can't get everything!", etc.)

Second, 'every day stops an attack before it happens.'  I have to call Bullshit.  Sounds so much like the TSA insisting they stop lots of terrorists but there are never, that I've heard of any details.  Probably because it's said bullshit.

I think the other Senator, Mullin, said basically the same crap.  I don't think my Rep., Bice, has said anything(it's possible she did and I hadn't heard).  

So yes, I'm pissed at all of them.  The usual "If you knew what I did you'd understand" excuses.  I'm going to sign off before I descend into really bad language.

Oh, said politicians: if you have people looking through social media to see if people are upset with you, damn right we are.  And I think you've earned it.

Friday, February 09, 2024

Seems like Lankford just wants to keep digging

Apparently telling the truth about this being a sucky bill(unless you're an open-borders Democrat) isn't an option, so complain about conservative media people calling you on this mess.

Hell, if he'd said "Look, Sen. McConnell, our leader in the Senate, helped write this and asked for my support, and I felt I had to give it", it would've meant 'So you cared more about supporting him than about the good of the country?', which would've been bad, but it would have been better than still lecturing us about what a good bill it is, dammit.

Wednesday, February 07, 2024

The Stupid Party is really living up to its name

My two Senators kept insisting the 'border deal' is a great deal: "It'll close the border!  It'll get money for more INS people to do that!"  Etc.

Lankford kept insisting "Wait until the actual bill is out, you'll see how good it is!"  Mullin basically pushed the same thing.

Bill comes out.  Lankford still insists, last I heard, "It's basically a good bill except for some of the things the Evil Party threw in!", even as people are saying "You signed onto and helped write this piece of shit?"

I'd written to Mullin basically saying the same thing I'd said to Lankford: "You actually thought this mess was a good idea?  Did they lie to you, roll you, or did we just make a big mistake electing you?"  That elicited a mass email saying "I will always work hard on matters that are of concern to you."  NO mention of that idiot bill, no "I screwed up/made a mistake/trusted people I shouldn't have", just "Please let this go away."

And then the Stupid Party couldn't even get all its members in the House to vote to impeach Mayorkas("The border is secure, no matter how many illegal aliens and terrorists are getting through it!").

The only good thing lately is Ronna McDaniel is- wait, turns out she may not be leaving after all.  That combines with some things Trump has been saying, and...

They might as well make 'Stupid Party' their official name.

Tuesday, February 06, 2024

'Border Bill' my ass,

it's another 'Give the Democrats what they want and screw you and the country' bill.  Borrowing from Ace,
It's not even closing the border, as Biden has repeatedly claimed it was -- it's just "funneling" the illegals to official points of entry, where the law already requires aliens to enter through.

Now Murphy admits that this power merely to "funnel" illegals to ports of entry is only usable a "limited number of days per year."
This allows for a more a more orderly, humane asylum processing system.
6/ But...important checks on that power. It can only be used for a limited number of days per year. It sunsets in 3 years. Emergency cases that show up in between the ports still need to be accepted. The ports must process a minimum of 1400 claims a day. Ah-ha! Even when Biden "closes the border," which Murphy admits never happens, but instead just results in claims being processed at ports of entry, exceptions are still made for "emergency cases!"

Lankford is one of my state's Senators.  I really don't know if he was complicit in this("You haven't seen the actual bill, it really will let us close the border down!") or dumb enough to get rolled on it.  Either way, he's a huge disappointment.  So is Mullin, the other Senator, who insisted how much authority it would give to stop the problems.

And, of course, we have that bastard Schumer, glasses low on his nose, threatening that 'Ukraine will fall, Israel can't defeat Hamas, and US troops may be in combat in Eastern Europe if this bill does not pass!"
Anybody else as sick of this lying shit as I am?


Thursday, December 14, 2023

To say I'm sick of this crap from the Stupid Party is understatement

The swamp screamed "Disaster if you won't let us keep illegally spying on people!" when reform of Secton 702 of FISA was brought up.  Because of course it would be a disaster- for them- if they were made to stop.

My Rep. had this to say today: "I agree that critical reforms are needed to ensure that we are protecting the privacy of American citizens. However,"...  Emphasis mine.  Because letting the usual "But there are things I approve of in the NDA, so screw fixing this" happen- again- is so much easier.

Ms. Bice, this doesn't even rise to the level of Stupid Party, this is "Screw the voters, I want this other stuff passed so let's let the criminals keep violating their oaths and the law" garbage.

'Disappointed in you' is a great understatement as well.

Friday, March 19, 2021

I wrote to my Senate weasel, Lankford, about his voting to confirm Garland as AG

The response boiled down to "I think he's qualified, he's less radical than other names floated, and I have confidence he will uphold the rule of law."

This after the crap Garland said, and refused to say, in the hearings.  And his open hostility toward the 2nd Amendment.

Throw this on top of voting to allow cops to search someone's internet history without a warrant, and when he spoke about the problems in the last election some group in Tulsa bitched that he'd hurt their feelings and he reversed so fast he probably got whiplash, and his vote to impeach Trump after he was already out of office...

I've heard someone is working to primary Lankford in the next election, and I'm glad.

Monday, December 14, 2020

Question: How long will it take for the MeToo clowns

to throw Boylan under the bus to protect Gov. Howler? Not long, I'd bet.


Wasn't aware of this, the Stupid Party has a slight majority of AG offices.  Which is good(assuming at least most of them aren't SP lumps).  Now the question arises: Enough people are so effing pissed about the cheating in this election, wonder if can expand that number a bit at the next election?


'Kids mental health deteriorated 'substantially' during lockdown'

No shit?


I'm wondering if the idiots in Seattle will ever realize just how much the leftist morons they put in office despise said idiots?



Friday, March 23, 2018

High-level academics...

A philosophy professor at Siena College says that she left the committee on civil discourse because the thought of working with some conservative students was “making me miserable.” 

In an email obtained by Campus Reform, professor Jennifer McErlean strongly condemned the conservative students on her campus, voicing her desire to protest the upcoming “Let Freedom Ring” conference that is slated to feature several prominent political figures including investigative journalist James O’Keefe, lobbyist Roger Stone, and others.
"These students are guilty of BadThink, and I can't stand it!"  Wonder what kind of crap she's been putting her students through?


The Stupid(aka Backstabber) Party strikes again.
Congressional Republicans are jeopardizing the Second Amendment rights of 4.2 million senior citizens. At the same time, they have voted to funnel tens of millions of dollars to gun control organizations and support other actions that Democrats will love. 

All of this is wrapped up in the giant $1.3 trillion spending bill that the House of Representatives approved Thursday on a 256-167 vote and sent to the Senate.
We need term limits.  And once we have them, we jumpstart the process by throwing a bunch of these asshats out of high windows. 


#NEVERAGAIN is not yours to use to distort reality. It certainly isn’t yours to use to reaccomplish the Nazis’ evil; disarming the undesirables all over again.
Go read the whole thing.

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

To every Democrat who shoved Obamacare down our throats:

I hope you die in a crotch fire.  I'll supply the matches.

To every useless, backstabbing clown in the Stupid Party who just demonstrated- again- what lying bastards they are: you get a crotch fire too.  And I hope it hurts every second.

Yes, I just found out what my insurance is going up by for next year.  Assuming I can work out keeping it.  One of those "We just couldn't get it done" assholes shows up in front of me, they're getting a close-up look at the gutter.

Friday, December 18, 2015

A: The Republic- no, call it right, the Stupid and Backstabbing Party

surrendered to Obama and the Democrats.  Again.  Fuck every one of the lying clowns who voted for this.

B: Our President is- just read:
In his meeting with the columnists, Mr. Obama indicated that he did not see enough cable television to fully appreciate the anxiety after the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, and made clear that he plans to step up his public arguments. Republicans were telling Americans that he is not doing anything when he is doing a lot, he said.
To be stupid enough to say that, let alone actually mean it...

But never fear!, the Professional Media is on the case:
By Friday morning, however, the entire passage containing Obama’s admission had been erased from the story without any explanation from the New York Times
My, how Pravda of them.

The excuse, when caught: "We were just editing for length!"  Right.
The addition (116 words) was much longer than the deletion (66 words) of the section that made Obama look bad.
And people ask why we don't trust the media.  Or this terrorist-coddling clown in the Oval Office.




Monday, August 18, 2014

A: You were warned, dumbass

In hindsight, Mark said, Mitt Romney lined up with everything he believes in: “But what he was proposing was drowned out by the image Obama gave of him being a rich guy out of touch and tone-deaf to the needs of the country.

Turns out Obama was that guy, not Romney,” he said, jumping off the back of the truck and heading back onto the farm field with his crew.
B: Gee, think what might've happened if the Stupid Party hadn't had a candidate who tended to make people think 'Obama Lite'...

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Tab clearing

Hamas-linked CAIR (Council on Anti-American Islamic Relations) leader told a crowd at a rally for Islam that members of the faith should not be bound by American law. “If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land,” said Mustafa Carroll, executive director of CAIR-Dallas branch.


What?  The Obama/Holder DoJ doesn't want to provide information?  Who'd have suspected such a thing?


"What?  Let the common rabble actually VOTE on this?  Ridiculous!"


Representative Bob Goodlatte: one more backstabbing Stupid Party dirtbag.


Another reason the EPA should be closed down.  And the IG of said agency terminated.

Preferably- well, I'll let that go.


24 of the various scandals the media doesn't want to talk about(guess who's involved?).


Another democrat trying to hide Obamacare numbers.


The decay of the profession of arms.
Having listened to some of sons' stories about Army idiocies, I believe it.


The accordion; I KNEW the damn things were evil.





Thursday, February 28, 2013

"If Bush had done this-", etc.,

you know the drill:
BLITZER: What was said?
WOODWARD: It was said very clearly, you will regret doing this.

BLITZER: Who sent that e-mail to you?

WOODWARD: Well, I'm not going to say.

BLITZER: Was it a senior person at the White House?

WOODWARD: A very senior person. And just as a matter -- I mean, it makes me very uncomfortable to have the White House telling reporters, 'you're going to regret doing something that you believe in, and even though we don't look at it that way, you do look at it that way.'

I'm not holding my breath, but it would be nice if some of those journalists remembered that idea called 'reporting' and actually did some of it.  Maybe this will help.  Not likely; a roundup over at Insty.


So Howler Cuomo and minions decided they need to exempt the cops from the bill they didn't bother to read before shoving through, AND
...but those restrictions will be changed so those types of weapons can be used on the sets of television shows and movies being shot in New York.
Screw the citizens of NY, but the TV and movie weenies need to be kept happy; they have the proper attitudes and bring in lots of money.


The Dutchman seems to be more right all the time:
I've said it before and I'll repeat: these collectivist pukes are more race-obsessed than the Nazi Gauleiter of 1930's Lower Swabia.


Sooner or later the Big One won't be needed; Californicated is just going to collapse.
As Erin put it, 'Green is the new black(out).'
As California's cap-and-trade program kicks in this year, the number of refineries will continue to go down, and the price of gasoline will continue to rise.
 
California already has some of the nation's highest electricity prices -- 39 percent higher than the national average -- and those will continue to rise as the state begins to enforce both its renewable energy mandate and cap-and-trade programs.
...Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported that California will once again face rolling blackouts starting in 2015, thanks to the loss of conventional plants and unreliability of wind and solar energy due to weather fluctuations.

I'll add something about this line: The cap-and-trade law will at least spare residential consumers and utility companies part of the added pain with rebates and special allowances.  No, it won't; they might not be directly paying the increase, but the prices of EVERYTHING will go up more because of it, and they're damn well paying that.

California, you wanted it; you've got it.


A: Anyone who believes the White House and DHS 'didn't know about the release' is a fool.
B: I'm wondering what the payoff for the DHS clown is?


A fine summation of the Republican Party:
If the roles were reversed, Democrats would never have let the nominee get confirmed. Thanks to the GOP, we have a Washington where stellar candidates such as John Bolton and Miguel Estrada do not get confirmed, but a pro-Iranian anti-Israeli dolt like Chuck Hagel gets through.

-- NRO's Andrew McCarthy on Hagel's Confirmation



Lady, you want to make that choice for yourself, go ahead; but do not demand that I do so.
During the rally, one female protester — wearing an Obama hat — told WGCL-TV that using a firearm in self-defense “is not an option.” 
“It’s not an option,” she repeated. 
The reporter then asked her, “But what if someone is trying to kill you?” She replied, “They’ll just have to kill me.”

Monday, December 31, 2012

Time to call your Stupid Party congresscritter

and raise hell about this.  If true, it's not just a cave, it's surrender.  And should be treated as such by us.
The crucial email is the one sent at 3:06 pm on the 27th. The source notes that Newtown would not have been prevented if Feinstein’s bill had been law, but allows that the Republicans may assist in banning “high-capacity magazines” and move on background checks, along with mental health and enforcement of existing law.


 And let us not forget, in all this, that for a crime which would've seen anyone else arrested the next day, the DC PD is still 'investigating' Gregory.  Translated, "We're going to keep 'investigating' until it hopefully goes away.  I mean, arrest a journalist?  We can't treat him like we would a disabled vet or somebody!"


So, get rid of 'high-capacity' mags and get rid of privacy... yeah, that's a GREAT effing idea!
I want to see some of the idiots behind this idea opening the door to a ninja-suited SWAT team insisting they're going to search 'or else' because "Your online buying pattern indicates you're planning something."  See how much they like it.


Gun-bigot reasoning: Trash any Amendment you don't like, declare an organization of citizens a terrorist organization, and torture politicians who won't go along; Donald Kaul, you are invited to kiss my ass.  How about we decide the 1st Amendment is more trouble than it’s worth and restrict the ability of journalists and commentators to cause damage?  Would you like that?


From bloody Pravda:
 These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.
...
 Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers


Monday, November 26, 2012

Again, "It's the cover-up" only counts

if the media actually bothers to investigate and REPORT on it.
And we have the racial grievancemongers (aka Congressional Black Caucus) screaming 'RACISM!!!' at anyone who dares to criticize Rice; and the media reports every damn word of that crap, don't they?
Because that's far more important than a burned consulate and CIA office and a few dead Americans.

 Speaking of which,
Forget questions of who ordered what and when it was ordered and what assets were available to assist those poor souls at Benghazi. Smucker, a known and very vocal supporter of Mr. Obama, just thinks that “shit happens.”

It doesn’t work that way with other Presidents, or for those with whom he disagrees.  For instance, he also went off on a diatribe against Mr. Bush for allowing UBL escape Tora Bora.  For Smucker, who wrote a book on the subject, UBL’s escape isn’t about shit happening.

But for the right President, people like Smucker and Kmiec are willing to throw their colleagues and good friends under the bus.  They are just so much collateral damage, and knew all about the risks associated with their job.



A point about dealing with gun bigots and control freaks:
Gun control at its root has always been about gun control.  Feinstein is a statist, and her laws and regulations will always and forever increase the power of the state. Feinstein sees through McArdle’s argument on cosmetics, which is why her proposed ban includes semi-automatic weapons. There isn’t anything cosmetic about the aims of the gun control advocates.

Arguing that their bans don’t adequately distinguish between weapons leads them to refine their ban.  Arguing that there is equivalent lethality between weapons denies aspects of utility and design, and only causes them to ban weapons that have specific utility for home and self defense.  And arguing that their regulations were ineffective only embarrasses them to pass even more onerous ones.

The correct way to argue against Feinstein’s proposed assault weapons ban is to argue that there is no constitutional basis for such a ban, and any new assault weapons ban would be at least as immoral and obscene as the last one was.


More of the 'what we're finding out is in the bill', and it sucks.
 Remember Obama promised this as a free exam — no co-pay, no deductible, no charge. That’s fine and dandy if you are healthy and have no complaints. However, we are obligated by law to code specifically for the reason of the visit. An annual exam is one specific code; you can not mix this with another code, say, for rectal bleeding. This annual visit covers the exam and “discussion about the status of previously diagnosed stable conditions.” That’s the exact wording under that code — insurance will not cover any new ailment under that code.
If you are here for that annual exam, you will not be covered if you want to discuss any new ailment or unstable condition. I cannot bait and switch to another code — that’s illegal. We, the physicians, are audited all the time and can lose our license for insurance fraud.


Well, there's another actor who goes in the 'idiot part-player' category.


Why did Obama win the election?
One more thing: it's been mentioned that Romney just didn't sell himself to a lot of conservatives and libertarians.  A week or so ago I had the radio on Rush' show, and a caller was someone who hadn't voted.  Said flatly that he knew that by not voting in his state it was essentially a vote for Obama, knew all the problems.  Asked why,(paraphrased),
"I saw Romney attack conservatives in the primaries with energy, but when it came to Obama he was measured and polite.  He made it plain who he actually sees as his opponents, and it's not Obama and those like him.  Add that to his record on a number of things, and I just could not vote for him."
I'd imagine that covers a LOT of people who didn't vote: given a choice between the socialist and the socialist-lite, they thought "Why bother?" and stayed home.
And the Stupid Party response?  "We need to be more like the socialists!"
Why yes, I DO despair.
Added: as Kevin notes,
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die."

Friday, July 20, 2012

Some first-aid gear on sale

over here, here, here, here. Looks like some other stuff, too.


The Stupid Party strikes again; more and more I'm leaning toward a third party, because neither of the two currently in the running are worth a crap.
“Through the lack of aggressive leadership by the Republicans, two things are happening,” this correspondent observed. “People who want to come forward with information, information that I have and can now not share, are backing off because they’re scared that they’re going to be left out to hang.”

“That’s frightening,” Walters remarked. “Frightening. Free society? Free? These people are petrified of their own government and won’t open their mouths.”
Link
Indeed. And these are but two instances with which Gun Rights Examiner has had direct recent experience. That similar reluctance to get involved is probably more widespread seems a reasonable assumption, and it’s fair to ask what more the public isn’t learning-- and may never know--because those who do see no personal “up” side in coming forward and plenty of sobering reasons not to.


Southern California Edison: You suck. Cowardly, suck-up-to-politicians bastards.


I think I mentioned this before: why Make A Wish can kiss my ass.

Tuesday, June 05, 2012

Yeah, it does sound like grounds for a suit,

which is probably why the very rapid apology.
Barnes & Noble has apologized after a senior citizen said staff at one of the retail giant's Arizona stores ejected him because he was on his own in the children's area.

Omar Amin claimed a store worker told him a female shopper had complained he was in the children's area in the store in Scottsdale, The Arizona Republic reported.
Anybody believe they'd have acted the same if someone had complained a woman was in the childrens' area alone?



EPA Region 1 Administrator Curt Spalding told the Yale University gathering, “Lisa Jackson has put forth a very powerful message to the country,” that “if you want to build a coal plant you got a big problem.” Spalding went on to explain that the decision was “painful” because “you got to remember if you go to West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and all those places, you have coal communities who depend on coal. And to say that we just think those communities should just go away, we can’t do that. But she had to do what the law and policy suggested. And it’s painful. It’s painful every step of the way.”
Yeah, I'm sure you're just bleeding in sympathy for them, aren't you?



On Gunwalker and our disgrace AG:
“I think the speaker is probably going to be sufficiently embarrassed by the fact that the attorney general is also blowing him off as they did with the subpoena that was issued in October. I find it totally an embarrassment, I find it totally wrong that the attorney general would just ignore a subpoena.”

“You can’t do that in this country and get away with it,” Chaffetz added.
Uh, yes he can, if Boehner and Cantor & Co. remain too chickenshit or cowardly to actually DO anything.

Issa, on the other hand, is at least trying to do things:
Senior officials in the Department of Justice were given detailed information about Fast and Furious gunwalking operations, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrel Issa, R-Calif., told Attorney General Eric Holder in a letter today.

Referencing “immense detail” in sealed wiretap applications obtained by the committee that had been approved by these officials, Issa claimed “The close involvement of these officials – much greater than previously known – is shocking.”

“Throughout the course of the congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious, the [Justice] Department has consistently denied that any senior officials were provided information about the tactics used in Operation Fast and Furious,” Issa wrote, saying “statements made by senior Department officials regarding the wiretaps [were] false and misleading.”

“You have repeatedly either denied involvement by senior officials in Fast and Furious, or asserted that the wiretap applications do not contain rich detail about irresponsible investigative tactics,” Issa told the Attorney General.
Put in plain language, "Mr. Holder, you're a lying bastard and we can prove it." Now if Boehner will discover some testicles he's forgotten about, maybe something can be done.

And things NEED to be done, because there are consequences to the Stupid Party leadership not being willing to act:
The first account deals with an ATF whistleblower. Gun Rights Examiner engaged in extensive telephone conversations with a known source, followed by numerous emails, to clarify information provided, only to be asked not to publicly release the report after it had been drafted. The reason for this was the source had no confidence that anyone would provide protection, particularly in light of personal experience as well as other documented cases of retaliation by the government.

The second story was sourced by an industry insider in a geographical region that is not the Southwest, but who nonetheless provided details of gunwalking and straw purchasing to include the name of an agent from Phoenix familiar to those who have followed reporting on Fast and Furious. Again, after a long and detailed telephone interview, supplemented by a series of clarifying follow-up questions, the source elected not to proceed with publication because of a sudden ATF visit that could devastate the business or worse. Further or more specific details cannot be provided in order to protect this source’s identity, but it can be said that (he/she) runs an enterprise many gun owners would recognize and this person is also implicitly trusted by the head of a prominent state-level gun rights group who brought (him/her) together with Gun Rights Examiner.

“Through the lack of aggressive leadership by the Republicans, two things are happening,” this correspondent observed. “People who want to come forward with information, information that I have and can now not share, are backing off because they’re scared that they’re going to be left out to hang.”

“That’s frightening,” Walters remarked. “Frightening. Free society? Free? These people are petrified of their own government and won’t open their mouths.”
Happy, Mr. Boehner and Mr. Cantor?


The police in Aurora, near Denver, received a “reliable” tip that the man responsible for an earlier Wells Fargo bank robbery was stopped at the intersection’s red light.

We didn’t have a description, didn’t know race or gender or anything, so a split-second decision was made to stop all the cars at that intersection, and search for the armed robber,” Aurora police officer Frank Fania told ABC News
I've got a bit of a problem with this.


Well, yeah, if they
didn't do something, but it did not affect safety, then why are you all upset and firing people? Because they didn't follow orders, or because not acting would indicate just what bullshit this is?



No, Mr. Aborn, we DON'T believe you; because we know you're a liar


The Canadian government says "Screw you, gun owners. We don't have the balls to say it outright, so we'll do it this way.


Idiot judge made a really stupid ruling; this law was the result, and the Usual Suspects are really upset about it.


Ok, NRA, so what the hell was this about?

Monday, May 14, 2012

We're back to 'Is Juan Williams just effing stupid,

or willing to say anything to get back in the good graces(such as they are) of the left?
But Issa — like Captain Ahab in his sinking ship — continues to go farther out, beyond the limits of rigorous oversight. He is now in uncharted waters where Democrats are charging that Issa, lacking evidence of wrongdoing, is hauling on board rumors and innuendo in a purely political attempt to defame Holder and hurt the president.
...
The most influential civil rights group in Washington, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, charged in a May 7 letter to Issa that he is pursuing “a rush to judgment intended to create a stain on the office of the Attorney General.”

The letter continued: “The development is particularly disturbing because of the exemplary job the Attorney General has done in enforcing the nation’s civil rights.”
Let's see... Holder has basically wiped his ass with a subpoena, has flatly lied in sworn testimony, is trying real hard to cover up what he's done in Gunwalker, but Issa is 'intending to create a stain'? I'd say Holder's already done that. And is busy spreading it around.

As to the 'exemplary job'... the mind boggles at the mindset that can see the crap Holder has done in that way. Or be so dishonest as to describe it that way.


Speaking of Gunwalker and ATF(an agency under Holder, let's not forget), how 'bout this?
For all of this, the 34-year-old Jackson would be just another habitual criminal except for one startling fact: He was working the entire time as a paid informant for the Seattle office of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.—Seattle Times

And another borrow from Sipsey Street:
With a bit of hyperbole, Newswmax reports that Dem support for the principal Gunwalker at DOJ is "collapsing" when maybe it is just cracking the facade a bit.
David Codrea, however, draws our attention to this Politico story entitled "GOP leaders go slow on Eric Holder contempt vote."
I seem to recall my being vilified for running stories early on that Boehner and his GOP "leadership" were trying to help the Gunwalker Conspiracy by roadblocking the investigation. They denied it then. Now, they are hiding.
Hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt? Not so fast, says House Republican leadership.
Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy of California have decided to slow Rep. Darrell Issa’s drive to hold the attorney general in contempt over the controversial Fast and Furious program, a move that could infuriate conservatives who have been calling for Holder’s resignation.
The delay could be a month or even longer, according to lawmakers and aides familiar with the issue.
Some within House GOP leadership circles would like Issa to abandon his plan for a committee and floor vote, which was sparked by a 64-page memo last week, which laid out the case for contempt.
They fear negative political fallout from citing the U.S. attorney general with contempt of Congress in an election year.
House GOP leaders are remaining mum on their plans. On Wednesday, Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy met privately — without any staff present — to discuss how to handle what many House Republicans complain is a glacially slow investigation into the scandal, according to several sources with knowledge of the meeting. . .
Republican leaders are pushing Issa to do more committee work and to build bipartisan support for the contempt resolution before they let it come to the floor for a vote.
But Republican leadership’s resistance to a contempt vote is a major development in the Fast and Furious scandal and one that risks the wrath of the conservative movement. The botched federal program has become a cause célèbre for conservatives, who cite it as an example of what they consider a corrupt and reckless government. . .
Yet despite the detailed committee memo and more than a year of hearings, GOP leaders still don’t think the case is “rock solid,” according to an aide.
The three top House Republicans are worried about both the legal and political implications of the move, especially six months before what is already expected to be a razor-close election. And now, committee sources say they’ll have to wait at least another month — or even longer — before the panel even brings up the contempt measure. . .
Boehner declined to comment to a reporter in the Capitol on Wednesday. Cantor, who is responsible for committee chairs, told POLITICO to “stay tuned.” A Cantor spokesman said he was unavailable for an interview Wednesday, and his staff has permanently canceled the majority leader’s weekly pen and pad. McCarthy’s office also declined an interview request.
The committee didn’t predict the situation to play out this way. Earlier this week, members of Issa’s investigatory panel were hoping to vote next week to hold the attorney general in contempt for not sending requested information to Capitol Hill.
So, that's that. So much for the denials. So much for the denigration of my sources and my stories. They were right all along. The question is, WHAT DO YOU INTEND TO DO ABOUT IT?
These traitors to their Constitutional oaths have taken their decision -- from politics or blackmail, who is to say -- and now they are hiding from it. The least we can do is smoke them out -- burn up their switchboards, fax machines, overload their emails, Facebooks, and Twitters. There are a whole bunch of so-called "conservative" commentators out there. Are they going to let this pass without comment? These are political creatures who live in front of the camera. New media journalists ought to be grilling them every time on why they are protecting the Obama administration's law-breaking. And YOU can help this process along by asking every one of our so-called friends why they aren't frying these traitorous bastards in the court of public opinion. If you don't fight the cover-up, you are part of it.
Personal opinion: Boehner needs to be kicked out of that position, and also out of Congress; so do Cantor every other weenie in the Stupid Party 'leadership' that doesn't have the balls or integrity(or both) to do their damned job.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Realizing a lot of Stupid Party members don't worry much about gun owners,

it's still a bit of a bother that various people have asked Romney, in various ways, about Romneycare, but I don't think ANYBODY has asked him flat-out "You pushed for a bragged about some of the worst anti-gun-ownership laws in the country as Governor; how can we trust you not to push for the same things nationally if you're elected President?"