Know those magnetic mounts to hold a pistol under the dash as you drive? After all the videos of mostly-peaceful protesters breaking windows and dragging people out, a lot of people are looking for those.
“Holy crap,” an agent responded. “All the analysts too?”
“Yep,” the first agent said. “All the folks at the Agency as well.”
“[C]an I ask who are the most likely litigators?” an agent responded. “[A]s far as potentially suing y’all[?]”
“[H]aha, who knows….I think [t]he concern when we got it was that there was a big leak at DOJ and the NYT among others was going to do a piece,” the first agent said.
That's a quote from the Dutchman that fits with far too many leftists. Which the NYeffing Times is very much. This is some of their latest bullshit:The term “people of color” is already ambiguous enough with white
professors, grad students, and NAACP presidents claiming to be black.
But the New York Times’ racial list, a thing reeking of
Nuremberg and Goebbels, put the paper in charge of deciding who is a
person of color by marking them with yellow. It’s a good thing no
notorious racist ideology had the same idea.
(The Times had previously published a list of members of
Congress who had voted against aiding Iran’s nuclear ambitions and
terrorist regime by marking Jewish members in yellow.)
Like all racist Rohrsarch charts, the Times’ racial list says more about it than about America.
The Times claimed that only 112 of the 431 House of
Representatives members are people of color. It lists Rep. Rashida Tlaib
as a person of color, while listing Rep. Justin Amash as white.
Tlaib's parents and Amash's father came from Arab towns and
neighborhoods in Israel. Amash's mother came from Syria. They both have
traditional Arab names.
How is Tlaib a person of color while Amash is white?
...
As Twitter observers of the New York Times racial list noted, the paper of racial record appears to invariably list Arab Christians as white, while Muslims are described as people of color.
because the dew was so heavy it might as well have rained, I'm not lifting anything heavy because the back has been having some difficulty, and it was a long past few days; I think I'm going to take it easy today.
On the ammo and components situation at the place I work: for about three weeks had no small pistol or rifle primers except Remington 6 1/2 rifle, and those were bought up in the end by people planning on using them for pistol. Some Remington Large Rifle, which for some reason people didn't seem to want(no experience with them so can't comment), still some large rifle magnum as of yesterday.
No 9mm, .38, or .40 bullets, still have .45 and .44. Range brass is selling about as fast as it's processed and bagged. Rifle bullets other than .223 a fair amount, and a few 100-round boxes of 50 & 53-grain .223, most people wanting bulk in that(surprised those boxes were left).
Powder is getting short, with most of the 'use for 9mm/.40/.45' being out right now.
Did a bit of looking around, a lot of bullets and powders are still available but you'd have to order, primers are short everywhere. Guy who came in a week or so ago mentioned he'd bought a thousand small rifle at a gun show for $125, because he had none and couldn't find any anywhere.
I think we're out of almost every kind/brand of loading press, too.
Firearms... longer-barrel shotguns and bolt rifles for hunting are in pretty good supply, but AR patterns, AKs, shorter shotguns, are in very short supply. Handguns selling just as fast, especially those suitable for concealed carry/self-defense. LOTS of first-time buyers, and the 'learn to shoot' and CCW classes are full for at least the next month, some longer.
I hope the "We want to ban everything" clowns are paying attention, because all these people are not buying things just to turn them in to some .gov office.
but it does seem to repeat.
How did educated, liberal society respond to such terrorism? What was the position of the Constitutional Democratic (Kadet) Party and its deputies in the Duma (the parliament set up in 1905)? Though Kadets advocated democratic, constitutional procedures, and did not themselves engage in terrorism, they aided the terrorists in any way they could. Kadets collected money for terrorists, turned their homes into safe houses, and called for total amnesty for arrested terrorists who pledged to continue the mayhem. Kadet Party central committee member N. N. Shchepkin declared that the party did not regard terrorists as criminals at all, but as saints and martyrs. The official Kadet paper, Herald of the Party of People’s Freedom, never published an article condemning political assassination. The party leader, Paul Milyukov, declared that “all means are now legitimate . . . and all means should be tried.” When asked to condemn terrorism, another liberal leader in the Duma, Ivan Petrunkevich, famously replied: “Condemn terror? That would be the moral death of the party!”
