There used to be a joke about the New York Times, if they got word the world would end

tomorrow their headline would be "World Ending; Women and Minorities Hardest Hit."

Their favorite terrorist supporters and Jew haters have a new hero, who murdered two people because they're Jews*, and the big worry by the NYeffingTimes is "How will this hurt all the people calling for dead Jews but who haven't committed any attacks yet?"

As has been said, they would be ashamed of themselves, if they had any shame.

Remember what I said the other day about 'Carry, whenever and wherever you can'?

The left and the terrorist supporters(as if there's much difference any more) is making it plain they think these murders are to be taken as examples.

ANY murder of someone who's a Disapproved Person.
Note this shithead is backing off of her outright praise.  Which makes her a chickenshit as well.

Another.

Lots of this out there, from those open about it and those who couch it in what they figure to be deniable terms.

Wherever/whenever you can, carry.  Because there's no we to know when the next one will do his 'Praise me, I'm a martyr!' crap.

Oh yes, things are picking up

Asshat murdered two Israeli embassy people, said asshat being a member of Party for Socialism and Liberation.  Rather an interesting racist past too.  

This caused a man to remind us of something:

Yeah, an awful lot of leftists cheering on murder.

Speaking of, a roundup of some of this noise, which is getting louder.

Folks, my personal opinion is that if you normally carry for self-defense, good; if you don't, you'd better consider carrying everywhere and when you legally can.  Probably with a reload or two.  Because some of this crap is going to get worse, probably in a lot of places.

Just put it that the UN is on the enemy side,

the more bloody-handed the enemy, the better.

With their Prime Minister Two-Tier leading the surrender

Britain pressed to give away fishing grounds permanently in return for the right to accept EU laws and courts permanently. 
 You couldn't make it up.

You might remember this little two-faced socialist as recently acting as if he were going to reduce migration into Britain; now he'll probably say something like "I did try, but my masters in the EU told me to do this instead."  


Mr. Steyn has several of the current marks of surrender by European countries, such as
There Mr Galloway is at odds with the rest of the Internet, which seems to have concluded unanimously that he's the latter. In the legacy media, one is struck by the all the Fleet Street dogs not barking. After all, two properties and one former motor vehicle of the PM have just been rather seriously firebombed, allegedly by a twenty-one-year-old Ukrainian "male model" with minimal English-language skills. At the very least, surely, this raises security questions, no?

On the face of it, yes. It was "counter-terrorism" officers who took down a second suspect at Luton Airport attempting to leave the country. This chap is twenty-six. That's all we've been told. Another "male model"?

It's beginning to feel a bit like the initial reports, two years ago, about a certain BBC presenter being harassed over some lad he'd been corresponding with - in which the alert listener had the vague feeling every media grandee knew what was really going on but they had all agreed not to tell anyone. ...


Once upon a time, leftie women would have agreed with Eva. My opponent at the Munk Debate in Toronto, Louise Arbour, was the first UN commissioner to prosecute rape as a war crime. But that was then, and this is now. And all across the west the political class has accepted that a certain number of our most vulnerable women and children have to be sacrificed to the volcano gods of diversity. On the Continent Eva is one of a very few to speak out against this disgusting indifference - which increasingly wipes out whatever moral claims we might make to the superiority of our "values".


And, from the Germany working its way back to proper "Shut up, villagers" territory,
Yet the most significant development from the Remigration Summit was not on stage. En route to Milan, eight German attendees were prevented by police from boarding their flights - on the grounds that, to permit these six men and two women to exit the Fourth Reich and pass through the New & Improved Berlin Wall to the world beyond, would create a "significant risk of damage to the reputation of the Federal Republic".

Ain't it just freakin' wonderful?

I do have to wonder what Starmer's payoff for tossing all those commoners to the rabid EU is?

My, isn't this all interesting timing?

Here's the whole post.

God, this is such a damn mess.  We've got crooked politicians, crooked journalists, then the release of the Hur recordings showing just how bad Biden's interview was, and now this.

Biden was supposed to be reelected, then have to resign because of health and make Harris President?  Or maybe they hoped they- staff, Pelosi, Schumer & Co.- could keep using the autopen to do things a pretend the 'President' did them as long as possible before he had to withdraw?

Whatever the hell they actually had in mind, they knew their tame little journalists would carry water for them.

Said journalists being the ones who did it, and now are desperately trying to 

A: Pretend they knew NOTHING(insert Sgt. Schulz picture here) about Biden's condition to try to save what reputation they have, and
B: Try real hard to make money from their confession that they're either incompetent or completely corrupt.

And let's not forget a HUGE thing: WHO the hell was using the autopen to sign things illegally, and on how many things?  Probably from Day 1.

This is one of those 'There are people who belong in prison for this, but we'll never get the information to do it' things.