Monday, December 31, 2012

Time to call your Stupid Party congresscritter

and raise hell about this.  If true, it's not just a cave, it's surrender.  And should be treated as such by us.
The crucial email is the one sent at 3:06 pm on the 27th. The source notes that Newtown would not have been prevented if Feinstein’s bill had been law, but allows that the Republicans may assist in banning “high-capacity magazines” and move on background checks, along with mental health and enforcement of existing law.

 And let us not forget, in all this, that for a crime which would've seen anyone else arrested the next day, the DC PD is still 'investigating' Gregory.  Translated, "We're going to keep 'investigating' until it hopefully goes away.  I mean, arrest a journalist?  We can't treat him like we would a disabled vet or somebody!"

So, get rid of 'high-capacity' mags and get rid of privacy... yeah, that's a GREAT effing idea!
I want to see some of the idiots behind this idea opening the door to a ninja-suited SWAT team insisting they're going to search 'or else' because "Your online buying pattern indicates you're planning something."  See how much they like it.

Gun-bigot reasoning: Trash any Amendment you don't like, declare an organization of citizens a terrorist organization, and torture politicians who won't go along; Donald Kaul, you are invited to kiss my ass.  How about we decide the 1st Amendment is more trouble than it’s worth and restrict the ability of journalists and commentators to cause damage?  Would you like that?

From bloody Pravda:
 These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.
 Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers


Luton Ian said...

Check out William Grigg's last two posts at pro libertate.

Anonymous said...

One of the things that worries me most is the idea of restricting gun ownership based on mental health. I understand we must be realistic, and the current restrictions seem to be alright, but going forward we must remember:
Many, if not most, Progressives consider Conservatives to be mentally ill. Many Progressives I've talked to, including one of my daughters, consider Conservatism to be a birth defect, or mental illness, and that Conservatives should not be allowed to participate in government.
So what happens if our decidedly left-leaning FedGov decides they're right, and that we are in fact mentally ill? I know, I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?