The scene in which this lady caused no telling how many boys who didn't really get what it was about girls as yet to get an idea.
Saturday, August 09, 2025
Two-Tier & Co. wanted people to not be able to talk to each other
so they couldn't organize things like these.
Now their* media is not talking about this because "We can't allow these bloody peasants[/King Arthur] to know just how much noise they're making! Let alone how much trouble it causes!"
Screw the bastards, make it loud, people.
Now their* media is not talking about this because "We can't allow these bloody peasants[/King Arthur] to know just how much noise they're making! Let alone how much trouble it causes!"
*Because they're both owned by and obedient to the leftists.
Friday, August 08, 2025
What the hell is wrong with Northern Virginia that this kind of crap
hasn't already been cleaned up?
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) tells 7News Reporter Nick Minock that they are launching an investigation into claims that school staff arranged abortions for students and didn’t tell their parents.
This story has blown up on social media -- a report that says school officials at Fairfax County’s Centerville High School arranged and bankrolled abortions for girls without so much as a phone to their parents back in 2021.
The report says one of the two girls involved was 17 years old.
They're 'launching an investigation', which the past says means "We'll cover this up and make it go away as fast as we can." Which means there needs to be a criminal investigation by people they can't shut up.
Well, Virginia?
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) tells 7News Reporter Nick Minock that they are launching an investigation into claims that school staff arranged abortions for students and didn’t tell their parents.
This story has blown up on social media -- a report that says school officials at Fairfax County’s Centerville High School arranged and bankrolled abortions for girls without so much as a phone to their parents back in 2021.
The report says one of the two girls involved was 17 years old.
They're 'launching an investigation', which the past says means "We'll cover this up and make it go away as fast as we can." Which means there needs to be a criminal investigation by people they can't shut up.
Well, Virginia?
Thursday, August 07, 2025
Because I've been short on time, I thought I'd recommend some places
Some on the bloglist, some not:
A View from the Beach
A View from the Beach
Daley Gator, who has general stuff and lots of pretty women
The Other McCain, his own posts and lots of links.
If you don't know, Lawdog now has The Bugscuffle Gazette
One just ran across a week or two ago, the Village Hemorrhoid
And now, despite it being fairly hot out there, I need to go exercise, like it or not, because by the time it cools off it'll be too late in the evening.
The Other McCain, his own posts and lots of links.
If you don't know, Lawdog now has The Bugscuffle Gazette
One just ran across a week or two ago, the Village Hemorrhoid
And now, despite it being fairly hot out there, I need to go exercise, like it or not, because by the time it cools off it'll be too late in the evening.
If you need more reading material, Wirecutter's place has a long blogroll.
And he's really going to be missed when he finally decides to end it.
About the 'The left will really hate her now' post,
It seems Ms. Sweeney also likes working on her cars.
Damn, there's a lot to like about her.
Wednesday, August 06, 2025
Still a lack of time some days,
so intermittent posting.
Today, in that place the ancestors got the hell out of(for which I'm really grateful),
The UK is now censoring lawful speech on the internet!
Over the weekend:
A parliamentary speech made by Conservative MP Katie Lam, highlighting the horrors of grooming gang abuse and condemning the Government’s delay in launching local inquiries scandal, was taken out of the public conversation. Social media posts expressing support for single-sex spaces as essential to the safety of biological women were removed from the feeds of UK users of X.
Videos of a public demonstration raising concerns over the government’s handling of illegal channel crossings were made inaccessible. When concerned citizens, civil liberties groups, legal experts and others warned that the Act would be used to censor lawful speech and suppress dissent . . . ministers in successive Conservative governments insisted it was all about keeping children safe. They brushed aside warnings, framing every objection as a threat to child welfare and smearing defenders of free expression as if they were complicit in harm.
Now, just days into the Online Safety Act’s censorious powers coming into force, it’s clear our warnings were justified: legal speech is being suppressed for people of all ages.
We are deeply concerned that the Online Safety Act has handed the Government powers that belong in a dictatorship, not a democracy.
Christopher Joyce is absolutely right. All this is dictatorship, not democracy.
Take the blocking of footage of police actions against protesters. It becomes much easier for the police to get away with criminal acts themselves, like the police being the ones who instigate violence, or like the police selectively using very different tactics against different groups of protesters. In Essex, where I live, the police escorted in hard-left activist protesters and then denied they had done so. Only footage on social media proved that they were lying. Block citizens from sharing truth, and you block truth altogether.
As bad as the Online Safety Act is, it’s not the thing that creates absolute tyranny. The Crime and Policing Bill is the thing that creates absolute tyranny.
This is from the excellent Mick Bolton at his substack (he was sharing an article by commercial law professor Andrew Tettenborn):
Bad situation, very.
Today, in that place the ancestors got the hell out of(for which I'm really grateful),
The UK is now censoring lawful speech on the internet!
Over the weekend:
A parliamentary speech made by Conservative MP Katie Lam, highlighting the horrors of grooming gang abuse and condemning the Government’s delay in launching local inquiries scandal, was taken out of the public conversation. Social media posts expressing support for single-sex spaces as essential to the safety of biological women were removed from the feeds of UK users of X.
Videos of a public demonstration raising concerns over the government’s handling of illegal channel crossings were made inaccessible. When concerned citizens, civil liberties groups, legal experts and others warned that the Act would be used to censor lawful speech and suppress dissent . . . ministers in successive Conservative governments insisted it was all about keeping children safe. They brushed aside warnings, framing every objection as a threat to child welfare and smearing defenders of free expression as if they were complicit in harm.
Now, just days into the Online Safety Act’s censorious powers coming into force, it’s clear our warnings were justified: legal speech is being suppressed for people of all ages.
We are deeply concerned that the Online Safety Act has handed the Government powers that belong in a dictatorship, not a democracy.
Christopher Joyce is absolutely right. All this is dictatorship, not democracy.
Take the blocking of footage of police actions against protesters. It becomes much easier for the police to get away with criminal acts themselves, like the police being the ones who instigate violence, or like the police selectively using very different tactics against different groups of protesters. In Essex, where I live, the police escorted in hard-left activist protesters and then denied they had done so. Only footage on social media proved that they were lying. Block citizens from sharing truth, and you block truth altogether.
As bad as the Online Safety Act is, it’s not the thing that creates absolute tyranny. The Crime and Policing Bill is the thing that creates absolute tyranny.
This is from the excellent Mick Bolton at his substack (he was sharing an article by commercial law professor Andrew Tettenborn):
Bad situation, very.
Instapundit had a piece the other day on information getting out no matter what the .gov and cops do, and it just might get nasty. Probably. At some point the cops are going to show up and act like the sorry excuses for peace officers they've become, and are going to be told "No", and they're going to lose it and do something they'll REALLY want to cover up, and it won't work. Could say 'next step after the current start of the end'.
I just looked at the Daily Mail site, not one damned word about protests and such, or the actions and results of these new laws, which means they're being good little poodles. We'll see if it lasts.
Sunday, August 03, 2025
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)