Saturday, April 07, 2018
Friday, April 06, 2018
The weather went to crap today, definitely a good night (also, see note at end)
to be indoors and study
Busy, busy, etc.
not much the next few days. In the meantime,
The hell they don't want to take guns. And they don't like that 4th Amendment crap getting in the way. It should just take someone(neighbor, co-worker, pissed-off ex-girlfriend or wife or whatever) saying you're a problem to do it.
Liz Warren's a liar? This is my shocked face.
Top 10 Reasons Liberals Reflexively Blame the NRA for Shootings
"What's the FBI hiding?"
I don't have time to write that list.
And now I must get started on the weekend stuff.
The hell they don't want to take guns. And they don't like that 4th Amendment crap getting in the way. It should just take someone(neighbor, co-worker, pissed-off ex-girlfriend or wife or whatever) saying you're a problem to do it.
Liz Warren's a liar? This is my shocked face.
Top 10 Reasons Liberals Reflexively Blame the NRA for Shootings
"What's the FBI hiding?"
I don't have time to write that list.
And now I must get started on the weekend stuff.
Wednesday, April 04, 2018
More insanity from where Great Britain used to be
A 78-year-old homeowner has been arrested by murder detectives after a suspected burglar he fought with in his own kitchen died of a stab wound.
The pensioner, named locally as Richard Osborn-Brooks, was upstairs asleep with his wife when he was woken by the two men breaking into his suburban home in Hither Green, south-east London last night.
He was forced into his kitchen by one of the men, who was armed with a screwdriver, before a struggle ensued.
The intruder, a 38-year-old man, was left with wounds to his chest and local residents say he collapsed in a neighbouring road and died in hospital.
The homeowner was initially detained on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm but was later arrested on suspicion of murder.
Because, in (formerly Great)Britain, there's really no right of self-defense anymore*, as Kevin noted a few years back. Much like what much of the left wants here.
*Unless you're a protected species, such as the Sikhs protecting their places during the riots a few years ago
The pensioner, named locally as Richard Osborn-Brooks, was upstairs asleep with his wife when he was woken by the two men breaking into his suburban home in Hither Green, south-east London last night.
He was forced into his kitchen by one of the men, who was armed with a screwdriver, before a struggle ensued.
The intruder, a 38-year-old man, was left with wounds to his chest and local residents say he collapsed in a neighbouring road and died in hospital.
The homeowner was initially detained on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm but was later arrested on suspicion of murder.
Because, in (formerly Great)Britain, there's really no right of self-defense anymore*, as Kevin noted a few years back. Much like what much of the left wants here.
*Unless you're a protected species, such as the Sikhs protecting their places during the riots a few years ago
A crises. Over yoga...
No wonder these people are unhappy. The problem is they want EVERYONE ELSE to be unhappy, too.
There's an organized invasion group heading across Mexico to get to the US border.
Note that this is the Mexico that is very picky about arresting and deporting anyone who crosses THEIR sacred border. Unless they're helping them cross Mexico to get to the US(and I wonder what guards are watching to make sure none of them try to take a side trip or stay in Mexico?).
Their plan is to get here and demand 'amnesty'. The President is saying "Screw you, no" and planning to use the military to aid the Border Patrol in stopping them.
This ought to get interesting. The Democrats will scream about 'dreamers' and 'They just want a better life!', and everyone else will say "Don't let the bastards in! And if Mexico doesn't like it, that's their damned problem."
Screw just Comey & Co., why should we trust the EffingBI anymore?
But Comey provided zero transparency over the following 11 months prior to President Trump’s firing him last May. The FBI even redacted Mateen’s endorsement of ISIS in the initial transcripts they released of his discussions with hostage negotiators on the night of the shooting.
They're as bad as the Brit cops who won't talk about who actually runs the 'grooming' gangs because they're afraid of being called racist.
"Hey, I'm an advocate! So who cares if I get drunk on the job and molest people?
And if you do care, it's just because you want to stop my advocacy!"
There's an organized invasion group heading across Mexico to get to the US border.
Note that this is the Mexico that is very picky about arresting and deporting anyone who crosses THEIR sacred border. Unless they're helping them cross Mexico to get to the US(and I wonder what guards are watching to make sure none of them try to take a side trip or stay in Mexico?).
Their plan is to get here and demand 'amnesty'. The President is saying "Screw you, no" and planning to use the military to aid the Border Patrol in stopping them.
This ought to get interesting. The Democrats will scream about 'dreamers' and 'They just want a better life!', and everyone else will say "Don't let the bastards in! And if Mexico doesn't like it, that's their damned problem."
Screw just Comey & Co., why should we trust the EffingBI anymore?
But Comey provided zero transparency over the following 11 months prior to President Trump’s firing him last May. The FBI even redacted Mateen’s endorsement of ISIS in the initial transcripts they released of his discussions with hostage negotiators on the night of the shooting.
They're as bad as the Brit cops who won't talk about who actually runs the 'grooming' gangs because they're afraid of being called racist.
"Hey, I'm an advocate! So who cares if I get drunk on the job and molest people?
And if you do care, it's just because you want to stop my advocacy!"
Tuesday, April 03, 2018
In the place where Great Britain used to be,
Prosecutors told a Telford grooming victim's father they couldn't prosecute the alleged abuser because the 13-year-old had consented to have sex with the man, according to uncovered documents.
Yeah, that's why. I mean, why else wou- oh, yeah.
In early March, it was revealed a pair of whistle-blowers, who raised fears over the Telford child sex abuse scandal which affected up to 1,000 girls, were both punished and silenced.
Makes you wonder how many places this has actually happened in, and where it's still going on.
Yeah, that's why. I mean, why else wou- oh, yeah.
In early March, it was revealed a pair of whistle-blowers, who raised fears over the Telford child sex abuse scandal which affected up to 1,000 girls, were both punished and silenced.
According to the Mirror, police chaplain
Keith Osmund-Smith was suspended after he passed papers to the newspaper
and a report commissioned by the council revealed social workers knew
of the sex crimes before the turn of the millennium.
Meanwhile,
a woman who was hired by sex abuse charity Axis Counselling, based in
Shrewsbury, was forced to leave her role after she tried to speak up.
...
It is alleged that social workers first knew of abuse in the 1990s, but police took a decade before launching a probe.
Previously
unseen files apparently showed that council staff viewed abused and
trafficked children as 'prostitutes', not victims, and that the
authorities had failed to keep details of abusers from Asian communities
for fear of 'racism'.
Ah, the truth outs: they were too PC-at-any-cost, and too chickenshit, to actually deal with this.
How about giving the headmaster a flogging?
"My daughter was so massively bullied in her school in Frankfurt am Main by Muslim girls that we had to take her out of school for protection," the mother told the German newspaper Bild.
The mother said her daughter was harassed for a few reasons. "She had blond hair, no headscarf, has a German-Hebrew name — and we are Christians!" the mother said.
"My daughter broke down nervously in fifth grade," she continued. "She had bruises and massive fear of going to school."
The headmaster's response? "Your daughter does not have to say she is German. Besides, you can give her a headscarf!"
Ever notice that these assholes scream constantly about the threat of bullying, but when it's committed by a protected species, they're silent?
The mother said her daughter was harassed for a few reasons. "She had blond hair, no headscarf, has a German-Hebrew name — and we are Christians!" the mother said.
"My daughter broke down nervously in fifth grade," she continued. "She had bruises and massive fear of going to school."
The headmaster's response? "Your daughter does not have to say she is German. Besides, you can give her a headscarf!"
Ever notice that these assholes scream constantly about the threat of bullying, but when it's committed by a protected species, they're silent?
Monday, April 02, 2018
And while all those Democrats and journalists are yelling about guns
and kissing Hogg's ass, they're not having to talk about this.
Every one of the 44 House Democrats who hired Pakistan-born IT aides who later allegedly made “unauthorized access” to congressional data appears to have chosen to exempt them from background checks, according to congressional documents.
Among the red flags in Abid’s background were a $1.1 million bankruptcy; six lawsuits against him or a company he owned; and at least three misdemeanor convictions including for DUI and driving on a suspended license, according to Virginia court records. Public court records show that Imran and Abid operated a car dealership referred to as CIA that took $100,000 from an Iraqi government official who is a fugitive from U.S. authorities. Numerous members of the family were tied to cryptic LLCs such as New Dawn 2001, operated out of Imran’s residence, Virginia corporation records show. Imran was the subject of repeated calls to police by multiple women and had multiple misdemeanor convictions for driving offenses, according to court records.
Isn't that just interesting as hell?
Among the 44 employers, the primary advocate for the suspects has been Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, who introduced a bill Monday that would require background checks on Americans purchasing ammunition. “Without bullets a gun is just a hunk of useless metal,” she said, calling ammunition the “loophole” in gun control policy.
Wasserman Schultz was also chair of the Democratic National Committee when Wikileaks published its emails. (The Wikileaks emails show that DNC aides called Imran when they needed the password to her device.) Since then, she and other Democrats have described cyber breaches in the strongest possible terms, such as “an act of war” and “an assault on our democracy.”
But there is no indication Democrats put those concerns into practice when they entrusted the Pakistani dual citizens with their data, nor when suspicious activity was detected. Police banned the suspects from the network after the IG report, but Wasserman Schultz kept Imran on staff anyway. He was in the building and in possession of a laptop with the username RepDWS months later, according to an April 6, 2017 police report.
Someone was paying off or blackmailing someone, and a whole bunch of Democrats are right in the middle of it. Yet when was the last time most media talked about this?
I know, silly damned question, but I have to ask.
Every one of the 44 House Democrats who hired Pakistan-born IT aides who later allegedly made “unauthorized access” to congressional data appears to have chosen to exempt them from background checks, according to congressional documents.
Among the red flags in Abid’s background were a $1.1 million bankruptcy; six lawsuits against him or a company he owned; and at least three misdemeanor convictions including for DUI and driving on a suspended license, according to Virginia court records. Public court records show that Imran and Abid operated a car dealership referred to as CIA that took $100,000 from an Iraqi government official who is a fugitive from U.S. authorities. Numerous members of the family were tied to cryptic LLCs such as New Dawn 2001, operated out of Imran’s residence, Virginia corporation records show. Imran was the subject of repeated calls to police by multiple women and had multiple misdemeanor convictions for driving offenses, according to court records.
Isn't that just interesting as hell?
Among the 44 employers, the primary advocate for the suspects has been Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, who introduced a bill Monday that would require background checks on Americans purchasing ammunition. “Without bullets a gun is just a hunk of useless metal,” she said, calling ammunition the “loophole” in gun control policy.
Wasserman Schultz was also chair of the Democratic National Committee when Wikileaks published its emails. (The Wikileaks emails show that DNC aides called Imran when they needed the password to her device.) Since then, she and other Democrats have described cyber breaches in the strongest possible terms, such as “an act of war” and “an assault on our democracy.”
But there is no indication Democrats put those concerns into practice when they entrusted the Pakistani dual citizens with their data, nor when suspicious activity was detected. Police banned the suspects from the network after the IG report, but Wasserman Schultz kept Imran on staff anyway. He was in the building and in possession of a laptop with the username RepDWS months later, according to an April 6, 2017 police report.
Someone was paying off or blackmailing someone, and a whole bunch of Democrats are right in the middle of it. Yet when was the last time most media talked about this?
I know, silly damned question, but I have to ask.
"Why do liberals dislike poor blacks
and want them helpless?"
Because it's much harder to command people who don't depend on you to try to protect them. And because so many leftists have such a low opinion of blacks.
Because it's much harder to command people who don't depend on you to try to protect them. And because so many leftists have such a low opinion of blacks.
Actually listen to this: (updated)
whole bunch of tv news heads talking about the dangers of 'fake news'
and they're ALL reading the SAME DAMNED SCRIPT...
Update: I skimmed over some of this, and missed something: the company involved WAS using a script, promising not to allow fake news in, and calling out a lot of major media and places like Fecesbook for their crap. Which has caused a bunch of said media weenies to lose their shit.
Note to self: check everything out better than I sometimes do.
and they're ALL reading the SAME DAMNED SCRIPT...
Update: I skimmed over some of this, and missed something: the company involved WAS using a script, promising not to allow fake news in, and calling out a lot of major media and places like Fecesbook for their crap. Which has caused a bunch of said media weenies to lose their shit.
Note to self: check everything out better than I sometimes do.
Sunday, April 01, 2018
But since most of them aren't being shot, I'm sure someone will explain how their deaths
aren't as bad as someone who was killed with a bullet. Or something.
Two bits from this: first,
“It comes down to one simple thing, we’ve got to stop young people carrying knives in the first place,” he added.
I would beg to differ, which brings us to the second bit:
The Metropolitan Police commissioner, Cressida Dick, said last year that London’s crimewave was being driven by a “core group of young offenders” repeatedly committing assault and robbery “with relative impunity” and questioned whether tougher prison sentences could deter them.
Note 'core group' and 'with relative impunity'.
See the problem? The 'anti knife-crime charity' guy is worried about hardware, while the commissioner has a bit of an actual clue. But: chances of them continuing the 'Turn In Your Knife!' noise, and screwing with people carrying a basic tool for legal reasons, 100%. Chances of them actually dealing with the real problem, very low. Because that'd mean dealing with the facts that
The core problem is PEOPLE, not objects, and
Dealing with people means making judgements, and holding them to account, and all that messy stuff.
Lord, what a mess.
Two bits from this: first,
“It comes down to one simple thing, we’ve got to stop young people carrying knives in the first place,” he added.
I would beg to differ, which brings us to the second bit:
The Metropolitan Police commissioner, Cressida Dick, said last year that London’s crimewave was being driven by a “core group of young offenders” repeatedly committing assault and robbery “with relative impunity” and questioned whether tougher prison sentences could deter them.
Note 'core group' and 'with relative impunity'.
See the problem? The 'anti knife-crime charity' guy is worried about hardware, while the commissioner has a bit of an actual clue. But: chances of them continuing the 'Turn In Your Knife!' noise, and screwing with people carrying a basic tool for legal reasons, 100%. Chances of them actually dealing with the real problem, very low. Because that'd mean dealing with the facts that
The core problem is PEOPLE, not objects, and
Dealing with people means making judgements, and holding them to account, and all that messy stuff.
Lord, what a mess.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)