then warm front to dry it out. Nice evening out there, but there's data anyway.
Friday, October 14, 2016
You think maybe?
Congressional leaders investigating the FBI’s suspiciously inept
investigation of ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails are
turning their attention to FBI chief James Comey’s truthfulness. Did he mislead them? Did he perjure himself?
Damn well 'mislead' at the least. On 'perjure' there you get into legal definitions and he might be able to claim skating right on the edge but not actually crossing it. Either way, he failed the test.
So the Clinton crowd doesn't think Breitbart has a right to exist. Isn't that wonderful of them? Wonder how they'd react if someone connected with the Stupid Party said that, say, MSNBC has no right to exist?
You've got two choices: Obamacare was badly set up, is badly run, and needs to be stopped, or it's working exactly as desired so they can say "We need single-payer to fix this!"
Translation: "The Catholic Church needs to be made-over into a left-approved means of controlling people."
“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church.” – Sandy Newman, president and founder of the Voices for Progress, in an email to John Podesta, chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign for President.
In response, Podesta — a Catholic — tells Newman that structures have been put in place to work toward that end. A headline in the Washington Post would suggest that the line of thinking in these Wikileaks-obtained emails was mere joking, but the conversational back-and-forth appears to be in dead earnest.
If this information is correct, no wonder Clinton wants the e-mail mess to go away so badly: she told the bad guys exactly where the Ambassador would be.
And has lied about it ever since; consequences are for little people and minions.
This guy makes me want to pretend I only have a guitar for decoration
Damn well 'mislead' at the least. On 'perjure' there you get into legal definitions and he might be able to claim skating right on the edge but not actually crossing it. Either way, he failed the test.
So the Clinton crowd doesn't think Breitbart has a right to exist. Isn't that wonderful of them? Wonder how they'd react if someone connected with the Stupid Party said that, say, MSNBC has no right to exist?
You've got two choices: Obamacare was badly set up, is badly run, and needs to be stopped, or it's working exactly as desired so they can say "We need single-payer to fix this!"
Translation: "The Catholic Church needs to be made-over into a left-approved means of controlling people."
“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church.” – Sandy Newman, president and founder of the Voices for Progress, in an email to John Podesta, chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign for President.
In response, Podesta — a Catholic — tells Newman that structures have been put in place to work toward that end. A headline in the Washington Post would suggest that the line of thinking in these Wikileaks-obtained emails was mere joking, but the conversational back-and-forth appears to be in dead earnest.
If this information is correct, no wonder Clinton wants the e-mail mess to go away so badly: she told the bad guys exactly where the Ambassador would be.
And has lied about it ever since; consequences are for little people and minions.
This guy makes me want to pretend I only have a guitar for decoration
Thursday, October 13, 2016
Borrowing from Kevin(again), Lying. It's all that they've got.
By that measure, "gun control" results in "disproportionate harm
to communities of color," since places like Chicago with strict gun
control laws have astronomically high levels of death and injury by
gunshot. Ask the writer of this recent Pro Publica piece, How the Gun Control Debate Ignores Black Lives. But continuing:
But the New York Times' Editorial Board doesn't tell you that.
But the New York Times' Editorial Board doesn't tell you that, either.
There's more. Go read it.
And that leads into this crap on some of Clinton's intentions:
Further on in the video, Feingold says: “But what I do is I go with the majority view of the people of the state, which is very common sense. They believe there should be background checks. Overwhelmingly, they believe there should be background checks for the internet and for gun shows.”
You've only got two choices: Feingold has no damned idea what he's talking about, or he's lying. I'm going with lying, because at this point ANYBODY who's actually read ANYTHING on this knows that there is no gun show or internet loophole. If he's not lying, it means he's so pig-ignorant that he should not be allowed any influence on legislation. Considering the Evil Party anymore I'm strongly tempted to go with "Why not both?", but on this particular point, I think he's a damned liar.
Which brings up an interesting point: are they talking about an executive order to close a non-existent 'loophole'? Which would mean they're talking about "I Will Pass This Order!" that they know won't do anything, so they can simultaneously tell their supporters "See? We passed that order against the evil Gun Lobby!", will quietly pointing out to us "See? This doesn't actually hurt you!" Which, considering Clinton and the Evil Party and the example set by Obama, wouldn't surprise me at all. Which would mean that her supporters would be mad as hell when they realize what she's done to them.
Mr. Nixon, a Democrat, vetoed the measure in June, saying it would allow individuals with a criminal record to legally carry a concealed firearm even though they had been, or would have been, denied a permit under the old law’s background check.Which means he lied, since anyone with a felony record, or a conviction that could have resulted in a sentence exceeding one year (regardless of what sentence was actually handed down), or anyone under a domestic violence restraining order or found guilty of a domestic violence charge is - by Federal law - prohibited from possessing a firearm. Period. Doesn't matter how they carry it. So if their criminal record would have prevented them having a permit, it should prevent them from having a FIREARM.
But the New York Times' Editorial Board doesn't tell you that.
Mayors Sly James of Kansas City and Francis Slay of St. Louis warned against restricting the power of the local police to deny guns to those who commit domestic violence.And they lied too. It's FEDERAL law, and local police are quite empowered to enforce it.
But the New York Times' Editorial Board doesn't tell you that, either.
There's more. Go read it.
And that leads into this crap on some of Clinton's intentions:
Further on in the video, Feingold says: “But what I do is I go with the majority view of the people of the state, which is very common sense. They believe there should be background checks. Overwhelmingly, they believe there should be background checks for the internet and for gun shows.”
You've only got two choices: Feingold has no damned idea what he's talking about, or he's lying. I'm going with lying, because at this point ANYBODY who's actually read ANYTHING on this knows that there is no gun show or internet loophole. If he's not lying, it means he's so pig-ignorant that he should not be allowed any influence on legislation. Considering the Evil Party anymore I'm strongly tempted to go with "Why not both?", but on this particular point, I think he's a damned liar.
Which brings up an interesting point: are they talking about an executive order to close a non-existent 'loophole'? Which would mean they're talking about "I Will Pass This Order!" that they know won't do anything, so they can simultaneously tell their supporters "See? We passed that order against the evil Gun Lobby!", will quietly pointing out to us "See? This doesn't actually hurt you!" Which, considering Clinton and the Evil Party and the example set by Obama, wouldn't surprise me at all. Which would mean that her supporters would be mad as hell when they realize what she's done to them.
Kevin has written more than once about this,
and here's confirmation of what the left has been after.
How does this get handled in the general? Secretary Clinton is not an entertainer, and not a celebrity in the Trump, Kardashian mold; what can she do to offset this? I'm certain the poll-directed insiders are sure things will default to policy as soon as the conventions are over, but I think not.
And as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking - and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.
How does this get handled in the general? Secretary Clinton is not an entertainer, and not a celebrity in the Trump, Kardashian mold; what can she do to offset this? I'm certain the poll-directed insiders are sure things will default to policy as soon as the conventions are over, but I think not.
And as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking - and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.
How much you want to bet he's been on the 'get rid of guns' bandwagon?
Weeks after a firearm was allegedly found in his backpack at LAX,
rapper Coolio has been charged in the case, the Los Angeles County
District Attorney’s Office said Thursday.
Coolio faces a felony count of possession of a firearm by a felon with two prior convictions, according to a DA’s news release. He was convicted in 2001 of carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle, and in 2009 on a charge of possessing a cocaine base.
I do believe the man is in some serious trouble.
And I wonder how many of the 'Get rid of guns and crack down on gun violence!' people will say he deserves leniency?
Coolio faces a felony count of possession of a firearm by a felon with two prior convictions, according to a DA’s news release. He was convicted in 2001 of carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle, and in 2009 on a charge of possessing a cocaine base.
I do believe the man is in some serious trouble.
And I wonder how many of the 'Get rid of guns and crack down on gun violence!' people will say he deserves leniency?
This is one of the more flat-out lying-bastard stupid things I've ever heard,
and considering this election season that's saying a lot. And if you wanted more proof that the UN is largely run by a bunch of Jew-hating assholes, here it is:
The UN passed a resolution Thursday denying the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount and the Western Wall
The resolution was supported by 24 states, including Russia and China. 6 countries opposed and 26 abstained.
The resolution maintains that the Western Wall and Temple Mount will be referred to by their Arabic names and the Hebrew terms for the sites will only appear in quotation marks in UN references.
Got that? All that history, going back before the Romans? Doesn't matter: the Jew-haters don't care, and the others want to support the Palestinians for whatever reason.
We really need to de-infest that building in New York.
The UN passed a resolution Thursday denying the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount and the Western Wall
The resolution was supported by 24 states, including Russia and China. 6 countries opposed and 26 abstained.
The resolution maintains that the Western Wall and Temple Mount will be referred to by their Arabic names and the Hebrew terms for the sites will only appear in quotation marks in UN references.
Got that? All that history, going back before the Romans? Doesn't matter: the Jew-haters don't care, and the others want to support the Palestinians for whatever reason.
We really need to de-infest that building in New York.
Once more: Facebook is full of crap
And they don't bother to check where you're logging in from. I'd been busy the last few days, and while in another city, on a different PC, tried to log on and got the "We think you're infected" crap. So, no Fecesbood for the foreseeable future.
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
If pants did catch on fire, Obama would have third-degree burns on his ass
In March 2015, The New York Times reported that Obama said he didn’t know Clinton was using a private email address. That turned out to be false, as the second FBI report on their investigation into Clinton’s private server revealed that the president used a pseudonym in email communications with her. “How is this not classified?” Clinton aide Huma Abedin asked the FBI during their interview. Obama’s use of a pseudonym suggests he not only was aware of Clinton’s private server, but he knew it wasn’t secured to communicate with Clinton, as there were no security officers to mark the correspondence as classified.
Obama’s administration has intervened to delay several FOIA requests until after Election Day to shield Clinton from further scrutiny.
In October 2015, the White House stopped the release of emails between Clinton and Obama, citing the need to keep presidential communications confidential.
And on, and on.
Standard: "People shouldn't be allowed to own guns! Except for my security guards, of course; that's different, I'm not carrying a gun, I'm paying other people to do it for me."
Remember Gruber, the 'Americans are too stupid' MIT professor who put Obamacare together? He says Hillary has a GREAT! plan. Guess what that means?
This election summed up:
So many leaked emails, so little time...
Oh, and Facebook? I'm supposedly 'infected', but you're doing this? Screw you.
He made the mistake of thinking the snowflakes actually care about free speech.
The world-historical irony of the situation is not lost on Goldberg.
“In their quest to try and stop me from altering the school’s policies, they broke almost every single one of them,” the sophomore told the Fix. “Students not only abused me online, but also in public, in class, and over email.”
“I want to engage in debate,” he added. “I assumed that a group of 18 to 24 year olds would understand the First Amendment, but I was wrong.”
“It’s incredibly ironic to me that they violated almost all of the speech codes in trying to prevent me from eliminating the speech codes.”
Apparently shaming other women is fine if they don't have the preferred political beliefs, or are a threat to a favored politician.
More on that nonexistent vote fraud we're not supposed to worry about.
Noisy training with interesting stuff
Obama’s administration has intervened to delay several FOIA requests until after Election Day to shield Clinton from further scrutiny.
In October 2015, the White House stopped the release of emails between Clinton and Obama, citing the need to keep presidential communications confidential.
And on, and on.
Standard: "People shouldn't be allowed to own guns! Except for my security guards, of course; that's different, I'm not carrying a gun, I'm paying other people to do it for me."
Remember Gruber, the 'Americans are too stupid' MIT professor who put Obamacare together? He says Hillary has a GREAT! plan. Guess what that means?
This election summed up:
So many leaked emails, so little time...
Oh, and Facebook? I'm supposedly 'infected', but you're doing this? Screw you.
He made the mistake of thinking the snowflakes actually care about free speech.
The world-historical irony of the situation is not lost on Goldberg.
“In their quest to try and stop me from altering the school’s policies, they broke almost every single one of them,” the sophomore told the Fix. “Students not only abused me online, but also in public, in class, and over email.”
“I want to engage in debate,” he added. “I assumed that a group of 18 to 24 year olds would understand the First Amendment, but I was wrong.”
“It’s incredibly ironic to me that they violated almost all of the speech codes in trying to prevent me from eliminating the speech codes.”
Apparently shaming other women is fine if they don't have the preferred political beliefs, or are a threat to a favored politician.
More on that nonexistent vote fraud we're not supposed to worry about.
Noisy training with interesting stuff
Monday, October 10, 2016
Meanwhile, in France,
It’s all heating up south of Paris, where car-b-que season is underway earlier than usual.
This time police were actually inside the cars when they were set ablaze:
and
Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said on Thursday that three women aged between 19 and 39 were arrested in connection with the discovery of six gas cylinders in the French capital on Sunday.
Cazeneuve said the suspects were "radicalized fanatics" who were preparing "new violent … and imminent actions."
The French have got to be sweating blood wondering where the next 'migrants' will manage to complete an attack. And the Germans are right there with them. Every other government in Europe is not exactly in a calm state of mind on this, either.
This time police were actually inside the cars when they were set ablaze:
and
Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said on Thursday that three women aged between 19 and 39 were arrested in connection with the discovery of six gas cylinders in the French capital on Sunday.
Cazeneuve said the suspects were "radicalized fanatics" who were preparing "new violent … and imminent actions."
The French have got to be sweating blood wondering where the next 'migrants' will manage to complete an attack. And the Germans are right there with them. Every other government in Europe is not exactly in a calm state of mind on this, either.
Readiness is in the toilet, fewer ships, etc., but Mabus has plenty of time
to play PC games with names.
As of last week, the U.S. Navy is dropping all job titles that include the word “man.” A chief yeoman will become just a chief. “Fire Controlmen” will become nondescript “Petty Officers.” To avoid insult, “sailors will no longer be identified by their job title,” says the Navy Times; the titles “airman, fireman, constructionman and hospitalman” will be “replaced by job codes”; “B320” or “B450” or some other colorless non-word.
All this because no one has told Navy secretary, Ray Mabus, that the suffix “man” does not necessarily mean male.
I'm sure he knows; he doesn't care. Apparently this is more important than the actual PROBLEMS the Navy has. And the Marines, don't forget he's been playing the same games there, too.
There've been surveys showing people aren't holding Globular Warmering/Climate Changing the huge problem the Greenies want it to be seen as, and they're getting a bit desperate.
You may not have noticed, but 2016 was the hottest year for over 100,000 years. At least this was the claim reported last week by The Guardian, under the headline “Planet at its hottest for 115,000 years thanks fo climate change, experts say”.
The “experts” in question are a bunch of US scientists led by James Hansen, the former Nasa employee who did so much to set the great global warming scare on its way in 1988. And of course such a claim could only be made by ignoring all the evidence that the earth was actually hotter than today during the Mediaeval Warm Period, less than 1,000 years ago, and even more so during the thousands of years of the Holocene Optimum, following its emergence from the last ice age 10,000 years ago.
Now those “100 months” are up, it has prompted the diligent Paul Homewood to publish on his website, Not A Lot of People Know That, a set of graphs meticulously compiled from official data. The show what has actually happened to the earth’s climate in these past eight years. Despite the 2016 El Nino spike, now rapidly declining, satellite measurements still show that the trend in global temperatures has not risen for 18 years.
As of last week, the U.S. Navy is dropping all job titles that include the word “man.” A chief yeoman will become just a chief. “Fire Controlmen” will become nondescript “Petty Officers.” To avoid insult, “sailors will no longer be identified by their job title,” says the Navy Times; the titles “airman, fireman, constructionman and hospitalman” will be “replaced by job codes”; “B320” or “B450” or some other colorless non-word.
All this because no one has told Navy secretary, Ray Mabus, that the suffix “man” does not necessarily mean male.
I'm sure he knows; he doesn't care. Apparently this is more important than the actual PROBLEMS the Navy has. And the Marines, don't forget he's been playing the same games there, too.
There've been surveys showing people aren't holding Globular Warmering/Climate Changing the huge problem the Greenies want it to be seen as, and they're getting a bit desperate.
You may not have noticed, but 2016 was the hottest year for over 100,000 years. At least this was the claim reported last week by The Guardian, under the headline “Planet at its hottest for 115,000 years thanks fo climate change, experts say”.
The “experts” in question are a bunch of US scientists led by James Hansen, the former Nasa employee who did so much to set the great global warming scare on its way in 1988. And of course such a claim could only be made by ignoring all the evidence that the earth was actually hotter than today during the Mediaeval Warm Period, less than 1,000 years ago, and even more so during the thousands of years of the Holocene Optimum, following its emergence from the last ice age 10,000 years ago.
Now those “100 months” are up, it has prompted the diligent Paul Homewood to publish on his website, Not A Lot of People Know That, a set of graphs meticulously compiled from official data. The show what has actually happened to the earth’s climate in these past eight years. Despite the 2016 El Nino spike, now rapidly declining, satellite measurements still show that the trend in global temperatures has not risen for 18 years.
Sunday, October 09, 2016
This is friggin' marvelous
Actual launch starts about 51 minutes in
Not only did the escape test go perfectly, but even with all that going off in the nose, the booster just keeps going. And bleeping LANDS perfectly.
Well done, guys.
Not only did the escape test go perfectly, but even with all that going off in the nose, the booster just keeps going. And bleeping LANDS perfectly.
Well done, guys.
A visit to Wirecutter, then a visit to Angel's place, and
some other things saved up I need to share. Starting with, since I'm a little worried about Erin and haven't heard anything for a couple of days, a suggestion for her future hurricane prep kit:
If I actually find this in the store, I need to find out where the hunting ground is
The actual job creation record of our President:
And right now, I want to go here
When you realize you don't need gas all that bad...
If I actually find this in the store, I need to find out where the hunting ground is
The actual job creation record of our President:
And right now, I want to go here
When you realize you don't need gas all that bad...
Weight distribution on a trailer
is a very important thing, and here's a beautiful demonstration why
To every idiot who insists "Obamacare is better than what we had!",
if you're still saying that, you're not an idiot: you're actually willfully stupid.
Before Obamacare, we paid $481 per month for decent health insurance. Just got notice that we will have to pay $1140 PER MONTH next year!!! I am not kidding and yes you read that right…..that’s a mortgage payment! On top of that, we will now have a $6550 deductible per person with no prescriptions covered.
There's more, if you can stand it.
Before Obamacare, we paid $481 per month for decent health insurance. Just got notice that we will have to pay $1140 PER MONTH next year!!! I am not kidding and yes you read that right…..that’s a mortgage payment! On top of that, we will now have a $6550 deductible per person with no prescriptions covered.
There's more, if you can stand it.
It's not just that Hollywood keeps remaking things,
they far too often screw them up. Badly.
The commercials for The Magnificent Seven had pretty much decided me, but this brings it to "I'll see it- maybe- when it's on tv."
This kind of crap is why I keep wishing they'd make a real movie of the Matt Helm books, or Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser, and then dreading the idea because of what they'd probably do to them.
The commercials for The Magnificent Seven had pretty much decided me, but this brings it to "I'll see it- maybe- when it's on tv."
This kind of crap is why I keep wishing they'd make a real movie of the Matt Helm books, or Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser, and then dreading the idea because of what they'd probably do to them.
There are various stories out there that some Very Special Agents
of the EffingBI are 'close to revolt' over Comey's crap. Both giving Clinton & Co. the breaks he did, and then trying to blame the investigating agents for the problems.
Big whoop.
You might recall that there were stories that 'lot of agents are threatening to retire/resign if Clinton is not recommended for prosecution'. You hear of any masses of agents retiring and speaking out, or resigning? Me neither. The only ones quoted as speaking out are retired agents; no currently-serving are openly saying anything.
And they won't. It would threaten their jobs, and cause them to be labeled troublemakers and subject to being transferred to less-desirable assignments. Even if their bosses agree with them, they would have committed the cardinal sin:
I can't find the exact quote, but in one of the Joe Leaphorn mysteries he's reflecting on working with the FBI and thinks that there are two things that will get a FBI agent in real trouble: bringing bad publicity, no matter how small, on the Bureau, and having an original thought. And even, as noted, if their supervisor agrees with them on what Comey & Co. have done, to say anything in public would be the primary sin of Bad Publicity for the Sacred Bureau. So they won't do it. At least not yet.
We're looking at a national-level version of the standard problem in law enforcement: someone may be a corrupt, nasty bastard, but most officers won't want to report them or testify against them because "He may be a dirty bastard, but he's one of us." Maybe the damage to the EffingBI in particular and law enforcement in general may get bad enough that some will say "Enough, I have to say something." We'll see.
Am I being unfair? I don't think so. Comey's not stupid, he had to know the damage his dog & pony show on Clinton would do both to his agency and confidence in the Justice Department. Especially that idiot "Just because we're no recommending prosecution of Clinton, don't think we won't prosecute anyone else who does the same things!" statement. That's literally standing in a national forum and saying "The commoners will certainly be prosecuted for the same acts!" Which goes over about as well as you'd expect. It's like he actually believed he could say that without causing even more damage than had already been done. Which would seem to rank him in the 'insane' or 'stupid' column. Maybe he knew the damage he'd do, and somehow thought that this would limit it?
Couldn't be, not unless he actually IS stupid. Or indulging in a destructive level if wishful thinking, because that statement made it worse. Far worse. Having the thought that there are official 'special rules for special people' is bad, and corrosive; having the special rules rubbed in your face is worse. Far worse. It's saying "Yeah, she's rich and connected so she gets special treatment. Deal with it, peasants." right out in the open. And that's on top of the crap with BATF(Fast & Furious and the other gunrunning operations and NOBODY except the whistleblowers getting in trouble), the IRS(breaking its own rules and federal law, and then telling Congress "Screw you, do something about it"), the garbage the Dept. of 'Justice' has been caught in, culminating in the AG 'accidentally' spending time with Bill Clinton just before Comey's announcement. And now the insult of these bastards telling us "If YOU violate a law or regulation, even one you don't know about, YOU will be screwed to the wall, because YOU peasants aren't rich and connected." Throw in the VA mess: openly violating federal laws, faking records, not giving a damn how many vets die just trying to get a damned appointment, and nobody fired, nobody prosecuted...
Added: throw in Obamacare. Throw in the architect on tape laughing about lying to people and calling them stupid. Throw in the "If you like your plan" lies, told over and over. Throw in the collapsing exchanges, the skyrocketing prices, and every asshole involved and cheering them on insisting the real fix is "More Government Control!"
Sarah Hoyt is a sci-fi writer, and she's kind of upbeat: "Yes, things are bad, but they CAN be repaired." After this, I'm really not sure; if some kind of serious cleaning-out of all these agencies within the next, say, 2-3 years, it may not be fixable. The damage to the belief that it CAN be fixed, that the government CAN be returned to serving the people, may be too great to fix.
Big whoop.
You might recall that there were stories that 'lot of agents are threatening to retire/resign if Clinton is not recommended for prosecution'. You hear of any masses of agents retiring and speaking out, or resigning? Me neither. The only ones quoted as speaking out are retired agents; no currently-serving are openly saying anything.
And they won't. It would threaten their jobs, and cause them to be labeled troublemakers and subject to being transferred to less-desirable assignments. Even if their bosses agree with them, they would have committed the cardinal sin:
I can't find the exact quote, but in one of the Joe Leaphorn mysteries he's reflecting on working with the FBI and thinks that there are two things that will get a FBI agent in real trouble: bringing bad publicity, no matter how small, on the Bureau, and having an original thought. And even, as noted, if their supervisor agrees with them on what Comey & Co. have done, to say anything in public would be the primary sin of Bad Publicity for the Sacred Bureau. So they won't do it. At least not yet.
We're looking at a national-level version of the standard problem in law enforcement: someone may be a corrupt, nasty bastard, but most officers won't want to report them or testify against them because "He may be a dirty bastard, but he's one of us." Maybe the damage to the EffingBI in particular and law enforcement in general may get bad enough that some will say "Enough, I have to say something." We'll see.
Am I being unfair? I don't think so. Comey's not stupid, he had to know the damage his dog & pony show on Clinton would do both to his agency and confidence in the Justice Department. Especially that idiot "Just because we're no recommending prosecution of Clinton, don't think we won't prosecute anyone else who does the same things!" statement. That's literally standing in a national forum and saying "The commoners will certainly be prosecuted for the same acts!" Which goes over about as well as you'd expect. It's like he actually believed he could say that without causing even more damage than had already been done. Which would seem to rank him in the 'insane' or 'stupid' column. Maybe he knew the damage he'd do, and somehow thought that this would limit it?
Couldn't be, not unless he actually IS stupid. Or indulging in a destructive level if wishful thinking, because that statement made it worse. Far worse. Having the thought that there are official 'special rules for special people' is bad, and corrosive; having the special rules rubbed in your face is worse. Far worse. It's saying "Yeah, she's rich and connected so she gets special treatment. Deal with it, peasants." right out in the open. And that's on top of the crap with BATF(Fast & Furious and the other gunrunning operations and NOBODY except the whistleblowers getting in trouble), the IRS(breaking its own rules and federal law, and then telling Congress "Screw you, do something about it"), the garbage the Dept. of 'Justice' has been caught in, culminating in the AG 'accidentally' spending time with Bill Clinton just before Comey's announcement. And now the insult of these bastards telling us "If YOU violate a law or regulation, even one you don't know about, YOU will be screwed to the wall, because YOU peasants aren't rich and connected." Throw in the VA mess: openly violating federal laws, faking records, not giving a damn how many vets die just trying to get a damned appointment, and nobody fired, nobody prosecuted...
Added: throw in Obamacare. Throw in the architect on tape laughing about lying to people and calling them stupid. Throw in the "If you like your plan" lies, told over and over. Throw in the collapsing exchanges, the skyrocketing prices, and every asshole involved and cheering them on insisting the real fix is "More Government Control!"
Sarah Hoyt is a sci-fi writer, and she's kind of upbeat: "Yes, things are bad, but they CAN be repaired." After this, I'm really not sure; if some kind of serious cleaning-out of all these agencies within the next, say, 2-3 years, it may not be fixable. The damage to the belief that it CAN be fixed, that the government CAN be returned to serving the people, may be too great to fix.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















































