You think maybe?

Congressional leaders investigating the FBI’s suspiciously inept investigation of ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails are turning their attention to FBI chief James Comey’s truthfulness. Did he mislead them? Did he perjure himself?
Damn well 'mislead' at the least.  On 'perjure' there you get into legal definitions and he might be able to claim skating right on the edge but not actually crossing it.  Either way, he failed the test.


So the Clinton crowd doesn't think Breitbart has a right to exist.  Isn't that wonderful of them?  Wonder how they'd react if someone connected with the Stupid Party said that, say, MSNBC has no right to exist?


You've got two choices: Obamacare was badly set up, is badly run, and needs to be stopped, or it's working exactly as desired so they can say "We need single-payer to fix this!"


Translation: "The Catholic Church needs to be made-over into a left-approved means of controlling people."
“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church.” – Sandy Newman, president and founder of the Voices for Progress, in an email to John Podesta, chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign for President.

In response, Podesta — a Catholic — tells Newman that structures have been put in place to work toward that end. A headline in the Washington Post would suggest that the line of thinking in these Wikileaks-obtained emails was mere joking, but the conversational back-and-forth appears to be in dead earnest.


If this information is correct, no wonder Clinton wants the e-mail mess to go away so badly: she told the bad guys exactly where the Ambassador would be.

And has lied about it ever since; consequences are for little people and minions.


This guy makes me want to pretend I only have a guitar for decoration