Saturday, January 27, 2018
I never find stuff like this in the attic
An important twelfth-century Japanese sword, discovered hidden in the ceiling during a 1939 refurbishment of the treasure house at Kasuga
Taisha shrine in Nara, will now be put on display.
And a lovely thing it is.
And a lovely thing it is.
Looks like the situation in Sweden is getting harder and harder to gloss over
Sweden is among the world’s safest, richest and best-run countries
enjoying steady growth and rising employment. But it has been experiencing an unprecedented surge of bombings and sexual assaults.
In a country of 10m people, more than 320 shootings and dozens of bombings were reported in 2017, along with more than 110 murders and 7,226 rapes — a 10% increase on 2016. More than 36% of young Swedish women say they feel unsafe at night.
Whyever might that be?
The crime surge is mainly confined to so-called “areas of social exclusion”, a code for neighbourhoods such as Rosengard that are predominantly populated by immigrants. They are not classic ghettos — the infrastructure and services are better than in areas of central London — but these communities are plagued by high crime rates and unemployment.
In Malmo, where a fifth of the 340,000 inhabitants are under 18, children as young as 14 roam the streets with Kalashnikov assault rifles and bulletproof vests.
In Sweden. Multi-culti 'all cultures are equal' and 'They have solved the gun problem!' Sweden.
From another article:
Last month, even the New York Times got into the act. Sort of. On December 10, it reported on a Molotov cocktail attack on a Gothenburg synagogue. Of course, being the Times, it managed to sidestep the words Muslim and Islam even though it was clear what was going on: “about 10 young people...began setting fire to objects and throwing them at the synagogue”; the cops “arrested three men in their 20s”; this followed an anti-Israel protest in which participants waved “Palestinian flags” and “yelled that they were going to shoot Jews” and threatened a Malmö “intifada” in Arabic.
Wonder how long the "There is no problem, and anyone who says there is will be arrested!" crap is going to continue, with stuff like this happening more and more?
In a country of 10m people, more than 320 shootings and dozens of bombings were reported in 2017, along with more than 110 murders and 7,226 rapes — a 10% increase on 2016. More than 36% of young Swedish women say they feel unsafe at night.
Whyever might that be?
The crime surge is mainly confined to so-called “areas of social exclusion”, a code for neighbourhoods such as Rosengard that are predominantly populated by immigrants. They are not classic ghettos — the infrastructure and services are better than in areas of central London — but these communities are plagued by high crime rates and unemployment.
In Malmo, where a fifth of the 340,000 inhabitants are under 18, children as young as 14 roam the streets with Kalashnikov assault rifles and bulletproof vests.
In Sweden. Multi-culti 'all cultures are equal' and 'They have solved the gun problem!' Sweden.
From another article:
Last month, even the New York Times got into the act. Sort of. On December 10, it reported on a Molotov cocktail attack on a Gothenburg synagogue. Of course, being the Times, it managed to sidestep the words Muslim and Islam even though it was clear what was going on: “about 10 young people...began setting fire to objects and throwing them at the synagogue”; the cops “arrested three men in their 20s”; this followed an anti-Israel protest in which participants waved “Palestinian flags” and “yelled that they were going to shoot Jews” and threatened a Malmö “intifada” in Arabic.
Wonder how long the "There is no problem, and anyone who says there is will be arrested!" crap is going to continue, with stuff like this happening more and more?
Interesting...
This looks like Trump is about to kick the Democrats in the ass again. Those under DACA would not get to pass legal immigrants to get in, they'd have to keep their record clean, no chain immigration, and more border controls...
He wasn't my choice, but I'll admit he's been a lot better than I'd hoped, on a number of things.
And he drives the progzis nuts on a number of subjects; I swear, if he said 'Drinking more water is good for you!' there'd be a flurry of "STOP DRINKING WATER! TRUMPHITLER LIKES WATER" screams going around.
He wasn't my choice, but I'll admit he's been a lot better than I'd hoped, on a number of things.
And he drives the progzis nuts on a number of subjects; I swear, if he said 'Drinking more water is good for you!' there'd be a flurry of "STOP DRINKING WATER! TRUMPHITLER LIKES WATER" screams going around.
Friday, January 26, 2018
Judges and prosecutors who need to be flogged, then hanged
The criminal justice system's treatment of Tigano is appalling. During
his nearly seven-year pretrial incarceration, Tigano loudly and
repeatedly invoked his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Because Tigano kept bringing up the Sixth Amendment, he was forced to undergo three separate court-ordered examinations to determine whether he was competent to be tried. According to one of the prosecutors involved in
the case, "Mr. Tigano III had been sort of demanding his speedy trial,
which is part of the prompting for the Court sending him out for this
evaluation." Tigano passed all three exams with flying colors.
For demanding the 6th be followed? Mental exams?
Tigano's ordeal illuminates a much bigger problem. Consider what Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Duszkiewicz had to say about the third competency examination that Tigano was forced to undergo. It was sparked "not necessarily [by] the competency question," Duszkiewicz said, "but [by] whether there is some other psychological problem that's going to prevent [Tigano] from understanding the difference between what he potentially looks at as far as a conviction as well as what's being offered by way of this plea."
Translation: Federal prosecutors piled on the charges expecting Tigano to plead guilty to a lesser offense and save everybody the trouble of going to trial. The prosecutors also let it be known that if Tigano rejected their deal, they would throw the book at him and he would forfeit his shot at "what's being offered by way of this plea." In short, sacrifice your Sixth Amendment rights and you'll do less time.
Hang the bastards. Every damned one of them.
For demanding the 6th be followed? Mental exams?
Tigano's ordeal illuminates a much bigger problem. Consider what Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Duszkiewicz had to say about the third competency examination that Tigano was forced to undergo. It was sparked "not necessarily [by] the competency question," Duszkiewicz said, "but [by] whether there is some other psychological problem that's going to prevent [Tigano] from understanding the difference between what he potentially looks at as far as a conviction as well as what's being offered by way of this plea."
Translation: Federal prosecutors piled on the charges expecting Tigano to plead guilty to a lesser offense and save everybody the trouble of going to trial. The prosecutors also let it be known that if Tigano rejected their deal, they would throw the book at him and he would forfeit his shot at "what's being offered by way of this plea." In short, sacrifice your Sixth Amendment rights and you'll do less time.
Hang the bastards. Every damned one of them.
I keep seeing former EffingBI agents saying
"The Republicans just want to damage the Bureau", or "are harming the Bureau's ability to do its job", and so forth.
Be nice if they made some statements about the slimeballs in the sacred Bureau who are the CAUSE of all this crap.
Be nice if they made some statements about the slimeballs in the sacred Bureau who are the CAUSE of all this crap.
Because enough idiots are in Denver, and they're led by fools
who probably "Praise Science!" but think they can legislate changes.
The Green Roof Initiative, or Initiative 300, mandates new and existing buildings, 25,000 square feet or more, include a green roof or a combination of green roof and solar energy.
Brandon Rietheimer, the campaign manager who gathered signatures to get the Denver Green Roof Initiative onto the ballot, says he was inspired by Bernie Sanders's climate message.(well, there's part of the problem- and evidence of stupid- right there) According to Rietheimer, the initiative is designed to combat the Urban Heat Island effect where rooftops, pavement, parking lots and roads absorb the sun's rays.
"What we're trying to do is really return the city to pre-development conditions by adding green space and that will lower temperatures," he said.
'pre-development conditions'. He actually thinks roof gardens will do that...
And the stupid continues:
Both sides of the issue acknowledge up-front costs of green roofs are expensive. According to estimates from real estate and construction experts, green roofs in Colorado could cost $25 to 35 per square foot (not including plants, water costs or maintenance), compared to $15 a square foot for standard, thermoplastic polyolefin single-ply (TPO) roofing with flashings.
Note: that's to build a new roof, NOT to retrofit a new one.
But Rietheimer said there is a return on investment of six years for green roofs and roof longevity is doubled, or even tripled.
Maybe. ON NEW ROOFS. And I'm wondering where he got those numbers, because they sound like bullshit.
And, hey, Colorado is a place where you can be fined for catching rainwater in a barrel; I wonder how they're going to deal with buildings trapping all that rainwater on the roof(until they collapse, at least)?
Jeez.
The Green Roof Initiative, or Initiative 300, mandates new and existing buildings, 25,000 square feet or more, include a green roof or a combination of green roof and solar energy.
Brandon Rietheimer, the campaign manager who gathered signatures to get the Denver Green Roof Initiative onto the ballot, says he was inspired by Bernie Sanders's climate message.(well, there's part of the problem- and evidence of stupid- right there) According to Rietheimer, the initiative is designed to combat the Urban Heat Island effect where rooftops, pavement, parking lots and roads absorb the sun's rays.
"What we're trying to do is really return the city to pre-development conditions by adding green space and that will lower temperatures," he said.
'pre-development conditions'. He actually thinks roof gardens will do that...
And the stupid continues:
Both sides of the issue acknowledge up-front costs of green roofs are expensive. According to estimates from real estate and construction experts, green roofs in Colorado could cost $25 to 35 per square foot (not including plants, water costs or maintenance), compared to $15 a square foot for standard, thermoplastic polyolefin single-ply (TPO) roofing with flashings.
Note: that's to build a new roof, NOT to retrofit a new one.
But Rietheimer said there is a return on investment of six years for green roofs and roof longevity is doubled, or even tripled.
Maybe. ON NEW ROOFS. And I'm wondering where he got those numbers, because they sound like bullshit.
And, hey, Colorado is a place where you can be fined for catching rainwater in a barrel; I wonder how they're going to deal with buildings trapping all that rainwater on the roof(until they collapse, at least)?
Jeez.
Thursday, January 25, 2018
Because all the actual problems are solved.
Or it's just that Californicated is run by effing idiots, which is far more likely.
Brought to you by the Dark and Fascist State of New Jersey.
And I'll bet every chief in every department involved whines about 'why don't people trust and respect us?'
Hey, Zuckerbitch, part of the plan or just some minions overstepping?
"I didn't mean I should pay more in taxes!"
Brought to you by the Dark and Fascist State of New Jersey.
And I'll bet every chief in every department involved whines about 'why don't people trust and respect us?'
Hey, Zuckerbitch, part of the plan or just some minions overstepping?
"I didn't mean I should pay more in taxes!"
Things like this are why someone announcing 'Child Protective Services'
should result in locking the door and calling a lawyer. Possibly opening fire.
EVERY idiot involved in this, from the cops to the CPS clowns, should be fired. And the CPS clowns should then be flogged through the town, and then hanged.
“The social workers did not have reasonable cause to believe the children were at risk of serious bodily harm or molestation,” a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit wrote. “Therefore, viewing the record most favorably to the Demarees, the defendants acted unconstitutionally in taking the three children away from home without judicial authorization.”
And just how did that happen?
...Anticipating child exploitation charges to be brought, she decided to take the children into emergency temporary custody. Though she lacked a court order or warrant, her supervisor approved the decision. The two older children were driven to one foster home, the 18-month-old to another, according to court documents. Eventually, they were moved to their grandparents’ house.
Whipping post. Whip. Noose. CPS clowns; some assembly required.
EVERY idiot involved in this, from the cops to the CPS clowns, should be fired. And the CPS clowns should then be flogged through the town, and then hanged.
“The social workers did not have reasonable cause to believe the children were at risk of serious bodily harm or molestation,” a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit wrote. “Therefore, viewing the record most favorably to the Demarees, the defendants acted unconstitutionally in taking the three children away from home without judicial authorization.”
And just how did that happen?
...Anticipating child exploitation charges to be brought, she decided to take the children into emergency temporary custody. Though she lacked a court order or warrant, her supervisor approved the decision. The two older children were driven to one foster home, the 18-month-old to another, according to court documents. Eventually, they were moved to their grandparents’ house.
Whipping post. Whip. Noose. CPS clowns; some assembly required.
Few days ago
rolled the bike out, because the next couple of days would be good riding weather.
Find nail in back tire.
Hunt around, find new tire, get installed.
This morning, drop tire gauge. Then find it's reading wonky.
Joy.
Find nail in back tire.
Hunt around, find new tire, get installed.
This morning, drop tire gauge. Then find it's reading wonky.
Joy.
Wednesday, January 24, 2018
Ma Nature's about to give a reminder
of who really runs the planet.
I once read some idiot claim that 'man can do more damage to the environment than any natural event can!' I asked if that included, say, the Deccan Traps, or Toba; never got an answer.
I once read some idiot claim that 'man can do more damage to the environment than any natural event can!' I asked if that included, say, the Deccan Traps, or Toba; never got an answer.
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
Is there ANYONE at high level in the EffingBI who isn't a corrupt bastard?
Court documents recently filed by the government further rock the credibility of Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller because they show that as FBI Director Mueller he worked to cover up the connection between a Florida Saudi family and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The documents reveal that Mueller was likely involved in publicly releasing deceptive official agency statements about a secret investigation of the Saudis, who lived in Sarasota, with ties to the hijackers. A Florida journalism nonprofit uncovered the existence of the secret FBI investigation that was also kept from Congress.
Under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI tried to discredit the story, publicly countering that agents found no connection between the Sarasota Saudi family and the 2001 terrorist plot. The reality is that the FBI’s own files contained several reports that said the opposite, according to the Ft. Lauderdale-based news group’s ongoing investigation. Files obtained by reporters in the course of their lengthy probe reveal that federal agents found “many connections” between the family and “individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.” The FBI was forced to release the once-secret reports because the news group sued in federal court when the information wasn’t provided under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
This is the piece of shit the Democrats and never-Trumpers are so desperate to keep running the 'collusion with Russia' investigation.
I'll throw in: is there ANYONE running ANY federal agency(especially IRS, FBI, ATF, NSA, CIA) who can be trusted about ANYTHING?
Under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI tried to discredit the story, publicly countering that agents found no connection between the Sarasota Saudi family and the 2001 terrorist plot. The reality is that the FBI’s own files contained several reports that said the opposite, according to the Ft. Lauderdale-based news group’s ongoing investigation. Files obtained by reporters in the course of their lengthy probe reveal that federal agents found “many connections” between the family and “individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.” The FBI was forced to release the once-secret reports because the news group sued in federal court when the information wasn’t provided under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
This is the piece of shit the Democrats and never-Trumpers are so desperate to keep running the 'collusion with Russia' investigation.
I'll throw in: is there ANYONE running ANY federal agency(especially IRS, FBI, ATF, NSA, CIA) who can be trusted about ANYTHING?
Well, isn't she a wonderful little islamist?
A former St. Catherine University student charged with setting fires on
the college’s St. Paul campus told police she did it because she’d “been
reading about the U.S. military destroying schools in Iraq or
Afghanistan and she felt that she should do exactly the same thing,”
according to a criminal complaint filed Friday.
So the Democrats have come up with a lovely idea—sure, we’ll let you pay the troops. Just give us DACA. Or, to translate this so it’s unadorned—we’ll let you pay the people who protect America as long as you institute a key policy for destroying America. If the Democrats were laying siege to a castle—which in some ways is exactly what they’re doing, since they seek, essentially, to starve our military into submission— this would be something like saying “we’ll be happy to break our siege, as soon as you open the gates and let us in”.
Heard about this interview the other day, and if you want a fine example of why 'journalist' has become a cuss word, here it is. It's... amazing. The title is "Why Can't People Hear What Jordan Peterson Is Saying?", and the answer is 'Because the journalists don't like what he's saying, and lie about it.'
So the Democrats have come up with a lovely idea—sure, we’ll let you pay the troops. Just give us DACA. Or, to translate this so it’s unadorned—we’ll let you pay the people who protect America as long as you institute a key policy for destroying America. If the Democrats were laying siege to a castle—which in some ways is exactly what they’re doing, since they seek, essentially, to starve our military into submission— this would be something like saying “we’ll be happy to break our siege, as soon as you open the gates and let us in”.
Heard about this interview the other day, and if you want a fine example of why 'journalist' has become a cuss word, here it is. It's... amazing. The title is "Why Can't People Hear What Jordan Peterson Is Saying?", and the answer is 'Because the journalists don't like what he's saying, and lie about it.'
San Francisco PD: "We don't care about you, but
someone steals from Apple and all stops are off!"
Really, you morons? And if one of your idiots had killed one of the family, would we hear "I saw his hand move and felt we were in danger" or some other excuse?
Really, you morons? And if one of your idiots had killed one of the family, would we hear "I saw his hand move and felt we were in danger" or some other excuse?
Sunday, January 21, 2018
So now "Make those messages disappear before anyone sees them!" is now
'failed to preserve the messages'.
Is there anyone out there who still trusts the EffingBI about anything?
And if there is, what the hell is wrong with them?
Is there anyone out there who still trusts the EffingBI about anything?
And if there is, what the hell is wrong with them?
Saturday, January 20, 2018
I'd say the gator won
Late last week a group of golfers at Fiddler’s Creek Golf Club in
Naples, Florida came across just that. The group was on the tenth hole
when they spotted a large alligator munching on an equally large python
which was wrapped around it’s body.
If this information is correct, this asshat committed assault with a deadly weapon, at the least, I'd say. And I'd imagine there will be questions about investigating this.
Blood dancers gonna dance, any opportunity. Dirtbags.
If there's already this much evidence, it'll be interesting what else discovery finds. And Google deserves every bit of trouble they get over this crap.
If this information is correct, this asshat committed assault with a deadly weapon, at the least, I'd say. And I'd imagine there will be questions about investigating this.
Blood dancers gonna dance, any opportunity. Dirtbags.
If there's already this much evidence, it'll be interesting what else discovery finds. And Google deserves every bit of trouble they get over this crap.
Friday, January 19, 2018
Friday evening,
and it's not bad out there(at least this part of the country); so if you're out, enjoy it and take care of the data analysis later.
Thursday, January 18, 2018
Gee, I wonder why a party-line vote...
A review of a classified document outlining what is described as
extensive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse was made available
to all House members Thursday and the revelations could lead to the
removal of senior officials in the FBI and Department of Justice,
several sources with knowledge of the document stated. These sources say
the report is “explosive,” stating they would not be surprised if it
leads to the end of Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation into
President Trump and his associates.
The House Intelligence Committee passed the motion along party lines Thursday to make the classified report alleging extensive ‘FISA Abuse’ related to the controversial dossier available to all House members.
Why, you'd think there was something in it that one party didn't want people to know about.
The House Intelligence Committee passed the motion along party lines Thursday to make the classified report alleging extensive ‘FISA Abuse’ related to the controversial dossier available to all House members.
Why, you'd think there was something in it that one party didn't want people to know about.
"Hey, just because we're public servants doesn't mean
you get to see what we do! Even(especially) if we screwed up."
Also works out to "You can make us wear cameras, but you can't look at what they show us doing."
Also works out to "You can make us wear cameras, but you can't look at what they show us doing."
Speaking of stupid people in places of authority,
Biological women who legally define themselves as men will not be routinely scanned for breast and cervical cancer, even if they retain these organs and remain at risk, the National Health Service (NHS) has said.
However, at the same time, biological men who regard themselves as women are being invited for cervical smear tests – even though it is impossible for them to have a cervix – an official guidebook states.
"What the hell?" you might think.
So-called ‘trans health adviser’ Aedan Wolton featured in a related NHS Choices video and blog post, where he claimed that smear tests could be uncomfortable for “trans masculine people” who are biological women as it could offend how they perceive themselves.
He also claimed that words and references to the biological organs of men and women “can trigger feelings of gender dysphoria” in the transgendered.
Because 'sensitivity' and 'feels' are far more important than, say, protecting some people from disease and wasting time and money on useless tests for others.
However, at the same time, biological men who regard themselves as women are being invited for cervical smear tests – even though it is impossible for them to have a cervix – an official guidebook states.
"What the hell?" you might think.
So-called ‘trans health adviser’ Aedan Wolton featured in a related NHS Choices video and blog post, where he claimed that smear tests could be uncomfortable for “trans masculine people” who are biological women as it could offend how they perceive themselves.
He also claimed that words and references to the biological organs of men and women “can trigger feelings of gender dysphoria” in the transgendered.
Because 'sensitivity' and 'feels' are far more important than, say, protecting some people from disease and wasting time and money on useless tests for others.
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Kim has a piece on pocket pistols,
'Handy, but don't depend on them', but I think he missed one of their prime reasons for being: winter. A heavy coat can make it difficult to access your belt-carried sidearm, so something that'll fit in a pocket and is easy to reach and draw can be very handy. No, it won't be as powerful as, say, a M&P or a Sig P320, but it'll be enough to, at the least, buy you time.
Ok, so Sorbo wasn't even going to that Comicon
that he was banned from... Apparently the new virtue-signalling thing is banning people who don't know you and weren't coming. Because feels and stupid.
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Durbin's lied before about what was said in meetings, so
not only is there "Why believe him?", but anyone who'd trust him at a meeting is a fool.
Also: it's long beyond entertaining and well into "Fuck this and fuck you, asshole" territory to watch someone have a fit calling you a "Trumper!" when you point out that something is either flatly bullshit, or not to be trusted without some kind of proof.
So, the GAO did a study trying to illegally buy guns online; didn't work. So now the Democrats are whining that "You didn't do the study right!" Because it damages one of their favorite talking points. Get this from Schatz:
He continued, “Our view is that it is still absolutely possible to legally purchase guns online. The way that the GAO analysts did it is, they announced to the sellers, ‘Hey I’d like to buy some guns illegally.’ I think the sellers are wise enough to that to decline, so we did not agree with their methodology, but we’ll continue to work on this issue.”
Got that? Someone does what the Democrats have claimed is done, and couldn't buy a gun. So "You didn't do it right!"
And doing business legitimately doesn't count either:
TheDC asked Sen. Schatz if he took issue with these websites that operate legitimately and he stated he could not address the issue at that time.
Translation: "I hate them and want them out of business no matter what, but I can't say that outright."
Once again: The hell they 'don't want to take your guns'.
So: guy quite possibly lied on the forms(felony, let us remember), and then writes a story about GUN! And this is part of it:
You could almost say that a gun wants to be shot. I know that sounds like a magic busload of hippie nonsense, and I have no doubt that experienced gun collectors would scoff at the idea, but I swear I felt it. Not like it was calling out to me or anything, but as soon as it was in the room, it was the main thing about that room, a temperature raiser, an undeniable source of power.
Why yes, it IS hippie bullshit.
And don't worry, it gets worse.
Also: it's long beyond entertaining and well into "Fuck this and fuck you, asshole" territory to watch someone have a fit calling you a "Trumper!" when you point out that something is either flatly bullshit, or not to be trusted without some kind of proof.
So, the GAO did a study trying to illegally buy guns online; didn't work. So now the Democrats are whining that "You didn't do the study right!" Because it damages one of their favorite talking points. Get this from Schatz:
He continued, “Our view is that it is still absolutely possible to legally purchase guns online. The way that the GAO analysts did it is, they announced to the sellers, ‘Hey I’d like to buy some guns illegally.’ I think the sellers are wise enough to that to decline, so we did not agree with their methodology, but we’ll continue to work on this issue.”
Got that? Someone does what the Democrats have claimed is done, and couldn't buy a gun. So "You didn't do it right!"
And doing business legitimately doesn't count either:
TheDC asked Sen. Schatz if he took issue with these websites that operate legitimately and he stated he could not address the issue at that time.
Translation: "I hate them and want them out of business no matter what, but I can't say that outright."
Once again: The hell they 'don't want to take your guns'.
So: guy quite possibly lied on the forms(felony, let us remember), and then writes a story about GUN! And this is part of it:
You could almost say that a gun wants to be shot. I know that sounds like a magic busload of hippie nonsense, and I have no doubt that experienced gun collectors would scoff at the idea, but I swear I felt it. Not like it was calling out to me or anything, but as soon as it was in the room, it was the main thing about that room, a temperature raiser, an undeniable source of power.
Why yes, it IS hippie bullshit.
And don't worry, it gets worse.
Monday, January 15, 2018
On that lawsuit against Google:
There are expensive, time-consuming, exasperating lawsuits, and then there are radioactive lawsuits that poison everyone who comes within a mile of them. And this lawsuit almost certainly falls into the latter
category.
Personally, I certainly hope so.
The whole attitude behind 'zero-tolerance' crap:
“I asked: ‘In the time it would have taken him to go get a teacher, could that kid’s throat have been slit?’ She said yes, but that’s beside the point. That we ‘don’t condone heroics in this school.’ ”
Yeah. Better some kid wind up in the hospital or dead than your precious policy be violated.
" 'Due process'? How dare you violate our Narrative by calling for that!" More leftist autophagy.
Some words about third-world shitholes from someone who's been there.
Personally, I certainly hope so.
The whole attitude behind 'zero-tolerance' crap:
“I asked: ‘In the time it would have taken him to go get a teacher, could that kid’s throat have been slit?’ She said yes, but that’s beside the point. That we ‘don’t condone heroics in this school.’ ”
Yeah. Better some kid wind up in the hospital or dead than your precious policy be violated.
" 'Due process'? How dare you violate our Narrative by calling for that!" More leftist autophagy.
Some words about third-world shitholes from someone who's been there.
Sunday, January 14, 2018
The ghosts of Ruby Ridge and Waco are still around, and still causing problems.
For damned good reasons.
Not long ago I'd have said "Until the EffingBI and DoJ clean house and start firing and prosecuting personnel who lie and break laws and violate the public trust, this is only going to get worse." Problem is, the idiots in charge- and a bunch of their minions- basically considered such statements and said "Hold my daiquiri and watch this!"
So now we have another case of feds lying in sworn statements, hiding/screwing with evidence, and otherwise doing things that they put plain old citizens in jail for, and whining about being caught. And demanding respect when they've thrown away any reason they should be trusted. Yeah, I don't doubt there are honest FBI agents who don't abuse their authority, or break the law; there are DoJ lawyers who don't do those things either. Guess what?
It doesn't bloody matter. Because all the ones who DO do those things get away with it. Over and over. And completely screw- no, they take integrity and honor, wipe their ass with them, and flush them. And, knowing that, why should anyone trust ANY of them? Basic statement: "You may be one of the honest ones who don't do that crap. But since I don't know you, and don't know if that's true, then I'd be a fool to trust a word you say."
Comey and his fellow shitheads, and the corrupt bastards at DoJ, have trashed trust. And I really don't know if it'll be possible to rebuild it. Which is a really depressing thought.
Not long ago I'd have said "Until the EffingBI and DoJ clean house and start firing and prosecuting personnel who lie and break laws and violate the public trust, this is only going to get worse." Problem is, the idiots in charge- and a bunch of their minions- basically considered such statements and said "Hold my daiquiri and watch this!"
So now we have another case of feds lying in sworn statements, hiding/screwing with evidence, and otherwise doing things that they put plain old citizens in jail for, and whining about being caught. And demanding respect when they've thrown away any reason they should be trusted. Yeah, I don't doubt there are honest FBI agents who don't abuse their authority, or break the law; there are DoJ lawyers who don't do those things either. Guess what?
It doesn't bloody matter. Because all the ones who DO do those things get away with it. Over and over. And completely screw- no, they take integrity and honor, wipe their ass with them, and flush them. And, knowing that, why should anyone trust ANY of them? Basic statement: "You may be one of the honest ones who don't do that crap. But since I don't know you, and don't know if that's true, then I'd be a fool to trust a word you say."
Comey and his fellow shitheads, and the corrupt bastards at DoJ, have trashed trust. And I really don't know if it'll be possible to rebuild it. Which is a really depressing thought.
"We don't want THOSE people here, they have badthink virus!"
East Coast Comicon promoter Cliff Galbraith bragged on Facebook about turning Kevin Sorbo away from Comicon in New Jersey this year based on Sorbo's relationship with conservative talk show host Sean Hannity.
Such wonderful people, aren't they?
Or, as Mike Williamson has put it, "Remember when the left cared about free speech? Me neither."
Because 'Diversity above all else!' Except when someone doesn't have the proper 'progressive' attitudes, THEN diversity is bad...
A former dean is suing the University of Missouri School of Medicine for wrongful termination, alleging that she was fired because of her race and skepticism of certain diversity initiatives.
Such wonderful people, aren't they?
Or, as Mike Williamson has put it, "Remember when the left cared about free speech? Me neither."
Because 'Diversity above all else!' Except when someone doesn't have the proper 'progressive' attitudes, THEN diversity is bad...
A former dean is suing the University of Missouri School of Medicine for wrongful termination, alleging that she was fired because of her race and skepticism of certain diversity initiatives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)