Showing posts with label Corrupt judges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corrupt judges. Show all posts
Saturday, April 18, 2026
Friday, April 17, 2026
Politicians and media ass-kissers and judges, oh my
And no, I'm not leaving the Stupid Party out, just haven't seen one on their idiots this morning.
Friday, July 18, 2025
"I had PTSD because those people blamed us! If Trump hadn't stood up
with his fist in the air they'd have killed us journalists!"
And the downside?
And the downside?
The NYC Mayor communist candidate(who says he isn't) says he'd be in favor of the 'abolition of private property.'
That slight rumbling the northeastern US can feel is people starting to pack to get the hell out of New York.
"You have to go to college!" they cry. Except
“In Aspen, I sat and listened to Larry Fink say we need 500,000 electricians in the next couple of years—not hyperbole.”
“The BlueForge Alliance, who oversees our maritime industrial base—that’s 15,000 individual companies who are collectively charged with building and delivering nuclear-powered subs to the Navy … calls and says, we’re having a hell of a time finding tradespeople. Can you help?”
“I said, I don’t know, man … how many do you need? He says, 140,000.”
...
“The automotive industry needs 80,000 collision repair and technicians.”
“Energy, I don’t even know what the number is, I hear 300,000, I hear 500,000.”
“There is a clear and present freakout going on right now. I’ve heard from six governors in the last six months. I’ve heard from the heads of major companies.”
Sounds like a lot of jobs that don't require you to go into debt to a college.
But you must trust the courts! They say so!
Federal judge James Boasberg advised Chief Justice John Roberts and some two dozen other judges that his D.C. colleagues were “concern[ed] that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis,” according to a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist. That Judge Boasberg and his fellow D.C. District Court judges would discuss how a named Defendant in numerous pending lawsuits might respond to an adverse ruling is shocking. Equally outrageous is those judges’ clear disregard for the presumption of regularity — a presumption that requires a court to presume public officials properly discharged their official duties.
...
Donald Trump, however, is not merely the president: He is a Defendant in scores of lawsuits, including multiple cases in the D.C. District Court. As such, this conversation did not concern generic concerns of the judiciary, but specific discussions about a litigant currently before the same judges who expressed concern to the Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court that the Trump Administration would disregard the court’s orders.
Judge Boasberg’s comments reveal he and his colleagues hold an anti-Trump bias, for the Trump Administration had complied with every court order to date (and since for that matter). The D.C. District Court judges’ “concern” also went counter to the normal presumption courts hold — one that presumes public officials properly discharged their official duties. Apparently, that presumption does not apply to the current president, at least if you are litigating in D.C.
And what is both troubling and ironic is that only a few days later, Judge Boasberg, in a case in which he completely lacked jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court would later confirm, entered a lawless order commanding the Trump Administration to halt removals to El Salvador. So, one of the judges concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law. Nonetheless, Judge Boasberg would later find “the Trump Administration committed criminal contempt of court” by failing to turn the planes around or fly the gang members back to the U.S., even though the court’s written (and unlawful) injunction ordered neither.
Sounds to me like the Chief Justice needs to have some words with some judges. Or else, sooner or later, face up to actions to get rid of some of those judges, the idea of which seems to horrify him so.
That slight rumbling the northeastern US can feel is people starting to pack to get the hell out of New York.
"You have to go to college!" they cry. Except
“In Aspen, I sat and listened to Larry Fink say we need 500,000 electricians in the next couple of years—not hyperbole.”
“The BlueForge Alliance, who oversees our maritime industrial base—that’s 15,000 individual companies who are collectively charged with building and delivering nuclear-powered subs to the Navy … calls and says, we’re having a hell of a time finding tradespeople. Can you help?”
“I said, I don’t know, man … how many do you need? He says, 140,000.”
...
“The automotive industry needs 80,000 collision repair and technicians.”
“Energy, I don’t even know what the number is, I hear 300,000, I hear 500,000.”
“There is a clear and present freakout going on right now. I’ve heard from six governors in the last six months. I’ve heard from the heads of major companies.”
Sounds like a lot of jobs that don't require you to go into debt to a college.
But you must trust the courts! They say so!
Federal judge James Boasberg advised Chief Justice John Roberts and some two dozen other judges that his D.C. colleagues were “concern[ed] that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis,” according to a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist. That Judge Boasberg and his fellow D.C. District Court judges would discuss how a named Defendant in numerous pending lawsuits might respond to an adverse ruling is shocking. Equally outrageous is those judges’ clear disregard for the presumption of regularity — a presumption that requires a court to presume public officials properly discharged their official duties.
...
Donald Trump, however, is not merely the president: He is a Defendant in scores of lawsuits, including multiple cases in the D.C. District Court. As such, this conversation did not concern generic concerns of the judiciary, but specific discussions about a litigant currently before the same judges who expressed concern to the Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court that the Trump Administration would disregard the court’s orders.
Judge Boasberg’s comments reveal he and his colleagues hold an anti-Trump bias, for the Trump Administration had complied with every court order to date (and since for that matter). The D.C. District Court judges’ “concern” also went counter to the normal presumption courts hold — one that presumes public officials properly discharged their official duties. Apparently, that presumption does not apply to the current president, at least if you are litigating in D.C.
And what is both troubling and ironic is that only a few days later, Judge Boasberg, in a case in which he completely lacked jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court would later confirm, entered a lawless order commanding the Trump Administration to halt removals to El Salvador. So, one of the judges concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law. Nonetheless, Judge Boasberg would later find “the Trump Administration committed criminal contempt of court” by failing to turn the planes around or fly the gang members back to the U.S., even though the court’s written (and unlawful) injunction ordered neither.
Sounds to me like the Chief Justice needs to have some words with some judges. Or else, sooner or later, face up to actions to get rid of some of those judges, the idea of which seems to horrify him so.
Wednesday, February 12, 2025
A collection, which includes some people who really ought to be facing a public whipping post
Let's start with a Democrat party official calling for a death penalty for supporting Trump, and saying
...President Trump’s efforts “would be sufficient morally to support his extraconstitutional removal.”
My, I wonder who he wants running the executions squads? Will be be official and call for the EffingBI, or just be honest and call for antifa murder squads?
And who will be his Che to make sure there are no findings of 'innocent'?
And just how many people he's willing to lose to murder all those people? Because a lot of people will be rather resistant, I would think, to being executed by the Stalin wannabes.
One more reason to fire most, if not all, of the EffingBI:
There was a very disturbing article in the Los Angeles Times, warning criminal aliens of a pending ICE operation sweep that was coming to the LA area. The source for the advanced tip-off were indicated within the reporting to be FBI officials in Washington DC.
Today, it appears that Dept of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is confirming the leak came from the FBI as she says, “The FBI is so corrupt. We will work with any and every agency to stop leaks and prosecute these crooked deep state agents to the fullest extent of the law.”
No excuses, fire and try them.
Speaking of, you've got a judge who said "The Treasury Secretary doesn't get to know much about his position", and others pulling other bullshit. Including some leftist judges telling the President "You do what I say and put back all that funding you've stopped!" And others who've pulled out some first class bullshit.
Guy whose blog I used to read once said "Take an incompetent or bigoted lawyer and put him in a black robe, that does not suddenly make them a superior lawyer." Boy, was he right.
The Brits seem to have judges like the Germans: easy punishments for muslim immigrants, and screw the victims. Again.
A Pakistani father who was jailed for child sex offences escaped deportation because it would be “unduly harsh” on his children.
The unnamed father of two toddlers, who was granted anonymity by an immigration court, had been banned from living with his children since he was convicted of trying to get three “barely pubescent” girls to engage in sex and jailed for 18 months.
The Brits need to remember just what Gen. Napier said, and what he would've said about this.
This lady's been putting out a lot of stuff confirming just what a bleeping mess the White House was after the Democrats and their servile 'lie on the news' clowns could no longer pretend Biden was going down hill fast(er) every day, and this part includes
"It was for sure Obama’s third term," Lindy Li said. "I don’t think that’s even a question."
"That’s why you saw Obama fighting for his dear life in the fall," she said. "Because he was fighting for his fourth term. He was fighting for his own legacy."
Which brought to mind if it was Hunter making up the "Pardon Me!" list. Because if it were confirmed he usurped Biden's authority, and sat illegally in classified meetings, I think that would get him in some serious trouble.
...President Trump’s efforts “would be sufficient morally to support his extraconstitutional removal.”
My, I wonder who he wants running the executions squads? Will be be official and call for the EffingBI, or just be honest and call for antifa murder squads?
And who will be his Che to make sure there are no findings of 'innocent'?
And just how many people he's willing to lose to murder all those people? Because a lot of people will be rather resistant, I would think, to being executed by the Stalin wannabes.
One more reason to fire most, if not all, of the EffingBI:
There was a very disturbing article in the Los Angeles Times, warning criminal aliens of a pending ICE operation sweep that was coming to the LA area. The source for the advanced tip-off were indicated within the reporting to be FBI officials in Washington DC.
Today, it appears that Dept of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is confirming the leak came from the FBI as she says, “The FBI is so corrupt. We will work with any and every agency to stop leaks and prosecute these crooked deep state agents to the fullest extent of the law.”
No excuses, fire and try them.
Speaking of, you've got a judge who said "The Treasury Secretary doesn't get to know much about his position", and others pulling other bullshit. Including some leftist judges telling the President "You do what I say and put back all that funding you've stopped!" And others who've pulled out some first class bullshit.
Guy whose blog I used to read once said "Take an incompetent or bigoted lawyer and put him in a black robe, that does not suddenly make them a superior lawyer." Boy, was he right.
The Brits seem to have judges like the Germans: easy punishments for muslim immigrants, and screw the victims. Again.
A Pakistani father who was jailed for child sex offences escaped deportation because it would be “unduly harsh” on his children.
The unnamed father of two toddlers, who was granted anonymity by an immigration court, had been banned from living with his children since he was convicted of trying to get three “barely pubescent” girls to engage in sex and jailed for 18 months.
The Brits need to remember just what Gen. Napier said, and what he would've said about this.
This lady's been putting out a lot of stuff confirming just what a bleeping mess the White House was after the Democrats and their servile 'lie on the news' clowns could no longer pretend Biden was going down hill fast(er) every day, and this part includes
"It was for sure Obama’s third term," Lindy Li said. "I don’t think that’s even a question."
"That’s why you saw Obama fighting for his dear life in the fall," she said. "Because he was fighting for his fourth term. He was fighting for his own legacy."
Which brought to mind if it was Hunter making up the "Pardon Me!" list. Because if it were confirmed he usurped Biden's authority, and sat illegally in classified meetings, I think that would get him in some serious trouble.
Saturday, September 07, 2024
Can you say 'Corruption', boys and girls?
I knew you could.
Today I filed a new judicial ethics complaint with the New York State Commission because new evidence on Kamala Harris’ most recent FEC filing shows she hired and paid Acting Justice Juan Merchan’s adult daughter’s company. This is a clear violation of the New York State Judicial Code of Conduct which dictates that a judge must recuse from a case where a relative up to and including the sixth degree has a financial interest in the outcome of the case. Read my full complaint below:
Bold mine. Here's the link, which has the full complaint.
Today I filed a new judicial ethics complaint with the New York State Commission because new evidence on Kamala Harris’ most recent FEC filing shows she hired and paid Acting Justice Juan Merchan’s adult daughter’s company. This is a clear violation of the New York State Judicial Code of Conduct which dictates that a judge must recuse from a case where a relative up to and including the sixth degree has a financial interest in the outcome of the case. Read my full complaint below:
Bold mine. Here's the link, which has the full complaint.
Friday, September 06, 2024
Speaking of people telling the truth,
in this case because 'showing off to hot girl',
Crowder posted thirteen minutes of Biase talking with his date on social media Thursday. Bragg, according to Biase, was “just stacking charges and rearranging things just to make it fit a case.” Biase also says, at various points in the video, what he thinks of the case against Trump: “Honestly, I think the case is nonsense.” “It’s a perversion of justice.” “It’s a travesty of justice.” “It’s a mockery of justice.” As if that weren’t enough, he adds that “the whole thing is disgusting,” and observes, “That’s why he [Trump] is surging in the polls.”
...
Biase even went so far as to criticize another politically motivated Trump persecutor, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan, for the likelihood that he will imprison Trump in a couple of weeks over his own flimsy case. “This guy is probably going to try to lock him up,” Biase said. “And there is going to be, it’s going to be ugly… They are so obsessed with getting him.”
When his date asked him who was so obsessed with getting Trump, he answered, “The Democrats … It affects his candidacy if he’s a convicted felon.” Biase didn’t think this would work: “Those felonies did nothing to stop Trump from running … In fact, they made him more relevant.”
Crowder posted thirteen minutes of Biase talking with his date on social media Thursday. Bragg, according to Biase, was “just stacking charges and rearranging things just to make it fit a case.” Biase also says, at various points in the video, what he thinks of the case against Trump: “Honestly, I think the case is nonsense.” “It’s a perversion of justice.” “It’s a travesty of justice.” “It’s a mockery of justice.” As if that weren’t enough, he adds that “the whole thing is disgusting,” and observes, “That’s why he [Trump] is surging in the polls.”
...
Biase even went so far as to criticize another politically motivated Trump persecutor, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan, for the likelihood that he will imprison Trump in a couple of weeks over his own flimsy case. “This guy is probably going to try to lock him up,” Biase said. “And there is going to be, it’s going to be ugly… They are so obsessed with getting him.”
When his date asked him who was so obsessed with getting Trump, he answered, “The Democrats … It affects his candidacy if he’s a convicted felon.” Biase didn’t think this would work: “Those felonies did nothing to stop Trump from running … In fact, they made him more relevant.”
Wednesday, August 14, 2024
Our 'elites' want to follow the same path to hell Britain is
Exhibit A:An immigrant who raped a 13-year-old girl in the UK was allowed to walk free because he didn't know rape was illegal.
But posting your opinion on social media leads to years in prison.
Exhibit B: A Haitian migrant charged with the rape of a 15-year-old girl at a Massachusetts hotel was released on $500 bail last week despite ongoing requests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to transfer him to its custody.
This is going to take a lot of lamppost and cordage.
But posting your opinion on social media leads to years in prison.
Exhibit B: A Haitian migrant charged with the rape of a 15-year-old girl at a Massachusetts hotel was released on $500 bail last week despite ongoing requests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to transfer him to its custody.
This is going to take a lot of lamppost and cordage.
Friday, May 31, 2024
I might as well get this on the verdict out of the way, from a law professor,
and he's not the only one:
"I think, as I said before, that this case was legally unfounded. When they were reading those guilty verdicts, the one thing that we didn't know is really what he was found guilty of. Because if you remember, the judge allowed the jury to find guilt on any one of the three secondary crimes," Turley said. That meant the jury didn't have to determine exactly what crime was committed.
"We weren't told whether the jury found any one of those crimes, whether they found all three of those crimes. I'm not too sure we will know that. That's one of the many issues that I think presents reversible problems in this case," Turley assessed. (bold mine)
Which is a polite way of saying "This is such bullshit, it's amazing."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2024/05/30/jonathan-turley-reaction-trump-verdict-n2639762
"I think, as I said before, that this case was legally unfounded. When they were reading those guilty verdicts, the one thing that we didn't know is really what he was found guilty of. Because if you remember, the judge allowed the jury to find guilt on any one of the three secondary crimes," Turley said. That meant the jury didn't have to determine exactly what crime was committed.
"We weren't told whether the jury found any one of those crimes, whether they found all three of those crimes. I'm not too sure we will know that. That's one of the many issues that I think presents reversible problems in this case," Turley assessed. (bold mine)
Which is a polite way of saying "This is such bullshit, it's amazing."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2024/05/30/jonathan-turley-reaction-trump-verdict-n2639762
Thursday, May 30, 2024
Yes, the left got what it wanted,
convictions for Trump. That are sure to be reversed, when the crap the prosecutors and judge pulled are appealed. But they don't care.
They also don't care about the damage they did to the justice system, particularly in New effing York.
As someone said a few years ago, they'll start caring when someone uses their new rules against them. But it'll be too late then.
They also don't care about the damage they did to the justice system, particularly in New effing York.
As someone said a few years ago, they'll start caring when someone uses their new rules against them. But it'll be too late then.
Tuesday, May 21, 2024
A collection
Another failure of the victim selection process.
You may cheer and applaud.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/20/woman-fatally-shoots-attacker-california/
The judge in the NY Trump case... if there's not complaints to take that black robe away, I'll be amazed.
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/05/21/are-you-staring-me-down-judge-merchan-becomes-an-oddity-in-his-own-courtroom/
You may cheer and applaud.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/20/woman-fatally-shoots-attacker-california/
The judge in the NY Trump case... if there's not complaints to take that black robe away, I'll be amazed.
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/05/21/are-you-staring-me-down-judge-merchan-becomes-an-oddity-in-his-own-courtroom/
They aren't even pretending this raid on the reserves isn't to buy votes
https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/21/biden-oil-reserve-gas-prices-2024-election/
Some of the tyrant wannabes have been getting serious pushback
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/05/03/the-toppling-of-the-woke-authoritarians/
Pushback to ATF's latest "Who needs Congress to make law?"
https://www.dailywire.com/news/federal-judge-blocks-biden-gun-background-check-rule-for-texas-gun-rights-groups
And how I've got other stuff to do.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/21/biden-oil-reserve-gas-prices-2024-election/
Some of the tyrant wannabes have been getting serious pushback
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/05/03/the-toppling-of-the-woke-authoritarians/
Pushback to ATF's latest "Who needs Congress to make law?"
https://www.dailywire.com/news/federal-judge-blocks-biden-gun-background-check-rule-for-texas-gun-rights-groups
And how I've got other stuff to do.
Thursday, May 09, 2024
Couple of bits of news
First, Why Is the Judge in Trump's New York Trial Muzzling a Key Defense Witness?
A: He's corrupt.
B: He can.
C: Oh yes, there should be real consequences for this garbage. Judge and prosecutor both. You don't have to care for Trump to want this kind of crap be stopped in the courtroom.
I've written before about the WHO "Let us take control at the first opportunity" 'treaty', here's more.
And something about it from Dr. Jay Battacharya, one of the people Fauci & Co. tried to destroy for writing the Great Barrington Declaration.
Short version: anyone in Congress who supports this 'treaty' has given another reason to remove them from office.
A: He's corrupt.
B: He can.
C: Oh yes, there should be real consequences for this garbage. Judge and prosecutor both. You don't have to care for Trump to want this kind of crap be stopped in the courtroom.
I've written before about the WHO "Let us take control at the first opportunity" 'treaty', here's more.
And something about it from Dr. Jay Battacharya, one of the people Fauci & Co. tried to destroy for writing the Great Barrington Declaration.
Short version: anyone in Congress who supports this 'treaty' has given another reason to remove them from office.
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Thursday, March 21, 2024
"I'm not supposed to know all this, I'm a diversity appointment!"
“So you submitted a brief, an appellate brief, you signed it, and you don’t know and… you said abolish 'assault weapons,' and you don’t know what you wanted them to abolish?”
Of course not, it's just the buzz phrase she's been taught to parrot.
Of course not, it's just the buzz phrase she's been taught to parrot.
Wednesday, March 20, 2024
Tuesday, January 17, 2023
Seems some judges in Canuckistan are good with just killing people instead of
giving them the option of suicide.
Amanda Rojas-Silva, 42, and Shane Hutley, 35, had been charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence in Warriner’s death — charges they denied, saying they used only the force necessary to gain a hold of her.
Now, those charges have been dropped after a judge concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to take the case to trial — a decision CBC News has learned the Crown won’t appeal.
That’s despite the available video footage, two security staff who testified the accused placed weight on her upper body while she was held chest down, a forensic pathologist who testified Warriner would still be alive had she not been restrained that day — and revelations one of the guards admitted he falsely claimed Warriner threw the first punch.
I suspect 'the Crown won't appeal' boils down to "Oh, good, we can make this go away!"
These guards AND that judge deserve to be in cells. And the other Crown officials need to be fired. At the least.
Amanda Rojas-Silva, 42, and Shane Hutley, 35, had been charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence in Warriner’s death — charges they denied, saying they used only the force necessary to gain a hold of her.
Now, those charges have been dropped after a judge concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to take the case to trial — a decision CBC News has learned the Crown won’t appeal.
That’s despite the available video footage, two security staff who testified the accused placed weight on her upper body while she was held chest down, a forensic pathologist who testified Warriner would still be alive had she not been restrained that day — and revelations one of the guards admitted he falsely claimed Warriner threw the first punch.
I suspect 'the Crown won't appeal' boils down to "Oh, good, we can make this go away!"
These guards AND that judge deserve to be in cells. And the other Crown officials need to be fired. At the least.
Thursday, September 16, 2021
Thursday, December 17, 2020
'principled decision' my ass: Roberts and six of the other Supremes are chickenshit and cowards,
and God knows what price we'll pay for it.
I wonder if this is part of whatever blackmail/payoff someone has on Roberts, or if he's just this sorry a bastard?
Found at Miguel's place
Wednesday, June 24, 2020
I'll take "Politicians and Black-Robed Idiots who need to be decorating trees"
for a thousand, Alex.
...That bill includes a clause written by Martha Walters, the chief justice of Oregon’s Supreme Court, at the request of Brown. This clause will allow Walters to suspend due process for up to sixty days if she deems it necessary during the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fuck the both of you assholes, with an old, splintery shovel handle. Your 'order' doesn't supersede the Constitution no matter how much you want that power. And the fact that said idiot in a black robe thinks she can is reason enough for said idiot to decorate a tree or lamppost. And the other idiot, who sits in the Governor's office, should be right next to her.
...That bill includes a clause written by Martha Walters, the chief justice of Oregon’s Supreme Court, at the request of Brown. This clause will allow Walters to suspend due process for up to sixty days if she deems it necessary during the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fuck the both of you assholes, with an old, splintery shovel handle. Your 'order' doesn't supersede the Constitution no matter how much you want that power. And the fact that said idiot in a black robe thinks she can is reason enough for said idiot to decorate a tree or lamppost. And the other idiot, who sits in the Governor's office, should be right next to her.
Monday, May 25, 2020
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
More "Why don't people trust the .gov? Because the swamp creatures
take care of their own."
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has triggered a wave of condemnations over the selection of David Kris, to oversee reforms of the FBI FISA process. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) presiding Judge James Boasberg, left, appointed Kris, a lawyer that the Washington Post describes as “highly controversial.
...
...The more serious allegations however is that Kris was one of the most public advocates for rejecting allegations of FBI abuse. In a city where you can throw a stick and hit ten lawyers, FISC went to someone who insisted that allegations of abuse were nonsense and should be rejected. If the court was seeking to assure the public, it has added a new controversy for those who see a “deep state” response to reforms.
He's a lousy choice to try to fix the mess, but he's a great choice to pretend to do so.
I repeat: and these clowns expect us to trust them? About anything?
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has triggered a wave of condemnations over the selection of David Kris, to oversee reforms of the FBI FISA process. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) presiding Judge James Boasberg, left, appointed Kris, a lawyer that the Washington Post describes as “highly controversial.
...
...The more serious allegations however is that Kris was one of the most public advocates for rejecting allegations of FBI abuse. In a city where you can throw a stick and hit ten lawyers, FISC went to someone who insisted that allegations of abuse were nonsense and should be rejected. If the court was seeking to assure the public, it has added a new controversy for those who see a “deep state” response to reforms.
He's a lousy choice to try to fix the mess, but he's a great choice to pretend to do so.
I repeat: and these clowns expect us to trust them? About anything?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)