Friday, May 31, 2013

Is there ANY part of the Constitution this administration will actually stand behind?

Sure doesn't seem like it.
In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S. the Obama Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights.
Same kind of garbage Mark Steyn fought in Canada, and that's strangling (fG)Britain.

Screw that, and screw you, Killian.
Evidently that was a precursor of sorts for an upcoming Tennessee event (“Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society”) that will feature the region’s top DOJ official, who serves as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, and an FBI representative. The goal is to increase awareness and understanding that American Muslims are not the terrorists some have made them out to be in social media and other circles, according to a local newspaper report. The June 4 powwow is sponsored by the American Muslim Advisory Council of Tennessee.
Miserable suckass PC-at-any-cost fools.

And let's not forget this crap from last year*:
President Barack Obama’s top civil rights official repeatedly declined to support religious free speech during a July 27 congressional hearing, despite repeated questioning from Arizona Republican Rep. Trent Franks, who chairs the House’s constitution subcommittee.

Tom Perez, the progressive who runs the Justice Department’s civil rights office, refused to answer the questions posed by Franks.

“Will you tell us… that this administration’s Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion?” Frank asked four times.

Perez refused to answer, saying “it is a hard question, in the sense that when you make threats against someone.” Perez then suggested he would respond to draft legislation from the committee, but again refused to answer Frank’s question about free speech rights.
Besides the 'Screw free speech' attitude, notice the misleading 'when you make threats' garbage; NOBODY mentioned threats, just speech.
Of course, to socialist assholes like this any speech they don't approve of is a threat.

1 comment:

Windy Wilson said...

As for religious speech, if I sat through 10 years of Jeremiah Wright preaching sermons I didn't hear, words that no one except the evil right-winger totalitarians heard, I'd be against religious speech, too.

And how about that! This is so appropriate; The WV is represented cmcommi, and for a fact, this administration does represent Chicago Machine Commies.