Thursday, January 16, 2020
This. Is. CNN.
In a time when violent anti-Semitism is on the rise, CNN has refused an interview with Vice President Mike Pence in Jerusalem to mark the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz — because the network is “all impeachment, all of the time,” according to sources.
...
A CNN source said: “Wolf really wanted to do the Pence interview personally. He cares deeply because of his family background, which is why Wolf was offered it by the White House. But Zucker stepped in and said Wolf isn’t going anywhere because the network will be ‘all impeachment, all of the time’ next week. CNN’s anti-Trump bias is so intense, they can’t even broadcast a sympathetic interview for Holocaust remembrance.” Dozens of world leaders are expected at the forum, including Vladimir Putin and Emmanuel Macron.
...
A CNN source said: “Wolf really wanted to do the Pence interview personally. He cares deeply because of his family background, which is why Wolf was offered it by the White House. But Zucker stepped in and said Wolf isn’t going anywhere because the network will be ‘all impeachment, all of the time’ next week. CNN’s anti-Trump bias is so intense, they can’t even broadcast a sympathetic interview for Holocaust remembrance.” Dozens of world leaders are expected at the forum, including Vladimir Putin and Emmanuel Macron.
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
In Virginia, it's a start
Even in the face of that kind of popular discontent, four measures
moved forward in the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee, thanks to a
Democratic majority, though some were in slightly weakened form, The
Free Beacon reported.
But one bill, known as SB 16, a controversial measure that would have “effectively” allowed authorities to confiscate weapons that violate it, was withdrawn entirely, The Free Beacon reported.
But one bill, known as SB 16, a controversial measure that would have “effectively” allowed authorities to confiscate weapons that violate it, was withdrawn entirely, The Free Beacon reported.
The domestic terrorism a lot of the left doesn't like to talk about,
and some make excuses for. Because the terrorists don't fit the Preferred Narrative™.
The U.S. attorney in New Jersey and the head of the local FBI said Monday that the bomb found in the van of alleged domestic terrorists Francine Graham and David Anderson could have killed or maimed people up to five football fields away.
They also said there was enough material in the van to make a second bomb.
They attempted mass murder, were planning further attacks, yet a bunch of idiots, including NAACP officials, made excuses for them and blamed the Jews for it.
Something flat horrible and huge is going to happen, and these idiots won't blame the people responsible, they'll blame White Supremacy and Jews.
The U.S. attorney in New Jersey and the head of the local FBI said Monday that the bomb found in the van of alleged domestic terrorists Francine Graham and David Anderson could have killed or maimed people up to five football fields away.
They also said there was enough material in the van to make a second bomb.
They attempted mass murder, were planning further attacks, yet a bunch of idiots, including NAACP officials, made excuses for them and blamed the Jews for it.
Something flat horrible and huge is going to happen, and these idiots won't blame the people responsible, they'll blame White Supremacy and Jews.
Civil rights win in Florida,
Florida Carry, Inc. has emerged victorious in their lawsuit against Broward County and County Administrator Bertha Henry in
which they sought a permanent injunction to protect the rights of law
abiding gun owners from the county's multiple illegal ordinances that
burden nearly all aspects of firearms ownership, use, transfer, and
possession.
"Broward County has ignored repeated attempts since 2011 by Florida Carry to gain its compliance with state law and left us with no choice but to file this case," said Florida Carry Executive Director Sean Caranna. "Let this case serve as proof that when local officials refuse to stop breaking the law in order to deny the rights of Floridians, Florida Carry will act to demand that people's rights be protected."
"Broward County has ignored repeated attempts since 2011 by Florida Carry to gain its compliance with state law and left us with no choice but to file this case," said Florida Carry Executive Director Sean Caranna. "Let this case serve as proof that when local officials refuse to stop breaking the law in order to deny the rights of Floridians, Florida Carry will act to demand that people's rights be protected."
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
Meanwhile, in the place where Great Britain used to be,
An Asian grooming gang was free to roam the streets and abuse young girls because police officers were told to “find other ethnicities” to investigate, a detective has claimed.
At least 57 young girls are thought to have been exploited by a paedophile network of around 100 suspected perpetrators based in south Manchester in the 2000s. The gang, mainly comprised of Asian men, hooked their victims on drugs, groomed, and sexually abused them. One girl, aged 15, died after being injected with heroin by a 50-year-old man.
Following a two-year inquiry, commissioned by Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, into the historic failings of police and social workers, a report was published today which concluded that vulnerable girls in care were groomed and abused in "plain sight".
This is what happens when "PC At Any Cost" is the working mindset of your government.
At least 57 young girls are thought to have been exploited by a paedophile network of around 100 suspected perpetrators based in south Manchester in the 2000s. The gang, mainly comprised of Asian men, hooked their victims on drugs, groomed, and sexually abused them. One girl, aged 15, died after being injected with heroin by a 50-year-old man.
Following a two-year inquiry, commissioned by Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, into the historic failings of police and social workers, a report was published today which concluded that vulnerable girls in care were groomed and abused in "plain sight".
This is what happens when "PC At Any Cost" is the working mindset of your government.
More "Why don't people trust the .gov? Because the swamp creatures
take care of their own."
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has triggered a wave of condemnations over the selection of David Kris, to oversee reforms of the FBI FISA process. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) presiding Judge James Boasberg, left, appointed Kris, a lawyer that the Washington Post describes as “highly controversial.
...
...The more serious allegations however is that Kris was one of the most public advocates for rejecting allegations of FBI abuse. In a city where you can throw a stick and hit ten lawyers, FISC went to someone who insisted that allegations of abuse were nonsense and should be rejected. If the court was seeking to assure the public, it has added a new controversy for those who see a “deep state” response to reforms.
He's a lousy choice to try to fix the mess, but he's a great choice to pretend to do so.
I repeat: and these clowns expect us to trust them? About anything?
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has triggered a wave of condemnations over the selection of David Kris, to oversee reforms of the FBI FISA process. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) presiding Judge James Boasberg, left, appointed Kris, a lawyer that the Washington Post describes as “highly controversial.
...
...The more serious allegations however is that Kris was one of the most public advocates for rejecting allegations of FBI abuse. In a city where you can throw a stick and hit ten lawyers, FISC went to someone who insisted that allegations of abuse were nonsense and should be rejected. If the court was seeking to assure the public, it has added a new controversy for those who see a “deep state” response to reforms.
He's a lousy choice to try to fix the mess, but he's a great choice to pretend to do so.
I repeat: and these clowns expect us to trust them? About anything?
"But- Globular Climate Change! Dead bears!"
Nazzo fast, Guido.
This aerial shot of six fat polar bears lolling around on a sand beach on the coast of the Southern Beaufort Sea, Alaska, was taken by NOAA employees in July 2019. It exemplifies the reality that bears in this subpopulation are currently abundant and healthy, negating the suggestion that numbers have continued to drop since 2006 because bears are starving.
The above picture of polar bear health is not an exception but the rule for all 31 bears recorded onshore last July, as the photos below from other locations testify. Those who would blame this abundance of bears on lack of sea ice in 2019 should note that ice retreated as early and as extensively in 2017 yet only 3 bears were spotted onshore. Results of a recent (2017-2018) population survey, which have not yet been made public, will of course not reflect conditions seen in 2019.
And, last I saw, the overall population is doing quite well.
On the "Without ice they'll STARVE!" that's been pushed(as if all the ice were gone forever), I have to wonder: Let's say the climate went through the equivalent of the Medieval Warm Period for a couple of centuries. The polar bears survived it before, do these people actually think they couldn't survive it again?
This aerial shot of six fat polar bears lolling around on a sand beach on the coast of the Southern Beaufort Sea, Alaska, was taken by NOAA employees in July 2019. It exemplifies the reality that bears in this subpopulation are currently abundant and healthy, negating the suggestion that numbers have continued to drop since 2006 because bears are starving.
The above picture of polar bear health is not an exception but the rule for all 31 bears recorded onshore last July, as the photos below from other locations testify. Those who would blame this abundance of bears on lack of sea ice in 2019 should note that ice retreated as early and as extensively in 2017 yet only 3 bears were spotted onshore. Results of a recent (2017-2018) population survey, which have not yet been made public, will of course not reflect conditions seen in 2019.
And, last I saw, the overall population is doing quite well.
On the "Without ice they'll STARVE!" that's been pushed(as if all the ice were gone forever), I have to wonder: Let's say the climate went through the equivalent of the Medieval Warm Period for a couple of centuries. The polar bears survived it before, do these people actually think they couldn't survive it again?
Monday, January 13, 2020
Some penetration tests on .45acp, 9mm, 12 gauge,
.223 and .300 Blackout. A lot of "We used THIS gun with THESE features" and ads, but some interesting results.
Well, this is bullshit
Today, we became aware that on or about January 9, 2020, a letter sent out by the Pennsylvania State Police (“PSP”) to Federal Firearms Licensees (“FFLs”) that pursuant to what it refers to as “the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s binding opinion”, the PSP has promulgated an “Application for Purchase (Partially-Manufactured Frame or Receiver for a Pistol or Rifle)” form, SP 4-121, which must be completed in addition to “a PICS background check and unique approval number [being] completed and received in order to facilitate a lawful sale/transfer of a PMFR [(“Partially Manufactured Frame or Receiver”)] under Pennsylvania law.”
...
But, what are PMFRs? Neither the letter nor the form define them in any way and all licensees are left to guess whether a non-object firearm constitutes a firearm under this undefined term. Thus, the PSP wants dealers to “guess” at what constitute PMFRs and if you get it wrong, don’t worry, you’re only looking at felony offenses…
Politicians who say "We won't tell you exactly what this means, but you have to obey it, and if you guess wrong you go to jail" need to become lamppost decorations.
...
But, what are PMFRs? Neither the letter nor the form define them in any way and all licensees are left to guess whether a non-object firearm constitutes a firearm under this undefined term. Thus, the PSP wants dealers to “guess” at what constitute PMFRs and if you get it wrong, don’t worry, you’re only looking at felony offenses…
Politicians who say "We won't tell you exactly what this means, but you have to obey it, and if you guess wrong you go to jail" need to become lamppost decorations.
Sunday, January 12, 2020
Scene from the range
"I want to rent a Glock."
"Ok, which one?"
That look, followed by "How many are there?"
This took a minute to clear up.
"Ok, which one?"
That look, followed by "How many are there?"
This took a minute to clear up.
How you know it's past time to start decorating
trees with politicians and bureaucrats:
Starting January 8, 2020, in certain situations residents will have to register their wood stoves with the state of Alaska. For those who already have a wood stove, it is voluntary.
Right up until the make it mandatory.
Starting January 8, 2020, in certain situations residents will have to register their wood stoves with the state of Alaska. For those who already have a wood stove, it is voluntary.
Right up until the make it mandatory.
Saturday, January 11, 2020
The snow, as previously mentioned, didn't show,
but the cold definitely did. If you're indoors and warm, here's some material to take your mind off the temperature
'The Director regrets the omissions and errors his Holy Special Agents committed
and will see that training is done to prevent it happening again.'
Translation: "I'm really sorry a bunch of our agents and lawyers were caught lying under oath and faking evidence, and I'll see a training class is done to prevent it in the future. But I have NO intention of further punitive action(at least that you'll ever hear of) against the Special Agents who committed these crimes.
Criminal charges? Against FBI agents? Are you serious?"
Apparently the idea that "Unless you ACTUALLY CLEAN THIS SHIT UP, including firings and prosecutions, nobody will ever trust your Very Special Agents ever again" just does not get through to these clowns.
Translation: "I'm really sorry a bunch of our agents and lawyers were caught lying under oath and faking evidence, and I'll see a training class is done to prevent it in the future. But I have NO intention of further punitive action(at least that you'll ever hear of) against the Special Agents who committed these crimes.
Criminal charges? Against FBI agents? Are you serious?"
Apparently the idea that "Unless you ACTUALLY CLEAN THIS SHIT UP, including firings and prosecutions, nobody will ever trust your Very Special Agents ever again" just does not get through to these clowns.
Friend, who hates Trump, had a link on Fecesbook
to a piece in NYMag titled
What Will Happen to The Trump Toadies?
Look to Nixon’s defenders, and the Vichy collaborators, for clues.*
I did a bit of skimming, and it's about what you'd expect: "Anyone who works for/supports Trump is either evil and connected with Putin, or stupid! But the Arc of History always bends toward Justice, and will deal with them!"
I'll give you one bit from the start:
Donald Trump proves daily that there is no longer any penalty for doing wrong as long as you deny everything, never say you’re sorry, and have co-conspirators stashed in powerful places to put the fix in.
Amazing, isn't it? And that level of projection is probably harmful to the brain. I do wonder how they'd react to mention of lying EffingBI/CIA/DoJ hacks caught with their hand in the cookie jar. And Democrats who cannot find any wrong in anything Hillary did.
First, it's amazing how much people who claim that 'Othering' people is Bad, work so hard at it when its someone they don't like.
Second, this is how they see anyone who doesn't mouth the right words and vote the right way: you're either evil or stupid, and should be ruled by the Correct-Thinking betters.
Michael Z Williamson once said that 'The only thing more stupid than a Trump lover is a Trump hater.' Seems to be on to something there.
*No, I'm not giving these asshats clicks, if you want to read it it'll be easy to find
What Will Happen to The Trump Toadies?
Look to Nixon’s defenders, and the Vichy collaborators, for clues.*
I did a bit of skimming, and it's about what you'd expect: "Anyone who works for/supports Trump is either evil and connected with Putin, or stupid! But the Arc of History always bends toward Justice, and will deal with them!"
I'll give you one bit from the start:
Donald Trump proves daily that there is no longer any penalty for doing wrong as long as you deny everything, never say you’re sorry, and have co-conspirators stashed in powerful places to put the fix in.
Amazing, isn't it? And that level of projection is probably harmful to the brain. I do wonder how they'd react to mention of lying EffingBI/CIA/DoJ hacks caught with their hand in the cookie jar. And Democrats who cannot find any wrong in anything Hillary did.
First, it's amazing how much people who claim that 'Othering' people is Bad, work so hard at it when its someone they don't like.
Second, this is how they see anyone who doesn't mouth the right words and vote the right way: you're either evil or stupid, and should be ruled by the Correct-Thinking betters.
Michael Z Williamson once said that 'The only thing more stupid than a Trump lover is a Trump hater.' Seems to be on to something there.
*No, I'm not giving these asshats clicks, if you want to read it it'll be easy to find
'Possible 1-3 inches of snow'
Which is actually a few stray flakes drifting around.
This is after the threats of 'Scattered showers all day, some may be severe!'
(grumbles of future "Why do we listen to these people?")
This is after the threats of 'Scattered showers all day, some may be severe!'
(grumbles of future "Why do we listen to these people?")
Friday, January 10, 2020
'...whose expertise includes urban ecological design, spatial politics,
and social mobilization in the issues of climate change and global urbanization'
Really tells you all you need to know, doesn't it?
No. I don't want to live in either the old Soviet Union or the blocks of Judge Dredd's world, you scrofulous idiot.
Really tells you all you need to know, doesn't it?
No. I don't want to live in either the old Soviet Union or the blocks of Judge Dredd's world, you scrofulous idiot.
Thursday, January 09, 2020
About that range day,
Had half a dozen loads in .45-70 I wanted to test, but a phone call cut my time short, so was only able to try four. All bullets were cast of 20-1.
First was the Lee 405-grain hollowbase over 70.0 grains of 2f black, with a .060 wad between bullet and powder
I have no idea where the first one went. I suspected high, so I lowered the rear sight, and got this. Not a bad group, not outstanding.
This was the prize: 500-grain Lyman roundnose bullet over 65.0 2f, .060 wad
That far/right was me, one of those where just as the trigger breaks you know you pulled it a bit. Those other four were right on aim.
This was a smokeless load I've tried before, 525-grain Lyman Postell, 23.0 Accurate 5744, the usual wad under the bullet
Bad breath control on my part. Every time I haven't watched it, I've gotten that vertical stringing. It's shot quite well before, and if not for me would have this time as well. Which leads us to #4, same everything except 24.0 grains
The first was that very high hole. Lowered the rear sight, two more, my second 'knew I blew it' of the day, and one more. Definitely trying this one again(yes, I recorded all the sight settings).
I did remember to take the tripod and Chrony today but discovered that the tripod isn't high enough for the way the ground drops in front of the firing line. I'll have to figure a way to extend the vertical pipe so I can check the velocities. That last one must've made a big jump over the 23.0 load. Easy ejection, no bad signs on the primers, and this is well below the max load in the Lyman manual.
And thus went most of that trip, all I had time for otherwise was checking zero on another rifle. So now I need to make up some more of these, and hopefully be able to shoot the others, next time.
First was the Lee 405-grain hollowbase over 70.0 grains of 2f black, with a .060 wad between bullet and powder
I have no idea where the first one went. I suspected high, so I lowered the rear sight, and got this. Not a bad group, not outstanding.
This was the prize: 500-grain Lyman roundnose bullet over 65.0 2f, .060 wad
That far/right was me, one of those where just as the trigger breaks you know you pulled it a bit. Those other four were right on aim.
This was a smokeless load I've tried before, 525-grain Lyman Postell, 23.0 Accurate 5744, the usual wad under the bullet
Bad breath control on my part. Every time I haven't watched it, I've gotten that vertical stringing. It's shot quite well before, and if not for me would have this time as well. Which leads us to #4, same everything except 24.0 grains
The first was that very high hole. Lowered the rear sight, two more, my second 'knew I blew it' of the day, and one more. Definitely trying this one again(yes, I recorded all the sight settings).
I did remember to take the tripod and Chrony today but discovered that the tripod isn't high enough for the way the ground drops in front of the firing line. I'll have to figure a way to extend the vertical pipe so I can check the velocities. That last one must've made a big jump over the 23.0 load. Easy ejection, no bad signs on the primers, and this is well below the max load in the Lyman manual.
And thus went most of that trip, all I had time for otherwise was checking zero on another rifle. So now I need to make up some more of these, and hopefully be able to shoot the others, next time.
Wednesday, January 08, 2020
Yesterday was a range day,
though it was cut a bit short. Had a couple of interesting results, which I'll update this with more later.
Right now I've got to catch up on the stuff I'd planned to do yesterday after the range.
Right now I've got to catch up on the stuff I'd planned to do yesterday after the range.
Tab clearing
Snowy owls in Detroit. Considering the amount of rats and such to eat, why not?
March For Our Lives Raised Nearly All Funding from Secret Six-Figure Donations
The gun-control group responsible for a 2018 march on Washington, D.C., raised the vast majority of its funds from undisclosed donations over six figures, a recently released tax document shows.
Let's say I'd want proof of actual 'threats of severe violence' before I'll believe them.
Yes, the enviroweenies are (still) full of shit.
Those states/cities trying to run the NRA out of existence? Didn't go so well for them.
Apparently the dickheads at CNN really didn't want this to go to court.
March For Our Lives Raised Nearly All Funding from Secret Six-Figure Donations
The gun-control group responsible for a 2018 march on Washington, D.C., raised the vast majority of its funds from undisclosed donations over six figures, a recently released tax document shows.
Let's say I'd want proof of actual 'threats of severe violence' before I'll believe them.
Yes, the enviroweenies are (still) full of shit.
Those states/cities trying to run the NRA out of existence? Didn't go so well for them.
Apparently the dickheads at CNN really didn't want this to go to court.
Tuesday, January 07, 2020
Some of the asshats running Virginia really seem to want the boogaloo
to kick off.
They want to shut down every gun range in the state that isn’t owned by the government.
According to House Bill 567, any indoor shooting range would be prohibited by law – UNLESS it was inside of a building owned or leased by the state.
And any business owners who decided to defy the law could be facing up to a $100,000 fine and potential additional civil penalties.
And the ones allowed to stay open will have to have complete records of whoever shoots there. Because that registration won't happen voluntarily.
They want to shut down every gun range in the state that isn’t owned by the government.
According to House Bill 567, any indoor shooting range would be prohibited by law – UNLESS it was inside of a building owned or leased by the state.
And any business owners who decided to defy the law could be facing up to a $100,000 fine and potential additional civil penalties.
And the ones allowed to stay open will have to have complete records of whoever shoots there. Because that registration won't happen voluntarily.
Monday, January 06, 2020
Just how badly has the Evil Party screwed up the impeachment?
This badly.
The witness was Charles Kupperman, a deputy to former national security adviser John Bolton. Other than Bolton himself, Kupperman is one of the officials most likely to have direct knowledge of an alleged quid pro quo on aid to Ukraine. After subpoenaing him last fall, the House withdrew its request before the court could rule on compelling his testimony for the record. The House also decided not to subpoena Bolton or any other key witnesses in the administration. Judge Richard Leon dismissed the case before New Years Eve with a hint of frustration, if not bewilderment, that the House did not seem interested in hearing from a possible eyewitness. Historically, that lack of attention in not only witnesses but also a triable case will remain one of the most baffling blunders of this impeachment.
...
Schiff is not the only Democrat undermining the case for the obstruction article. Representative Eric Swalwell, who seeks to be a House manager at the Senate trial, recently declared that not only should a sitting president be impeached if he goes to the courts rather than submit to Congress, but that contesting demands for evidence is actually evidence of guilt on all of the charged offenses. In a complete denial of the critical concepts of the rule of law and due process, Swalwell claimed “we can only conclude that you are guilty” if someone refuses to give testimony or documents. It is unclear if his concept of due process would be extended to President Obama, who refused both critical witnesses and documents to Congress on the basis of claims that were eventually dismissed by federal courts as untenable. Likewise, former Vice President Joe Biden has made headlines by declaring that, if subpoenaed, he would defy the Senate. But someone must have explained to Biden that the man he seeks to replace was just impeached for defying the House, even without a subpoena, because he clarified his earlier remarks by stating the opposite in a later interview.
Why, you'd think this was being done by a bunch of incompetent partisan hacks or something...
The witness was Charles Kupperman, a deputy to former national security adviser John Bolton. Other than Bolton himself, Kupperman is one of the officials most likely to have direct knowledge of an alleged quid pro quo on aid to Ukraine. After subpoenaing him last fall, the House withdrew its request before the court could rule on compelling his testimony for the record. The House also decided not to subpoena Bolton or any other key witnesses in the administration. Judge Richard Leon dismissed the case before New Years Eve with a hint of frustration, if not bewilderment, that the House did not seem interested in hearing from a possible eyewitness. Historically, that lack of attention in not only witnesses but also a triable case will remain one of the most baffling blunders of this impeachment.
...
Schiff is not the only Democrat undermining the case for the obstruction article. Representative Eric Swalwell, who seeks to be a House manager at the Senate trial, recently declared that not only should a sitting president be impeached if he goes to the courts rather than submit to Congress, but that contesting demands for evidence is actually evidence of guilt on all of the charged offenses. In a complete denial of the critical concepts of the rule of law and due process, Swalwell claimed “we can only conclude that you are guilty” if someone refuses to give testimony or documents. It is unclear if his concept of due process would be extended to President Obama, who refused both critical witnesses and documents to Congress on the basis of claims that were eventually dismissed by federal courts as untenable. Likewise, former Vice President Joe Biden has made headlines by declaring that, if subpoenaed, he would defy the Senate. But someone must have explained to Biden that the man he seeks to replace was just impeached for defying the House, even without a subpoena, because he clarified his earlier remarks by stating the opposite in a later interview.
Why, you'd think this was being done by a bunch of incompetent partisan hacks or something...
Anyone messed around with one of the old Savage 340-series rifles?
Coworker picked one up recently, and likes it. I'm wondering about the barrel band that holds the barrel to stock about 2" back from the forend tip. If you've ever used on, did you try removing the band to see if it would affect accuracy?
I did do some digging around, and found the usual mix of opinions. The design only uses one receiver screw to hold it into the stock, so the ones removing the band that sounded best(to me) involved bedding the receiver and first few inches of barrel and free-floating the rest, or bedding the receiver and barrel full-length.
I did do some digging around, and found the usual mix of opinions. The design only uses one receiver screw to hold it into the stock, so the ones removing the band that sounded best(to me) involved bedding the receiver and first few inches of barrel and free-floating the rest, or bedding the receiver and barrel full-length.
"THEY'E JUST LIKE SLAVERY SUPPORTERS!!"
Yeah. Right. From a clown in the Washington Post:
In linking it to slavery, he wrote, “A sad irony is that the ‘sanctuary’ movement conjures the disturbing nullification movements of the past three centuries in Virginia. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison argued that the states have the right to ignore federal laws they consider unconstitutional. That thinking was applied to proslavery movements, leading to the Civil War and the fight over integration in the 1950s and 1960s.”
How much you want to bet that he LOVES the idea of sanctuary cities and counties for illegal aliens?
But that, of course, is different.
In linking it to slavery, he wrote, “A sad irony is that the ‘sanctuary’ movement conjures the disturbing nullification movements of the past three centuries in Virginia. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison argued that the states have the right to ignore federal laws they consider unconstitutional. That thinking was applied to proslavery movements, leading to the Civil War and the fight over integration in the 1950s and 1960s.”
How much you want to bet that he LOVES the idea of sanctuary cities and counties for illegal aliens?
But that, of course, is different.
Sunday, January 05, 2020
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















































