Saturday, September 22, 2012

One more 'I'm not attacking gun rights!' attack, this time

- again- on ammo and magazines.  Plus the standard "You can't fight helicopters and tanks and---" argument. 

Did you know that anybody who 'stockpiles thousands of rounds' is planning a massacre?  and that No one except a terrorist, criminal, or mass murderer needs a 30-round magazine.?
Me neither.

I left a comment; I could have been a bit more polite, but I'm really tired of this crap.

1 comment:

Luton Ian said...

"I left a comment; I could have been a bit more polite, but I'm really tired of this crap."

in lefty speak, that translates to:

"angry aggressive, hateful and unwilling to engage in civil discourse"


I'm like that too, when they cease advocating death threats enforceable on me by the statist fat blue line*, I'll stop hurting their sensitive little feelings.
________________________________________
*the difference between advice or recommendations, which can be safely ignored with more or less unpleasantness, and a law; any law, even the most menial jaywalking seatbelt or dog fouling law, is that a law is backed up by a credible death threat.

If I fail to pay their fine, refuse to show up infront of their statist clown with a wig.
Refuse to go allong with the doughnut munchers when they tell me to, and defend myself when they try to kidnap me...

They will follow established procedures (murder me)

that is what defines a law - a death threat.