A: Is blogger just unable to refrain from screwing with things,

or do they actually think this crap helps?
You can't see it on the blog, but the whole 'posting' page has changed.  PITA.

B: Our President can't be bothered with disrupting his campaign schedule(nice excuse, huh?) to meet with Israeli officials, but he'll make time for the Egyptian President; probably to discuss how to turn the Blink Sheikh loose as quietly as possible.


C: If this woman was willing to turn loose and beat the crap out of this cleric, things are likely to get real interesting in Iran.


D: On Libya and various lies:  
The officials provided the information to the Washington Guardian, saying they feared the Obama administration’s scant description of the episode left a misimpression that the two ex-Navy SEALs might have been responsible for the ambassador’s personal safety or become separated from him. 

“Woods and Doherty weren’t part of the detail, nor were they personally responsible for the ambassador’s security, but they stepped into the breach when the attacks occurred and their actions saved others lives — and they shouldn’t be lumped in with the security detail,” one senior official said, speaking only on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the State Department. 


E: Iranian subs; yeah, this'll work out well.


F: Some media decides to do some of the reporting that should've been done, oh, four years ago.


G: Another example of why the UN should be considered the enemy of freedom.


Now I think I'll go do some sanding, and take some pictures.