or such a left-wing squirrel that he actually believes this:
"I am determined to defeat our enemies," Holder said in his address to the American Constitution Society. "But victory and security will not come easily. And they won’t come at all if we adhere to a rigid ideology, adopt a narrow methodology, or abandon our most effective terror-fighting weapon -- our Article Three [civilian] court system."
"Without civilian law enforcement and Article Three courts, our ability to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat terror plots; to secure actionable intelligence; to enlist international cooperation; and to punish those who have -- and who intend to -- harm Americans would be seriously damaged," Holder declared to considerable applause from the audience of about 700. "We must speak out. And we must set the record straight."
And left-wing lawyers- the kind who volunteer to defend terrorists and enemy combatants- cheer. Big surprise.
He actually seems to believe you can fight a war according to the niceties of civilian courts and law.
2 comments:
He actually seems to believe you can fight a war according to the niceties of civilian courts and law.
So he'll be kicking the ATF around over Gunwalker, then?
Yeah, right.
He believes in fighting America's foreign enemies according to domestic law. The Democratic Party's domestic enemies rate no such consideration.
IF you feel that the terrorists you are fighting are the CITIZENS IN THE COUNTRY who object to your racist/communist ideology, well then of course you want to use civilian courts where you can control the playing field and own the referees.
Post a Comment