and what they want is your guns and you either imprisoned or dead.
Under the proposed law, California gun owners could face a loss of
their Second Amendment gun rights and confiscation of their firearms
without prior warning. The proposed law allows the government up to two
weeks following the issuance of a restraining order to set a hearing in
which the subject of the order could argue for the reinstatement of
their Second Amendment rights and return of any firearms seized.
...
“The subject of a restraining order and confiscation warrant may
not even know they have been accused until there’s a SWAT team at their
door.”
According to the bill’s text, courts would be required to issue a
restraining order if a person–who doesn’t even have to know the target
of the order–submits a form saying that a gun owner “poses a significant
risk of personal injury to himself, herself, or others by owning or
possessing” guns.
My, such fascist wet dreams these people have. The two bastards introducing this being Democratic California Assembly Members Nancy Skinner (Berkeley) and Das Williams (Santa Barbara).
But wait! It gets even better!
But the restraining orders aren’t the only problem with the bill,
according to CAL-FFL. Assembly Bill 1014 would also mandate that courts
order a “firearms seizure warrant” following a restraining order,
forcing police and local law enforcement to “seize any firearms in the
possession of the named person…from any place, or from any person in
whose possession the firearm may be.”
CAL-FFL warned that the broad language of the seizure warrant could
lead not only to midnight “no-knock” raids against the subject of the
restraining order–who may not even know that their gun rights have been
stripped away and that they are now a “prohibited person”–but also the
homes of their friends and family, and even places of employment.
Just think of assholes with badges like the ones who shot up two trucks full of innocent people making SWAT raids to seize firearms. And using ANY excuse during the raid to kill people("Hey, we knew they were armed so we couldn't take chances! Sorry about the kids.")
1 comment:
"courts would be required to issue a restraining order if a person–who doesn’t even have to know the target of the order–submits a form saying that a gun owner “poses a significant risk of personal injury to himself, herself, or others by owning or possessing” guns."
So, this bill legalizes "Swatting?"
Or, to make it more clear, Swatting is no longer a crime.
Or, the Law is immune from the consequences of a "Swatting" gone violent, whether through defensive moves or a SWAT team with over active imaginations.
Post a Comment