Monday, August 05, 2013

CDR Salamander on the Army's new ammo:

So, anyone consult an infantryman on this?


But they've got it all under control and we can trust them, right?
USA TODAY obtained a copy of the FBI's 2011 report under the Freedom of Information Act. The report does not spell out what types of crimes its agents authorized, or how serious they were. It also did not include any information about crimes the bureau's sources were known to have committed without the government's permission.
...
The rules require the FBI — but not other law enforcement agencies — to report the total number of crimes authorized by its agents each year. USA TODAY asked the FBI for all of the reports it had prepared since 2006, but FBI officials said they could locate only one, which they released after redacting nearly all of the details.
Well, if they can't locate their own damned reports, why should we trust them to find their own ass, let alone bad guys?

Other federal law enforcement agencies, including the ATF and the DEA, said last year that they cannot determine how often their informants are allowed to break the law.
The obvious question being "WHY THE HELL NOT?"


Mark Glaze of Mayors Against People Owning Guns is one of two things:
A freaking dirtbag, or- if he believes what he said-
A freaking moron on the level of Joe Biden.


Miguel speaks to a gun bigot who's either hugely ignorant, or a damned liar.  And making false criminal charges, yet.



1 comment:

Keith said...

The British cartridges for use in Africa, such as the H&H, Rigby and Jeffries mags, were all loaded to about 40K PSI or less, to allow extraction under hot and dusty conditions.

There's also a reason why the likes of .222rem, .222mag, and .280 rem have reputations for fine accuracy compared to the likes of .223rem and .270 Win

The first group are loaded to 40K PSI and the second group to an case bulging, extractor snapping, barrel eroding and accuracy destroying 65K.