of an armed dumbass in LA. Dumbass was drunk, threatened people with a knife, and when a cop told him repeatedly to drop the knife he advanced on the officer who demonstrated good judgment and marksmanship and killed him.
Dumbass was an illegal alien.
Therefore the illegal aliens and the anti-cop clowns immediately had fits and rioted, all the usual.
Jack Dunphy's take here.
As he says, when an illegal alien-loving mayor like Villaraigosa comes out and says flatly "The officer acted correctly", that should tell you something.
One of the things I've had pointed out to me over the years is just how nasty a weapon a knife is. And that 'close' can start at a good twenty feet(further with a big knife/big man/fast man). Can't remember the exact words, but one of the cops teaching my CCW class said "If you pull a knife on me and you're inside twenty feet, I'm going to shoot you twice in the chest and once in the head, just like I was trained to" while going through the "This is a lethal threat, this is not" stuff. None of which matters, of course; the clowns rioting wouldn't care if the bastard had cut or stabbed half-a-dozen people, they'd still accuse the cops of murder and riot and burn because
They hate all authority, especially of American officials, and
They want control. Of the whole place.
So screw the rioters, and screw the "They didn't have to shoot him" people.
I had the opportunity to have a discussion with a few of the more rational and sober members of the crowd, all of whom asked me why the officer had to shoot Jamines rather than use some lesser level of force. Like many police officers, I carry a folding knife similar to the one Jamines was said to be wielding when he was shot. I showed it to my interlocutors, holding the serrated blade close to their faces. “Do you think I could hurt you with this?” I asked, watching their eyes widen at the readily apparent lethality of the blade. “And do you think you could stop me from hurting you without shooting me?” None of them had a ready answer.
And no one else does, either. Because if you come at a cop with a knife, you’d better plan on getting shot.
The 'Carter or O'Donnell?' quiz.
Hehehehehe...
(thanks to Theo)
Speaking of:
Thanks to the Tech Guy
NOT the kind of fishing I'd like to do. And I thought socialism/communism solved all those problems? Or is it the Chicoms just ' aren't the right people/aren't doing it the right way'?
By the way, also from the Tech Guy on the lady having to go into hiding because 'Draw Mohammed Day' got the usual reaction from the usual suspects,
If you claim that Islam is peace and that Islam is not violent, I demand that you publicly vow to protect this woman from harm to put your own lives on the line to protect hers and to demand that the fatwa against her is removed.
In the name of Molly Norris I defy you murderous Bastards!
I will give you a week. Till then this post will be on top of my blog. And if you don’t like the description “Murderous bastards” then stop acting like murderous bastards!
Amen.
Why is it that the necessary means of progressives so often mean killing people and taking their stuff? Isn't that what they accuse conservatives/libertarians/leave me the hell alone people of doing?
Ah, so we should listen to Mexico about borders? Good idea! Let's build an actual friggin' wall too!
The Inter-Press Sevice (IPS) is reporting that the head administrator of the Mexican Superintendency of Tax Administration, Raul Diaz, has confirmed that his government is building a wall in the state of Chiapas, along the Mexican/Guatemalan border.
The official reason is to stop contraband from coming into Mexico, but as Diaz admitted: “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”
According to Mexico's National Commission on Human Rights, 500,000 people from Central America cross into Mexico illegally every year.
No comments:
Post a Comment