I've lost track.
In this particular case, Bloomberg, GFW mayor of New York 'effin City. Having just had his little "Let us get together and ban guns" conference, and having announced his 'sting' operation, over at Uncles' we find that
His bullshit 'sting' screwed up some actual criminal investigations, which may well- and SHOULD- get both him and his buttmonkeys in some real legal trouble(seems they may have actually violated the law as well as screwing up real LE investigations), and
so far, it appears that the shops may not have broken the law: ""It's the same scenario repeated many, many, many times," Farmer said. "Husbands buy guns for their wives, boyfriends buy for their girlfriends, fathers buy for their daughters."
and
"The woman filled out papers registering the sale and signed a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives declaration saying she was the buyer and buying for someone else, he said.
Men routinely advise women on what guns to buy, Mickalis said, adding "I think they were specifically sent here to create a lawsuit."
Gee, you think maybe?
So we've got people doing things for Bloomberg that were quite possibly violations of law and that appear to have been falsely reported to say the shops were breaking the law. So besides the possible criminal violations, would falsely accusing some store owner/personnel of breaking the law be something they could take him to civil court for? As is 'sue the city of NY's collective ass off?'
If the bastard did this to me, I'd damn sure be talking to a lawyer about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment