when they consider the possible consequences of this...
And when the President, deputy Attorney General, and, by extension, the Attorney General have all stated that they are going to ignore existing federal laws, how can you be surprised at news articles like this: Connecticut recently registered 50,000 “assault weapons” and 40,000 “large capacity magazines”. Ignore, for a second, the complete and utter stupidity of the arbitrarily-defined concept of “assault weapons”, ignore that the magazines being banned are, in fact and truth, normal-capacity magazines in the overwhelming number of cases, and ignore that registration of firearms never ends well for their owners; instead, just pay attention to the numbers. By all definitions I am aware of (including Connecticut’s), an “assault weapon” involves a removable magazine. Do the morons in Hartford really believe that 10,000 “assault weapon” owners somehow do not have magazines for their firearms? And that the remaining 40,000 “assault weapon” owners only have one, single, solitary magazine for them? And this is all without considering the “large capacity magazines” that are made for handguns…
Are Connecticut politicians that stupid? Well, they are politicians, I suppose.
Apparently the last speculative accounting of “high capacity magazines” and “assault weapons” in the state of Connecticut numbered them in the “tens of millions” and somewhere around 400,000, respectively. To describe what is going on in the now-atrociously-mis-nicknamed “Constitution State” as “massive” civil disobedience would be something of a massive understatement.
1 comment:
I don't own a single relevant rifle that doesn't have a least a handful of magazines, and neither does anyone else I know who has one in the category.
Imagine that.
Post a Comment