The Mexican .gov thinks it has a solution to the vigilante groups:

The government said it had reached an agreement with vigilante leaders to incorporate the armed civilian groups into old and largely forgotten quasi-military units called the Rural Defense Corps.
"We'll make them part of the .gov, that'll fix the problem!"

Couple of problems: leaders of some of the groups gathered Monday to discuss the agreement, but it was not yet clear for them what it would imply.  Translation: "You bastards sent the Army after us, and they killed some of us, and now you want us to sign on?  Where are the catches in this?"   Also
Vigilante leaders will have to submit a list of their members to the Defense Department, and the army will apparently oversee the groups, which the government said "will be temporary." They will be allowed to keep their weapons as long as they register them with the army.
Two BIG catches there: will they trust the Army not to use the lists to arrest people, or hand the list over to the cartel?  And why would they trust the Army not to us the registration list to come after them later("You people aren't allowed guns like that, so hand it over or else!")?


Some tab clearing:
Up in Washington state, "We don't care if you use a real address, going after gun nuts is IMPORTANT!"


What was really behind pushing for everyone to go to college?


The NYEffingTimes is a partisan rag(big surprise to hear, right?)


Let's see, violations of federal law, violations of ethics, stonewalling Congress... at this point the question is 'Why WOULD anyone trust the IRS?  About anything?'


Hey, did you know that it's legal to tax a constitutional right and that making a requirement to report the name, address and firearm info to the authorities isn't 'really' registration?


'Climate change vs. free speech'