They can change the definitions. Expand them.
Biden called adjudication “a very high standard, basically being involuntarily committed to a mental institution.”
“We’re going to introduce legislation next week that says that if you
are believed to be a risk to yourself or to others by your health care
professional(no definition given, or standards), that that health care professional would have an
obligation to report that fact to a police agency who then would
initiate a process to — to make sure that you do not possess a firearm,”
said the vice president’s son.
“You would have due process rights and you have a judicial
proceeding(for now). But to make sure that those people who are mentally ill,
that doctors believe shouldn’t be in possession of a weapon, don’t have
them,” Biden continued. “Only 1300 people in 2010, for instance, were
prohibited from possessing firearms because they were adjudicated
mentally ill. This will broaden that category of people. We’ll have due
process built into it. It will be constitutional and I think save lives,
ultimately.”
Because we need LOTS of people banned from arms for this excus-ah, reason. Because it makes it so easy to disarm people, especially the way they'll decide things...
Apparently this crap runs in the Biden family.
1 comment:
Eff the statist snitches
there are alternatives - maybe even better alternatives
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_John's_wort
Post a Comment