oh, it's a winner:
'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,'
The screaming from vets and actual peace officers, not to mention bodyguards who aren't effing screwups, was deafening when they read that. Not to mention the other sniper teams who were on sloped roofs, but you can't let that get in the way of your excuses.
She then announced "The buck stops here, but don't expect me to resign, I'm doing great!"(or something like that)
A law enforcement official told the channel said that no action was taken after one of the snipers first spotted Crooks looking up at the roof of the building in Butler, Pennsylvania , just 130 yards from where the president would speak.
The sniper then radioed to a command post after seeing Crooks take out a rangefinder.
But no further action was taken before Crooks reappeared a third time, this time wearing a backpack and disappearing from sight as he walked to the back of the building.
A further radio report relaying the information was submitted by the sniper team who did not realize that Crooks was now scaling their building.
'Their building' because they were securing it from the inside...
Throw in the EffingBI having said they found out who he was from DNA(and I wonder if that was a real slip that they're regretting), and now playing "We have no idea of the motive" when they're not going through the social media they copied before they made it go away(you doubt it? Really?) But don't worry, their investigation will be professional, thorough, and will be sure to tell us what they want us to hear when it's done. Say, sometime two years from now.
Any wonder more and more people are deciding it couldn't just be incompetence, that this had to include some "Let's let him/someone have a shot at Trump"?
2 comments:
So, if your contention is that they "disappeared" his social media accounts (and I'm not saying you're wrong), the question is: why?
What are they hiding.
Let me cast your memory back to a time when federal agents, using social media, goaded several...um...non-rocket-scientists...into hatching a plan to kidnap the governor of Michigan...for which they promptly arrested them, making the FBI heroes or something.
Now...how much of a stretch of imagination would it take to picture an FBI or SS agent using social media to identify a vulnerable person and goad them into taking a shot at Trump? Maybe even hinting that a particular roof with a clear line of sight might just be unguarded during the event...
I'd imagine that would be something they'd want hidden don't you?
Not saying that's what happened, but it sure would connect some dots that are currently dangling wouldn't it?
Exactly. After a bunch of the stuff they've been caught at in the past years, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they did it again.
Or just found stuff that would be embarrassing to their lords & masters, so they want it to go away.
Lots of people pointed this out because the Feebs- and others- have trashed the trust people used to have in them. And the more they sit around playing "We can find no motive", the worse it makes it. They've put themselves in the position of, if they honestly couldn't find something, almost nobody would believe them.
Post a Comment