who lied to you!" Etc. Followed later by "We'll try to change history, because we don't have the ethics or balls to admit error."
There is now a near consensus that at the very least a lab leak is quite plausible, which has raised the question: why hasn’t Nature Medicine, the journal that published this paper that spawned a million censorships, looked into retracting the paper given its clear contradiction with both reality and with the now apparent opinions of the authors as they wrote the paper?
If the authors lied in the paper, shouldn’t it be retracted?
No. Because Nature Medicine is now rewriting history. The editor now claims that the paper wasn’t research at all, but an expression of an opinion. Just a “point of view.” It wasn’t definitive research, but an Op/Ed or something.
1 comment:
You keep saying the same thing over and over again, reality doesn't matter... The Big Lie at work.
Post a Comment