Monday, February 27, 2023

"Why, that's a conspiracy theory!" "From the Dept. of Energy?"

"Uh..."
The U.S. Energy Department has concluded that the Covid pandemic most likely arose from a laboratory leak, according to a classified intelligence report recently provided to the White House and key members of Congress.

The shift by the Energy Department, which previously was undecided on how the virus emerged, is noted in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines’s office. . . .

The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with “moderate confidence” and still holds to this view.
...
U.S. officials declined to give details on the fresh intelligence and analysis that led the Energy Department to change its position. They added that while the Energy Department and the FBI each say an unintended lab leak is most likely, they arrived at those conclusions for different reasons.

The full article is paywalled, this is from an excerpt at Instapundit.

So, what would get you shut down on Twatter and Fecesbook, and still causes problems at the latter, is now "Yeah, this is probably what happened."  Along with various medications and treatments that were 'misinformation' , 'conspiracy theory', etc., are now admitted as good treatments.  Not to mention admitting that natural immunity is at least as good protection as the 'vaccines'.

And they wonder why people don't trust them anymore.

5 comments:

Peaowed said...

Why is the Chinese flu a concern for the U.S. Dept of Energy?

Country Boy said...

Is this revelation supposed to be news? It's been pretty obvious since the bat soup claims fell apart.

Anonymous said...

That's cuz if the wu-flu infects the power grids, they'll have to "shut it down to slow the spread."
🤔-lg

rickn8or said...

Peaowed, and Butty-gag's DOT is worried about too many white men at construction sites.

Is there ANYONE in the Biden regime that operates under their assigned job description??

Anonymous said...

I've a similar question; why does USGS have biologists on permanent staff?