Sunday, March 20, 2005

In the tradition of Dan Rather journalism,

I'll state that the information in this earlier post may be 'fake but true'.

Joe Huffman has this followup on the information. It may not be a real memo. He also has links to a number of the gun-ban groups and their aims. Boils down to, the particular memo in question may have been fake; the aims of these groups are real.

No comments: