Add to that the bloody mess over the people caught near that airbase. At the least a bunch of people should be either demoted or fired over this crap. And their official reaction is "You people don't know enough about this to get all upset."
How did Britain get so terrorist friendly? Said elites and the janissaries that used to be known as police worked at it. Hard.
Now go further east. Madam Hoyt notes this:
Abroad… Well, I wonder how much is happening that we never hear about. Though so far the turn to the right of Europe is the kind that seems to be more “American Right” than the traditional European jackboots left that respects national leanings and history. It’s both salutary and it scares the spit out of the left. As it should. A lot of what they’ve done this century and a half is to keep the “infection” of Americanism from overtaking the world. And I think they might have thrown a boomerang at their own faces.
If you've looked at any news, you know that the German .gov, which is just as bad as the Brit, has been having cows about the German right("They're nazis! They're hard right! They're enemy!" etc.) and trying to figure out a way to play "We don't care if you won the elections, no power for you!" Which is working about as well as you'd think. We'll see how that works out. And the Poles are telling the EU to go to hell in various ways, also not turning into the Hitler or Stalin wannabes the little Stalins in Brussels want them to be.
Over here? We've got the mini-Stalins telling us they want to trash that nasty old Constitution and get on with their progressive "Do what you're told!" Which includes people that, when they find out more about Piker and that equally asshat El-Sayed have said and demanded, more people say "I don't think so", which has caused El-Sayed to play "He's not on my campaign(no matter how much he helps me)" as the elections draw close. They're playing the same as that clown Talarico in Texas, "Ignore all I've said and called for and vote for me, so I can go back to pushing the crap you don't want!"
We'll see what happens.
1 comment:
Something to consider -
President Trump recently signed a security agreement granting the United States permanent military access and security control in Greenland without acquiring the territory.
Why?
Because the US is going pull all US military assets out the UK.
The recent incident at RAF Fairford, considering the dodgy story behind it all, could quite easily be nothing more than a false flag operation. Its only purpose was to prove the UK is incapable of keeping US military operations safe and therefore provide a credible argument for why the US shouldn't remain in the UK.
Greenland is easy to protect and secure unlike the UK where military aged single men arrive on UK shores in inflatable boats on a daily basis under the full protection of a two-tier justice system.
Trump has the foresight to see how the influence of leftist-multiculturalism will turn the UK (and other European states) against any further support of military actions in the Middle East. That precedent started when the British government initially declined to permit the use of certain bases for initial offensive U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran.
Spain has already banned the US from Rota Naval Base and Moron Air Base for operations against Iran. France and Italy are also on the fence but that could change as quickly as the next election cycle.
If the UK, Spain, Italy and France are any indicator of how our so-called "NATO partners" support us, then the US should simply remove all military assets from Europe and leave Europe to it's own demise.
Post a Comment