Ok, we have AWFLs protesting in favor of the ayotollahs in Iran, while women in Iran risk their lives doing this
The AWFLs, as usual, are against freedom. Stolen from Mr. Correia on Bookface:
Heh. A friend of mine just saw a video where some AWFLs were protesting in DEFENSE of the Ayatollahs, and was like… dude… HOW?! WTF?!?
And my comment was if you ever want to guess what side of any given issue horrible bossy white liberal women will take, just ask yourself which of these two things is worse for western society, and they will be all over it. 
Try it. Pick an issue. Any issue. The less sense it makes the better.
Sex changes for children? Sure. Why not?
They’re even against electricity! For the environment!
Nicholas Maduro is a hero. What do all those dumb South Americans know?
Even if it harms other women, as long as it harms the fabric of society more. Like putting violent psychos with twenty prior arrests away? Nope. They are on team psycho killer all the way. If you don’t let him wander the subways with a dagger you’re racist.
Every week there is a new issue, and they will be confidently ass backwards on it, and smug about it.
Test it out for yourself in the comments. Think of any current event or news story from the last few years. What side of this issue hurts society the most? Then the AWFLs are all in.
Yeah. Also ran across this which seems to fit well:
The terrorism lovers are out, too
If Iran does indeed fall to the Persians, it'll be interesting to see what the left has to say.
Assuming we don't already know.
No comments:
Post a Comment