In October 2022, reports surfaced that federal prosecutors felt they had enough evidence to charge Hunter Biden over a false statement related to buying a gun, according to Politico, citing internal communications between Hunter’s legal team and the DOJ. Hunter Biden’s attorney Chris Clark wrote in a 32-page letter to U.S. Attorney David Weiss, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, arguing that the leak was “illegal,” and any charges brought would violate the Second Amendment and be viewed as a partisan attack.
“President Biden now unquestionably would be a fact witness for the defense in any criminal trial,” Clark wrote in the letter obtained by Politico. “This of all cases justifies neither the spectacle of a sitting President testifying at a criminal trial nor the potential for a resulting Constitutional crisis.”
Your client's male parent being put on the stand would not be a 'Constitutional crisis', you lying bastard, just a horrible problem for he and your client.
And then we have this:
The Department of Justice (DOJ)’s original deal with Hunter Biden would not have required him to plead guilty, according to documents obtained by Politico, but was altered after whistleblowers came forward shedding light on the DOJ’s handling of the case.
Hunter Biden’s lawyers sent a draft deal to prosecutors in May that not only included a version of the promise of broad immunity for future charges that appeared in the final deal, but also that their client need not plead guilty — a detail the DOJ initially accepted, Politico reported. DOJ prosecutor Lesley Wolf then sent Hunter’s legal team a list of “must-haves” as part of negotiations, with a guilty plea not included in the list.
But days after IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley publicly stated in an interview with CBS News that the DOJ “slow-walked” the investigation, prosecutors said Hunter Biden would need to plead guilty to the two misdemeanor tax charges, sources told Politico.
You can just imagine how fair and unbiased Weiss would be as a Special Counsel.
2 comments:
Weiss cannot legally be a Special Counsel as he is a U.S.Government employee. Fucking Garland knows this.
Can you imagine the mess Garland would make if he'd made it to SCOTUS?
If you notice Wiess was appointed "Special" Counsel. NOT Independent Counsel.
That means he works for Garland...who answers to Pedo Joe. Don't expect him to do anything but stir the pot and cover up as much of the Biden Family Crime Syndicate's dirt as possible.
Post a Comment