she's willing to say anything to get a conviction. Whole group attacking him, they're armed, and she says it wasn't self-defense because
...he shot four of the five men he fought with, and the number of bullets he fired — eight to 10 — was too many to be self-defense.
Yeah, she's an idiot, or 'say anything', or both. To decide "You weren't defending yourself because of the number of shots you fired" is...
4 comments:
My vote is for both
https://www.philly.com/news/jabir-kennedy-self-defense-philadelphia-district-attorney-handgun-murder-homicide-court-20190328.html
Fixed in post now, thanks
I have no doubts this DA is a commie demonrat. They DO NOT BELIEVE in the rights of the mere mundane citizen to defend themselves ( THEY of course are entitled to state funded protection).... Thus ANYONE who has the balls to use deadly force in self defense WILL BE PROSECUTED. The DA knew from day one that this was a LEGAL use of deadly force. She simply DID NOT CARE. This just another in a long line of
cases where 'The Process Is The Punishment'. The victim of her official persecution
is out TENS of thousands of dollars in legal fees, hundreds and hundreds of lost hours spent in jail, in court or with a lawyer. Add in the LIFE changing stress such
a trial creates (the type of stress that can EASILY cause a heart attack) and the victim of this DA has been HORRIFICALLY mistreated. And the DA? Not a DAMN THING will happen to her as punishment for abuse of her office. And until THAT SIMPLE FACT changes this type of state sponsored terrorism will continue.
Post a Comment