this was, why should we expect them to manage anything with some level of competence?
But let us move back to the main point: Ciaramella emailed the DoJ for their response to this issue… and the DoJ’s official response, in the form of one Office of Public Affairs spokeswoman Katie Dixon? Go read Media Matters for America (MMfA).
No, really.
So: it finally sunk in that
The article they sent him to doesn't deal with the questions,
It really isn't too damn smart to subcontract DoJ matters to frikkin' MEDIA MATTERS,
And it's especially idiotic when they realize the doofus 'taking care of this' is a Democrat activist. And there are tracks.
And it’s starting to look like this is sinking in over there, because the cover-up’s started. Breitbart.com has to keep updating its post on this scandal-within-a-scandal, because the sanitizing is ongoing. First, Kate Dixon’s prior (and previously public) links to the DNC, Organizing for America were hidden; now Dixon’s prior tweets are apparently being retroactively vetted – and when necessary, deleted. Needless to say, nobody’s talking over at DoJ – which means that nobody’s explaining whether all of these clumsy attempts to obscure the record are either Dixon’s own idea, or Justice’s.
Great to get an answer on that, by the way. And, hey: at least they’re tacitly admitting that getting caught at treating with MMfA too openly is a public relations disaster…
No comments:
Post a Comment