This is a post on stupid women(primarily) on the subject of

male babies.

I can see someone really looking forward to a daughter being upset when it's a son- or another son- but the bitching and upset at male babies...

The real insane types push pregnant women to, and may have themselves, to get an abortion if they find out it's a male they're carrying.  They're also the ones who, a while back, were expressing disgust at some actress having had a son, as in "I expected better of her, she should have aborted it!" opinions expressed loudly.

Which pisses me off for various reasons.  I've known couples who had one child and badly wanted more but were unable, others who desperately wanted kids but were unable to, they didn't care boys or girls, they wanted children of their own; to listen to these harpies talk about killing babies because "Men are toxic!" and other such bullshit...

Every once in a while I remember that my time on this world probably isn't too much longer, and not having to listen to these idiots anymore eases the sting a bit.

A good piece on the current state of men & women,

I'm going to quote part of it:
“The end result of liberal sexual ethics writ large — according to which women seldom say no and they can be, or should be, every bit as debauched as men — has not been a joyful bacchanal but a minefield. It’s a two-tiered system for the sexes.

Female sexuality is practically unlimited, but it’s not coupled with an expectation of responsibility or agency, or even the minimal requirement to know and clearly communicate one’s own mind. On the other side of the ledger, male sexuality is maximally constrained. In a reversal of biological fortune, men are now expected to be the brakes on sex, even when women directly advertise that they are eager and open to all comers. In the face of “free p****,” to quote one defendant’s vulgar chat message, they must either be rapists or monks…
Whole post is here

Very appropriate title: 'The 'Cornell 7' haven't been charged.

The mob doesn't care'
No, they don't.

And, considering the idiot statements by the NY Governor, and her appointment of an 'investigator' who'd made a 'I believe her' statement before she was chosen, they won't.  They want female voters outraged and seeking vengeance, justified or not.  They want women being told "You don't have to take care of yourself, Society should protect you from everything!  Do whatever you want, you should suffer no problems!"
No, this won't go well.  

Borrowing:
“We don’t owe accusers anything except to treat the accusation seriously, to investigate both sides’ claims, and to test the admissible evidence against clear laws. But that’s not what the leftists and feminists want to do here. That’s not what New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wanted done by appointing New York Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor. Hochul had already framed the young woman as a victim who was “literally gang raped,” and said she deserves to have “justice pursued.” Her catspaw James is supposed to run an objective criminal investigation? That’s a travesty. She has her marching orders, and she will march accordingly.”

And the lawsuits will follow, etc.

I added this to the 'campus rape' post, but I'll add it in here too

Camille Paglia is very tired of the "Women are all helpless victims, everything is someone else's- preferably a male's- fault!" crap.

A piece on the 'Rape On Campus' myth Addition

of "A quarter of all female students are raped!"
One excerpt:
So what reality does lie behind the campus rape industry? A booze-fueled hookup culture of one-night, or sometimes just partial-night, stands. Students in the sixties demanded that college administrators stop setting rules for fraternization. “We’re adults,” the students shouted. “We can manage our own lives. If we want to have members of the opposite sex in our rooms at any hour of the day or night, that’s our right.” The colleges meekly complied and opened a Pandora’s box of boorish, sluttish behavior that gets cruder each year. Do the boys, riding the testosterone wave, act thuggishly toward the girls? You bet! Do the girls try to match their insensitivity? Indisputably.

College girls drink themselves into near or actual oblivion before and during parties. That drinking is often goal-oriented, suggests University of Virginia graduate Karin Agness: it frees the drinker from responsibility and “provides an excuse for engaging in behavior that she ordinarily wouldn’t.” A Columbia University security official marvels at the scene at homecomings: “The women are shit-faced, saying, ‘Let’s get as drunk as we can,’ while the men are hovering over them.” As anticipated, the night can include a meaningless sexual encounter with a guy whom the girl may not even know. This less-than-romantic denouement produces the “roll and scream: you roll over the next morning so horrified at what you find next to you that you scream,” a Duke coed reports in Laura Sessions Stepp’s recent book Unhooked. To the extent that they’re remembered at all, these are the couplings that are occasionally transformed into “rape”—though far less often than the campus rape industry wishes.

Addition: Camille Paglia is very tired of the "Women are all helpless victims, everything is someone else's- preferably a male's- fault!" crap.

There's a lady named Sydney Sweeney who's managed to piss of the left enormously,

and seems to be making good money doing it.  To borrow from this guy's response to the question,

And she looks like this while doing it

Hoorah, lady, keep it up.


Personal note: I'd say could take it easier on the eye makup

Looking at some stuff on the Clancy trial indicates an awful lot of women are batshit crazy

Especially when they start feeding off each other.  Holy crap.  I recommend this piece at Battleswarm Blog.  

And this comment from the end:
Whoever came up with the “Clancy case is the OJ trial for AWFL feminists” analogy deserves a Pulitzer.

There's a case of a woman murdering her three kids, a lot of women are crying for her,

and there's some blowback I'll bet a lot of them didn't consider.

Yeah, if you've been thinking of marrying and having kids, and you find out your prospective wife/baby mother has no problem with killing inconvenient kids on whatever excuse...

'Why men left the dating pool'

Ran across this the other day and was finally able to watch it, and I think it's pretty good.

Here's the embed, and thanks to Wheelgunner for finding it

a bit of tab clearing

Yeah, you spend that much time hating men, it's going to be hard to attract one.


“Last year alone, Muslims kiIIled 500,000 Christians in only Nigeria. Why are they only talking about Palestine?"

The lefty Boomers packing these No Kings rallies have been wrong about everything. Literally everything.

Making a Crickett even lighter.  Because everyone needs a project.


Buy your whiskey properly

Also one reason a lot of guys have pretty much given up on dating, Link fixed

because here's one more thing they can be held responsible for, and blamed for.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one

tired of this level of makeup.  Kim had this picture

which brought this to mind this morning.  Not a bad looking woman, but jeez, all that MAKEUP...

Do women believe they need this level in order to look good, or has it just become the 'acceptable level' for pictures to go out in public, at least according to their, call them advisors?

A good piece, with some serious warnings for the future

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

The explanatory power of this simple thesis was incredible. It really did unlock the secrets of the era we are living in. Wokeness is not a new ideology, an outgrowth of Marxism, or a result of post-Obama disillusionment. It is simply feminine patterns of behavior applied to institutions where women were few in number until recently. How did I not see it before?

And one of the warnings:
These two approaches to the law clashed vividly in the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings. The masculine position was that, if Christine Blasey Ford can’t provide any concrete evidence that she and Kavanaugh were ever in the same room together, her accusations of rape cannot be allowed to ruin his life. The feminine position was that her self-evident emotional response was itself a kind of credibility that the Senate committee must respect.

If the legal profession becomes majority female, I expect to see the ethos of Title IX tribunals and the Kavanaugh hearings spread. Judges will bend the rules for favored groups and enforce them rigorously on disfavored groups, as already occurs to a worrying extent. It was possible to believe back in 1970 that introducing women into the legal profession in large numbers would have only a minor effect. That belief is no longer sustainable. The changes will be massive.

About the 'The left will really hate her now' post,

It seems Ms. Sweeney also likes working on her cars.

Damn, there's a lot to like about her.

Two articles: this could be an important piece for a lot of guys,

not just the ones in trouble, but those around them.


And this one could be just as important to a lot of women.

"Men: it's ALL YOUR FAULT!"

As usual.

Ever notice these people always find a way for women to avoid responsibility for something they're involved in?  Apparently saying "No, unless you wear a condom!" or "No, I'm not laying down on a first date/at a drunk party/who the hell are you?" isn't possible.  Or sexist.  Or something."

I'm reminded of a sign a lady had on her desk: "When women act like men, why can't they act like nice men?"
Short version: "Women, don't be jerks yourselves."  Which would probably get her reported to HR or hanged on social media today for being a misogynist.

Kim has a question about redheads,

specifically 'which of these would you really like a serious kiss with?'

Personally, I'd lean most toward Gina and Jill, having had a serious crush on both since I actually started noticing things about girls.

It's been a while since I had to worry about this, but I do remember the feeling

 

Ref 'Best thing that ever happened',

when daughter was at college, she told me that a couple of times, on Saturday mornings, she and a couple of friends wound find a shady spot near fraternity/sorority row and see if they could spot the girls doing the Walk of Shame back to their rooms.

I've always thought "If you feel ashamed after doing this, why the hell do you keep doing it?"

I've never heard a good answer. 

Sounds about right