Tuesday, June 13, 2023

I'd imagine this is causing some teeth-gnashing in DC

This is on the case against the ATF's 'your wrist-braced pistol is now a SBR' action:
In her prior order granting the preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Jane J. Boyle wrote; “The Court grants in part the Motion and issues a preliminary injunction as to Plaintiffs in this case only,” leaving a question as to whether the injunction applied to members of SAF. Late Thursday, SAF filed a motion to clarify the scope of the injunction. Friday, Judge Boyle clarified the prior order with a new order and in a docket entry which stated;

“The Court confirms that its Preliminary Injunction Order applies to both the Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. and its members.”


I'd say this is definitely not going as the .gov hoped

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Ithink the judge by that order just helped the SAF fund raise. If i had a pistol like that idea get a membership just so i was protected.

Exile1981