Friday, October 07, 2022

Hey, remember that mass shooting in Vegas which was all "We may never understand

his motive." ?
So what happened in Las Vegas?

Former FBI special agent John Guandolo told Turning Point USA in a recorded interview (below) that there’s a 90% certainty that the Las Vegas attack was a jihadi operation and Stephen Paddock was the conduit through which the terrorist organization attacked America.
...
In the interview, Guandolo said, “When you look at what actually transpired and put it together from a counter-espionage attack and counter-espionage look, the probability that was an ISIS attack is well over 90%.”

He said the special agent in charge of the Las Vegas FBI field office “got angry and dismissed it, and when presented with the information, FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., dismissed it out of hand.”

There's more.  And would it surprise you in the least?


8 comments:

markm said...

What the heck is supposed to be the evidence that this was an ISIS attack? The closest that article gets is that a friend of the shooter flew to Turkey; you need a lot more than that to even show a middle-eastern link for the shooter, let alone to ISIS or other jihadists.

Was the apparently non-religious shooter supposed to secretly be an insanely devout Muslem? There's nothing suggesting that.

Was he a mercenary? There's no evidence of his receiving an ISIS payoff. Mercenaries on suicide missions are rare, and he appears to have been wealthy enough in his own right to see his loved ones were left well off.

Sorry, this makes no sense. "The guy went nuts" may not be a very satisfactory explanation, but it's far more credible than "ISIS was controlling him". Most mass killings (after killings by gangs and other regular criminals are excluded) don't have much more motivation. Sometimes the shooter may have been bullied - or was a bully who couldn't handle victims pushing back - but there's never a motive that would cause a normal person to plot murder. At least once the shooter had an unsuspected brain tumor, but in every case it really comes down to "a guy went nuts".

Peaowed said...

So, Paddock had 5 cellphones and most of the calls were incoming. I'm no detective, but I'd think it is pretty damn important to know who made those calls to Paddock. I would assume the Eff Be Eye knows who called, but I'm not aware of any results being made public. Hmmm...

Firehand said...

'Just went nuts' can be the real explanation for some things, but generally there's a reason; may not make sense to someone else, but there is one.

There may be a lot more information- I would suppose- than the stuff listed; in any case, we know we've not heard nearly enough information from the feds.

Anonymous said...

Markm - if you are equally intellectually honest as. you are dismissive, invest in the time to review Mindy Robertson's video of her timeline regarding the art 91 shooting(s), as in up and down the strip. She asks very simple questions that have not been answered yet but any of the lead agencies. If the yet link doesn't work, try bitchute or search for her and uncovering the coverup. Triple dog dare you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TqYLQE6xxzk

Crotalus said...

Paddock wasn’t a jihadi, or anything like that. He was the patsy for a government black op, pure and simple. That’s why the feds won’t ever find a “motive”.

Justin_O_Guy said...

The reports that the shots were fired from a couple of windows, up on the sixth or seventh floor, whatever, that isn't what is important. I Never got to see the asphalt of the parking lot. Every bullet that hit the ground left a mark, pointing back to where it came from. So why did they Not show the parking lot?
Gee,Wally, why Didn't they show the parking lot?
Well, Beve, the parking lot had marks that were pointing in different directions and that would have immediately proved there was more than one shooter.

Anonymous said...

I have to agree that this is all just make believe. 90% is still uncertainty. They don't know. Or if they do know with certainty, they arent saying because it's worse than moslems. For example: it's gun control activists. It's obvious that FBI would cover up that, even if they had to float an "it's ISIS" balloon.

--generic

Anonymous said...

I think there's some credibility to the jihad inspired attack by proxy. The Philippines is a hotbed for Islamic and jihadi terror activities especially the southern part which is not that far from the largest Islamic population in the world -- Indonesia. I think the Filipino girlfriend may have been his handler and courier -- why did he wire her such a large amount of money? I wouldn't doubt that she did a mind-f%#k psy-op on Paddock which led him to do the atrocity. It doesn't matter if the girlfriend is muslim or not -- maybe the Jihadis threatened her relatives in the Philippines as blackmail/leverage. I think she's the key to this whole thing. Sadly, I don't think we'll ever know. The Feds investigating are so politically driven by their anti-Trump/anti-gun/white supremacist mindset they readily dismiss this possibility.