Fact: They’re not, even when you don’t account for the fact that some of the 8 survivors are being propped up. Remember that these women are the distillation of a pipeline of over 130 candidates, who got extra training no active-duty men can even apply for.
Myth: the Army has made no concessions to the women.
Fact: the concessions are many, ranging from the trivial (women’s hair is cut short, but not shaved like the men) to the serious (women are given extra chances and talked out of quitting; minor negative spot reports aren’t allowed to build up against them).
Etc. And an opinion on the Secretary of Defense:
Fact: You’re joking, right? Ash Carter makes Joe Biden look like the Great Gravitas Himself. He has no military experience whatsoever, and if he ever came out of the ivory tower, when he saw his own shadow we’d have six more weeks of winter. It’s not surprising he says stupid [stuff]. He didn’t stop there, either. He also hinted to the cadets that he intends to open all positions to women when the review is complete in 2016.
More on the leftists in Britain blowing up over some ads with bikinis:
Writer and co-founder of the Vagenda blog, Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett, had returned from Cuba to jarring reverse-culture shock in the “dark, putrid bowels of London’s underground system.”
It was only after visiting Cuba, a totalitarian country where there are no advertisements, that she realized “how much my field of vision is occupied without my consent by images and messages that want to sell me stuff (and, being a woman, it’s usually based on claims that it will make me look better).”
The emphasis here is mine. Cosslett is not simply deploying the language of sexual assault in a heavy-handed metaphor. She’s applying victimhood rhetoric to the larger feminist cause, depicting women as emotionally fragile and easily-traumatized, no matter how banal the offense.
Sounds like Cuba is her kind of place. Much like many of the clowns running universities here.
The cultural and political left is cocooning itself in a bubble of
ideological uniformity. This is intended to totally suppress dissent on
key issues by making it impossible for anyone to even express a
divergent opinion. The result is to entrench leftist dogma, in the hope
that a whole generation will graduate from college unable to engage in
thoughtcrime.
That’s the dilemma for anyone trying to overturn any aspect of this
dogma. How can you debate an issue and change anyone’s mind, when the
discussion has been rigged so that your viewpoint is dismissed as
illegitimate before anyone has even heard it? So the new orthodoxy seems
impenetrable and its hold on the young unbreakable.
Until they find themselves in a place where nobody cares about anything but getting the job done. That gets interesting.Simple: because this administration LIKES vote fraud. It counts on it.
On the New Democrat Hope for the White House:
The city eventually got sued by the ACLU and had to settle, but O’Malley defends the wholesale denigration of black civil rights to this day. Never mind what it did to your jury pool: now every single person of color in Baltimore knows the police will lie — and that's your jury pool for when you really need them for when you have, say, a felony murder case. But what it taught the police department was that they could go a step beyond the manufactured probable cause, and the drug-free zones and the humbles – the targeting of suspects through less-than-constitutional procedure. Now, the mass arrests made clear, we can lock up anybody, we don't have to figure out who's committing crimes, we don't have to investigate anything, we just gather all the bodies — everybody goes to jail. And yet people were scared enough of crime in those years that O’Malley had his supporters for this policy, council members and community leaders who thought, They’re all just thugs.
But he'll still vote for him. Because Democrat.
Speaking of, "The rich(except me, of course) should be paying more taxes!"
Still busy, and just about to go start it up again.
1 comment:
I would like to be a sociologist studying the effects the peer review system has had in Ranger school and how it has changed to accomodate women. Are the men giving the women a break? Are the cadre ignoring bad peers for women? Or are the women seriously earning their place among their peers?
I can tell you that peer evaluations have been eliminated everywhere in the army except Ranger school. Something about peers being racist and sexist.
Post a Comment