Wednesday, July 08, 2009

It's official: Obama is either a effing moron,

or actually trying to destroy this nation.
The G-8 leaders also agreed to a goal of having industrialized nations reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050. It would be part of a worldwide goal of a 50 percent cut in such gases from all nations, rich and poor.
Eighty Fucking Percent. Does this socialist loon not realize what that would mean, or is he looking forward to the destruction of our economy and standard of living?

And, you find, 'developing nations'- including the PRC and India- are exempt. These idiots 'hope' that they'll decide to commit suicide along with us, but those nations, while hoping we really are stupid enough to do this so they can take over the markets, are saying "Hell, no" in very diplomatic ways. Except for India a few days ago saying flatly that "We will not agree to this" because
A: they're not stupid or suicidal and
B: nobody can make them.
So they'll keep industrializing in any way they can because they want to grow and they've got people who want clean water coming out of pipes and power and don't give a damn about the idiocies of the fools in the G8.

Without killing off most of our population(which a bunch of the enviroweenies would like)AND destroying our industrial base I don't think there's any damned way to meet such a goal; and President B. Hussein Cartman Obama HAS to have some advisor somewhere telling him this; but they either don't believe it, don't care("It's a CRISIS, and we must exploit it!") or actually look forward to doing this to us.

Oh, I'm sure this bastard will be one of the 'elites' who have all the modern conveniences while everyone else is hoping to get back to the industrial level of the Civil War era(while freezing in the dark); after all, he and the other progressives have to keep shearing their flock, don't they?

Absolutely effing unbelievable that so many educated people are both buying this climate change bullcrap(assuming a lot of them actually do) and are willing to destroy their societies in the name of it. But they do(at least some of them), and they are.

We need rope. Lots of rope.


Anonymous said...

One way to attempt to reach that 80% CO2 reduction goal is to kill 100% of the liberals. And that especially includes the EnviroNazis. Leaves more for the rest of us who will appreciate it more. And with all the dead people's property left behind, there'll be less need to manufacure anything, resulting in even more CO2 reduction.

As far as I can see, it's a win-win.

B Woodman

Anonymous said...

I said this back in December:

Burn it all

There is no doubt that the world is going to pump up and burn every drop of oil. Even if the west switches to alternatives the second and third world will still have to burn the oil. And that's not taking into account the other products like plastics that we get from oil - even if all our energy was derived from alternatives, we'd still use up the oil.

So if we're going to burn it all anyway, there are only three questions.

1. How much will we pollute the earth before we run out of oil
2. Who is going to have the economic strength to take advantage of a non-oil world
3. Who is going to have the industrial and technological capability to switch to a non-oil economy

How much will we pollute the earth before we run out of oil

Due to cleaner, more efficient technology the west pollutes less per drop of oil than the second and third world. Our auto's and plants are cleaner than those found is less modernized nations.

Imagine if we stopped all oil usage today, the third world would still burn up every drop of oil. Except they would burn all that oil using smoky, nasty polluting technology.

From the environmental perspective it would be better if the west burns that oil - it would produce less total pollution.

Who is going to have the economic strength to take advantage of a non-oil world

At the rate China, India, Indonesia and other second world countries are mushrooming economically, the west is in real danger of being overtaken economically. These countries economies are even more oil dependent than the west. It would be in the west's best interest to use up all the oil as fast as possible before we become the second world countries.

Who is going to have the industrial and technological capability to switch to a non-oil economy

Currently only the west has the industrial and technological capability to switch to a non-oil economy. But, as time passes, the second world will be more capable of making the switch, and do it easier and cheaper than us. Therefore, again, the faster we burn up the oil the better positioned we will be when it runs out.

Ancillary bonus to running out of oil

Once we pump out the last drop of oil that will finally take some of the more troublesome countries of the world out of play. Such countries who make fortunes from their oil production, all the while hating the west with every breath. The faster those countries run out of unlimited income, the less likely we will have hostile, nuclear armed countries sprouting up everywhere.

So I say burn it all, burn it fast, don't look back.

Anonymous said...

I'll take 'Obama Is' for $1,000, Alex.

Paul, Dammit! said...

I used to laugh at commentators who talked about subtle racism among liberals who attempt to choke off development among developing countries citing aesthetic concerns. I have come to the conclusion that there can be no other excuse.