Tuesday, November 25, 2014

If this shit doesn't count as 'with malice', what does?

“The Times “had no qualms whatsoever about publishing almost all the information needed for Officer Darren Wilson’s enemies to track him and his wife down at home,” John Nolte writes at Big Journalism, noting that “This malicious move by the New York Times has not gone unnoticed by Ferguson’s protesters,” as the International Business Times reports:
But printing his street name in the nation’s most influential newspaper on the day the grand jury is expected to hand up a decision on the indictment could reignite interest in — and awareness of — the location, and some critics worry that it could result in protesters descending on his home. Slate even went a step further than the Times, publishing an article featuring a photo of the modest, red-brick house on Monday.
Yes, the bastards are evil.  They damn well knew what this would lead to, which means they WANT it to happen.

'Journalists'.  Fucking dirtbags.


AM said...

Next time some liberal asks me "why do you think you would need a machine gun?" I'll respond.

"To save my life after the angry mob descends on my house after the address is published, with photos, in the New York Times."

Anonymous said...

Not reporters - they are fourth estate fifth columnists for the glorious peoples revolution.