it didn't happen.
They have been arguing, for example, over diverging interpretations of events such as World War II — which EU enthusiasts risibly call the ‘European Civil War’.
Farcically, it’s been decided to omit any exhibit on which agreement cannot be reached.
And because of their differing views about World War II, the museum will begin with an EU ‘year zero’ of 1946.
1 comment:
How can they agree on anything AFTER 1946 either? As I recall there was a little disagreement among the various European nations about how the nanny state was to be imposed, and how much central control was appropriate at that time to impose on the people. It was called the "Cold War".
Maybe they should do like my High School German class, and omit everything after 1914 -- sorry, 1948-- we never mentioned Bismarck.
And my German teacher was Polish!
(Such intentional omissions resulted in a High School history teacher saying that "Sieg heil" meant, "die for", instead of "Victory, hail".
Idiots.
Of course, whom gods destroy they first make mad.
Post a Comment