Saturday, May 03, 2014

Bob Beckel is a vile little hack,

isn't he?
“Let me finish!” Beckel said, pounding his fists on the table. “Let me finish by saying with what I think Hillary Clinton says — we know Islamic radicals killed these people, what difference does it make anymore?”

“Because they covered it up, Bob,” Bolling shot back.

“So what?!” Beckel screamed. “Every administration covers things up.”
If this were a President with a 'R' showing his party, Beckel would be screaming for his head for lying and the cover-up, and all the other crap the media would have dug up and publicized by now; but THIS is a DEMOCRAT President, so that's different.

Beckel also said “who cares” when asked if the Obama administration should be able to cover up Benghazi details just because it makes the president look bad. He also claimed that Americans are not still interested in finding out what happened in Benghazi.

You miserable fat bastard many millions have been TRYING to find out from day one, and assholes like you helped obstruct that, and now you claim NOBODY WANTS TO KNOW?

Proper description of Bob Beckel would require lots of invective and pictures of diseased anal sphincters.


Dan said...

Beckel is a lot of things....but
"little" is NOT one of them. The man could probably inhale a double cheeseburger in the blink of an eye. What he IS would be a "negative" role model....a glaring example of EVERYTHING a young man should aspire to NOT be.

Keith said...

There are several places in the Koran where the mohammed's control freakery and paranoia get the better of him, and he says that on the day of judgement, the right hand will testify against the left and the left hand will testify against the right.

There was an FBI law enforcement bulletin, July 2012, dedicated to psychopathy

Page 28, there's a piece about psychopaths and their peculiar use of language, and their total unconcern about being caught lying.

Sweet, a psychopath who lived 1300 years ago, describing how one branch of a psychopathic organization is publishing the key to understand another psychopathic branch of the same institution - and its reaction to the activities of the original psychopath's followers.

That same institution also funds some of the researchers who wrote the piece.