Wednesday, May 16, 2012

I fear the answer is 'Yes.'

And it's going to get worse. And those responsible will claim they had nothing to do with it.
"About 20 of us stayed to give statements and make sure everyone was accounted for. The police wouldn't listen to us, they wouldn't take our names or statements. They told us to leave. It was completely infuriating."

The police chief seemed determined to head off any suggestion that this was a racially motivated attack by saying that crime is colorblind. Other officials elsewhere have said similar things.
What the authorities and the media seem determined to suppress is that the hoodlum elements in many ghettos launch coordinated attacks on whites in public places. If there is anything worse than a one-sided race war, it is a two-sided race war, especially when one of the races outnumbers the other several times over.

It may be understandable that some people want to head off such a catastrophe, either by not reporting the attacks in this race war, or not identifying the race of those attacking, or by insisting that the attacks were not racially motivated — even when the attackers themselves voice anti-white invective as they laugh at their bleeding victims.

Trying to keep the lid on is understandable. But a lot of pressure can build up under that lid. If and when that pressure leads to an explosion of white backlash, things could be a lot worse than if the truth had come out earlier, and steps taken by both black and white leaders to deal with the hoodlums and with those who inflame the hoodlums.


James Nelson said...

Theoretically, a PPS-43C with the 35 round magazines is a pistol. Allegedly it would fall under most states concealed carry laws and could be transported loaded on the body or in the vehicle. Supposedly large numbers of high velocity 7.62 projectiles can serve as mob direction changers.

Anonymous said...

Do the cops have any idea who's going to be in No Man's Land if such a race war starts?