enforcing child-porn laws? No terrorists to catch? All their actual jobs done?
Second, why the hell did this require putting on the ninja suits and breaking down doors?
Third, this paragraph:
Investigators could have taken an extra step before going inside the house and used a laptop or other device outside the home to see whether there was an unsecured signal. That alone wouldn't have exonerated the homeowner, but it would have raised the possibility that someone else was responsible for the downloads.
Ah, but that would have required further actual, what's the word... investigating, and that's not as much fun as putting on your ICE jacket( and what the FUCK was ICE doing in this?) and kicking in doors, now is it?
Last, it says he got an 'apology' for the door being smashed in and his being thrown down the stairs; did they(we, actually) pay for the damages?
No comments:
Post a Comment