Friday, April 02, 2010

Rep. Phil Hare(Socialist Democrat Oathbreaker-IL)

'doesn't care about the Constitution'. And also doesn't know that the words he's using to justify his acts aren't FROM the Constitution.

Miserable little oathbreaking politician.


Windy Wilson said...

I heard an excellent argument on the radio this morning; If the Constitution is a "living, breathing document", and amendments can come Supreme Court Justices without the effort and expense of a Constitutional Amendment, then no arguments about what the language of the Constitution means are necessary or possible.

People who argue this have clearly never had to go to court to enforce a contract and face some yahoo lawyer in a fancy suit explain how salable does not mean capable of being offered for sale, or how supervise does not mean oversee, or that even though both parties had lawyers to review every syllable, THEY were taken advantage of by the other side who had some esoteric secret knowledge and enforcing the plain words of the contract is unfair and a miscarriage of justice.

Firehand said...

Always wanted to hear a judge tell such a lawyer "So you're admitting you're incompetent? Were unable to understand what was written on the paper before you? Then your client needs a new lawyer."