First, isn't it either law or regulation that, when asked for it, they're required to show their ID? Do these two just not want to admit their names, or trying to hide them for some other reason?
Second, on the USSS,
On July 13, law enforcement personnel abandoned the rooftop of American Glass Research Building 6—the roof from which Thomas Crooks attempted to assassinate the former president—because of hot weather.
...
• The Secret Service’s Office of Protective Operations-Manpower told agents in charge of security for the Butler rally not to request additional security resources because they would be denied. ...
Oh, there's a lot more.
And now, on the 'investigation'*
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., ranking member of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations told The Federalist in an interview Sunday evening that he is particularly frustrated by the Secret Service’s and FBI’s failure to grant the committee overseeing these agencies access to key sources.
“FBI Deputy Director [Paul] Abbate said they’ve done over 1,000 interviews. We’ve done 12,” Johnson said. “The Secret Service hasn’t let us to talk to them. The FBI hasn’t given us one 302 [interview report]. When we get documents, they’re often the day before, and heavily redacted.”
I think I said before, a lot of people need to be fired. And the list is getting longer.
*Isn't 'investigation' a funny word for "Hide everything we can from the Committee"?
2 comments:
I doubt there's an actual law requiring badgemonkeys to provide a complete identity to their prospective victims. There may be a policy but at best it's really just a recommendation as there is absolutely zero consequences for their failure to follow it.
If they were constrained By the law, they wouldn't be doing what they are doing.
Post a Comment