Sharyl Atkinson has kept a running Benghazi timeline that is quite thorough and admirable. I recommend her timeline as a reliable reference. (Atkinson has character and grit. She has the courage to take on powerful crooks. Between you and me, Jim, you’d do well to follow her example.)
However, Zerohedge’s September 3 timeline directly addresses the obstruction of justice. Here are some critical dates, courtesy Zerohedge. PRN means Platte River Networks, the outfit who Hillary hired to handle her rogue server system. The Apple MacBook mentioned in the timeline contained backup copies of Hillary’s emails.
And some people at Platte River belong in jail, too:
“On March 25, 2015, the Undisclosed
PRN Staff Member had a ‘conference call with President Clinton’s staff.’
Apparently, in the days following that call, the Undisclosed PRN Staff
Member had an ‘oh shit moment’ when he realized he had forgotten to wipe
the PRN server clean as he had been instructed to do back in December
by Cheryl Mills.
Therefore, sometime within the 6 days
after a call with ‘President Clinton’s Staff,’ that PRN server was wiped
clean using BleachBit despite the subpoena from the House Select
Committee on Benghazi received weeks earlier on March 4, 2016.”
Can you say 'Really Bad Idea'?
SaldaƱa’s opposition to the agreement is rooted in disciplinary procedures outlined in Article 28 of the contract, which is set to go before council for approval next week. Under those rules, department officials and arbitrators hearing a case of officer misconduct won’t always get to consider an officer’s full disciplinary history when deciding what punishment to give. As it currently stands, if Chief William McManus wants to discipline an officer, he can’t cite as justification any drug- or alcohol-related violations more than 10 years old; infractions involving “intentional violence” only follow a cop for five years; any other disciplinary action only shows up for two years. If an officer is suspended for three days or less, the department, per the contract, automatically lowers the suspension to a “written reprimand” after a couple of years. Local activists calling for police reform say the policy amounts to government-sanctioned falsification of records.
And in Washington, the AG wants to ban 'assault weapons'. His source for what a good idea this is?
Ferguson’s office contends the move will save lives and cited a recent poll presented by Washington Ceasefire and Ceasefire Oregon that “showed that 65 percent of adults in the two states — including a great many gun owners — favor an assault weapons ban and want lawmakers to act.”
The survey mentioned was announced in July by the groups in a joint effort to erect a “West Coast Wall” by joining with California to establish a ban on what they term “assault weapons” and ultimately magazines capable of holding more than five rounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment