because being able to humiliate and assault people isn't enough authority.
I wonder if the guards' union at Auschwitz campaigned for safety handrails on the guard towers so they wouldn't topple out when drunk?
Few years back I'd have thought that was over the top; after a few years of toys confiscated, lying, people molested, people with medical problems humiliated and endangered, theft and general assholery, I don't.
Mr. Elk, we're AMERICANS, we're not supposed to have 'unquestioning compliance' with clowns who want to treat us like crap and violate our rights. Screw you.
3 comments:
Ausweis, Bitte?
I'm sorry, Godwin's is the only law I think is appropriate to cite in this case.
You know, as I have said before, I have cousins and uncles who wore uniforms on both sides of that late European unpleasantness, including one card carrying Nazi. I can't be the only one with that family history. You'd think that others would be, like me, more attentive to the risks and the signs of going down that road in America.
If I remember right, Godwin just said the longer the argument, the greater the probability of Hitler/nazi being brought up; he didn't say it would necessarily be incorrect...
I think the implicit understanding is, that once Godwin's is invoked, the debating is over...
Post a Comment