Thursday, February 22, 2018

If you want to know just what kind of people we're facing,

this should cover it

"Who cares about that 4th Amendment shit, and the 2nd doesn't count at all!  I want searches and seizures surveillance and executions to properly enforce legislation I want!"
With zero understanding of what'll happen to her and her friends when the precedent is used against them.

For that matter, I wonder if she has any historical understanding of what socialist utopias used this kind of thing to control people?  Nice company she wants to keep.


Phelps said...

Who is going to run the checkpoints when every tenth one gets attacked by a sniper?

Who is going to conduct those town square executions when every executioner gets shot in the head before he can pull the trigger?

Who is going to support them when doing a news report in support of it gets your home invaded and your family killed?

Anonymous said...

Usually the first people Socialist Utopia's round up are the "true" believers as no one trusts a fanatic.

Tim said...

Shame the girls mother didn't opt for an abortion.

sage419 said...

Can we assume that she has the same ideas regarding illegal immigrants? Illegal marijuana users? Etc., etc...

Left Coast Conservative said...

Please post a link. This is so over the top that people might doubt it is real.

Jack Burton said...

I completely agree with the poster.

Guns owners are disrespectful of authority. A failure to rely on authorities is an invariable sign of improper and overly independent attitudes. The mere fact that they gather together to talk about guns at gun shops, gun shows, shooting ranges, and on the internet means that they have some plot going against us normal people. A gun owner has no right to associate with another gun owner.

Therefore, to help ensure our right to happiness and safety we must ban and seize all guns from private hands, and forbid NRA-based criticism towards people who are only trying to help. Searching the homes of all NRA members for any guns and pro-gun literature will go a long way towards reducing crime.

Common sense requires only uniformed soldiers, police, and other agents of the state have access to firearms, and think of all the money we can save by just taking away the guns from private owners and giving them to the military and police. No person should be able to challenge this by writing to Congress or the President. If they do they should be forced in court to admit to it and then fined a hundred million dollars for each time. Subjecting them to torture will probably change their minds.

Making it mandatory that church ministers preach against guns or else they can't get licensed will certainly encourage the church folk to have the correct belief about guns.

We should hold a nation-wide vote against guns but gun-owners cannot be allowed to participate. They are too biased.

People who don't like all this prove they are on the side of the killers with the guns and should be put in jail along side all the gangbangers and other gun nuts. Letting them sit in jail for a few years before they are charged will give the government plenty of time to find something wrong in their lives. Anything they say, write, or express should be held against them to prove their guilt.

We should bring all of them here to Chicago to be tried by Mayor Rahmfather as judge, and we should allow only mothers who have lost children to gunfire to be on the juries. Any attorney who tries to defend them should be arrested also. If we don't get the right verdict the first time we can just keep trying them until we do.

No woman needs to protect herself from rape, assault or murder and should just leave crime prevention to the Police who are properly equipped to investigate following the crime's completion. Women using a gun in self-defense interferes with and makes the attempted crime a "non-event," which unnecessarily complicates the Police investigation. Any woman who does this should be put in jail for interfering with an investigation.

If someone still really, really thinks they have a need for a gun in their home for protection then the Army should just force them to host and feed some armed soldiers.

Those who claim that the 2nd amendment was given to us because we might someday need guns to use against an oppressive government forget that our Constitution has strong internal safeguards to protect our freedoms. So there!

Long live our Constitution!

Jack Burton said...

"This is so over the top that people might doubt it is real."

Poe's Law in action

Dan said...

While it's tempting to think this is satire or fiction the sad reality is that there is no shortage of leftists who actually think this way. Obama mentor Bill Ayers while plotting revolution as part of the Weather Underground stated that about 10% of Americans were "uneducable" and would have to be eliminated. a communist killing millions isn't a problem if it serves the agenda. So to this communist killing gun owners is perfectly acceptable. In reality Civil War II is well under way. We'd best get to fighting it before the left gains too big an advantage. They already own the media, the education system and most of the government bureaucracy.

Anonymous said...

People like this will be the first to cower and run away once the bullets start flying their way. Keep pushing leftists but remember, we didn't spend the last 8 years getting ready for nothing. Some of us are fresh out of the sandbox and just waiting for a person to start doing the things proposed in this post. We dare you

Firehand said...

Unfortunately, no link; guy pointed this out on Bookface. And it wouldn't surprise me if, per usual, the twit deleted it when found out was taking heat for pushing for extrajudicial murders(among other things).

Anonymous said...

Once again, violence proposed by a person whose nose has never been flattened, let alone having looked into the eyes of somebody intent upon killing her. Tis to laugh.