Ran across this a couple of days ago; long piece on the attacks, the investigation and the conclusions. And the ending sucks. "We think this guy did it, but we have no actual evidence that he did." And since they already had to pay millions to a guy they falsely accused of doing it...
Maybe Ivins did do it; but not only can't they prove it, they don't know it. Not good.
It’s an unnerving scenario. But there’s something much scarier to contemplate. There’s still the possibility that the government was as wrong about Ivins as it was about Hatfill. If that’s the case, the anthrax mailer is still at large. And that means someone launched the deadliest biological attack in the history of the United States—and got away with it.
2 comments:
I think that the only thing he was guilty of was being weird. All through history, that has been a capital offense in police states. It seems to be so now in America. Draw your own conclusions.
They couldn't convict him, so they murdered him instead.
And that means someone launched the deadliest biological attack in the history of the United States
Well, yeah, true.
But at the same time, that attack only killed five people, which in the history of biological warfare makes it total piker work.
Post a Comment