Hell no.
There are two main causes of concern for Emerald. Firstly, the work
could be seen to incite racial hatred and stir up religious hatred under
United Kingdom law. Clearly you have no intention of promoting racism
but intent can be irrelevant. For example, one test is merely whether it
is “likely” that racial hatred could be stirred up as a result of the
work. This is a particular difficulty given modern means of digital
media expression. The potential for circulation of the more
controversial passages of the manuscript online, without the wider
intellectual context of the work as a whole and to a very broad
audience—in a manner beyond our control—represents a material legal risk
for Emerald.
Secondly, there are many instances in the manuscript where the
actions, conversations and behavior of identifiable individuals at
specific named colleges are discussed in detail and at length in
relation to controversial events. Given the sensitivity of the issues
involved, there is both the potential for serious harm to Emerald’s
reputation and the significant possibility of legal action. Substantial
changes to the content and nature of the manuscript would need to be
made, or Emerald would need to accept a high level of risk both
reputational and legal. The practical costs and difficulty of managing
any reputational or legal problems that did arise are of further concern
to Emerald.
Short version: "The law can see anything as hate speech if someone complains. And even if your information is perfectly correct and documented, it could cause problems. So we won't publish your book."
No comments:
Post a Comment