"However much it takes, comrade!"

That’s why it’s fair to ask Rep. Bloodlust how much blood he’s prepared to shed to achieve his goal of disarming Normal Americans.

Rep. Swalwell, some people are going to fight rather than cave in, so what’s the number of bodies you would be willing to pile up to win? Let’s put aside the right or wrong of resistance; it’ll be a thing. It’ll happen. 
...
Now, Congressman Strangelove properly took a lot of grief for suggesting nuking fellow Americans, but even if you accept his backtracking about how this was a joke – nothing’s funnier than suggesting the mass murder of fellow Americans! – he only put nukes off limits. What killing systems are still on the table? Infantry? Artillery? Bombers? Because his answer assumed that he would support prosecuting a war against those who failed to obey and submit to arrest.
Guarantee that if someone was able to ask him this, he'd try to blow it off and ask why they're being so dramatic.  Because he either hasn't thought through this, or he doesn't have the balls to admit it outright: every time you pass a law, you're saying you're willing to put people in prison, and kill them if they resist the arrest, to enforce that law.  As the gentleman put it, "It all ends in puppy-killing SWAT teams".