even with incomplete and/or inaccurate records- was just fine, but to dare put up the addresses of the journalists behind it? Oh, that's disgusting!
doesn't move the issue of gun control to the level of intelligent
public discussion," he said.
"Instead, it transforms what should be a
rational public debate on a contentious issue into ugly gutter
For the moment, let's ignore that the purpose of the newpaper wasn't 'moving the issue to intelligent discussion', but trying to shame people who own guns. And made them targets for burglary.
I put up a post about it, and just got this from a ever-popular Anonymous:
Professor Good is now the target of multiple death threats. Your posting
a photo of his HOUSE is now linked to this crime and you are now a
suspect. Nice going.
I thought I'd elaborate on my response:
You see a photo in that post? No? How about in the linked post at OGAM? No again? Oh, but OGAM had a link?
I don't see you displaying any outrage over these squirrels screwing with peoples' lives simply because they may own a gun; or over Good thinking that's just fine.
So piss off.